Dose-escalation of Rectal Indomethacin for Preventing PEP
1 other identifier
interventional
1,036
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Our aim is to compare the efficacy of 100 mg versus 200 mg rectal indometacin in preventing post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) among high-risk patients without no pancreatic stenting. The 100 mg versus 200 mg indometacin trial is a multicentre, single-blind, randomized controlled study. High-risk patients for PEP without pancreatic stent insertion will be informed about the opportunity to participate. A total of 1,036 eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: (1) administration of 100 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (standard-dose group), or (2) administration of 200 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (high-dose group). The primary outcome is the incidence and severity of PEP. Secondary outcomes include hyperamylasemia and other ERCP-related adverse events (AEs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Dec 2025
Typical duration for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2028
November 25, 2025
September 1, 2025
3 years
November 18, 2025
November 18, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
the incidence and severity of PEP
Patients were identified as post-ERCPpancreatitis if meeting two out of three criteria: pain consistent with acute pancreatitis; amylase or lipase\>3 times normal limit; characteristic findings on imaging, in according to the Revised Atlanta International consensus.
up to 1 months
Study Arms (2)
standard-dose group
ACTIVE COMPARATORadministration of 100 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP
high-dose group
EXPERIMENTALadministration of 200 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP
Interventions
A total of 1,036 eligible patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two groups: (1) administration of 100 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (standard-dose group), or (2) administration of 200 mg rectal indometacin immediately after ERCP (high-dose group)
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Hefei, Anhui, 230022, China
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shaofei Wang
Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- For enhanced objectivity in data analysis, the project statisticians will be blinded to the arm allocation.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2025
First Posted
November 25, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 30, 2028
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
We are committed to promoting transparency and open science. Upon reasonable request and under certain conditions, individual participant data (IPD) from our study may be shared for further research. Access to the IPD will be considered on a case-by-case basis, following review and approval of a formal proposal by Qiao Mei. To inquire about accessing the IPD, interested parties may contact Qiao Mei at meiqiaomq@aliyun.com. Please note that data sharing is contingent upon meeting the criteria for ethical use, privacy, and confidentiality as outlined in our data sharing policy. Additionally, appropriate data transfer agreements may need to be established prior to sharing.