Comparative Study Between Conventional Radiofrequency Ablation vs Chemical Neurolysis of Ganglion Impar for Treatment of Chronic Non Cancer Related Coccydynia
1 other identifier
interventional
74
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Aim: compare effectiveness (satisfaction) and duration of pain relief between patients who perform the conventional thermal radiofrequency on the ganglion impar vs patients who perform the chemical neurolysis with alcohol in patients with non cancer coccydynia patients with non cancer coccydynia not responding to medical treatment will be divided into 2 groups before intervention , control group will receive conventional radiofrequency ablation of ganglion impar , while the study group will receive alcohol neurolysis
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 25, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedNovember 25, 2025
November 1, 2025
8 months
November 17, 2025
November 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
pain relief using Numeric Pain score scale
patients will be asked to describe their pain on Numeric pain scale ( an 11 numbers scale where 0 describes no pain and 10 describes the worst pain ) and compare it to before the procedure
1 month
pain relief of chronic non cancer coccydynia
patients will be asked to describe their pain on Numeric pain scale and compare it to before the procedure
6 months after the procedure
patient global impression of change (PGIC)
one-item questionnaire that asks patients to rate their overall improvement after a treatment.he scale typically includes ratings such as "very much improved," "much improved," "minimally improved," "unchanged," or "worse".
6 months
Study Arms (2)
radiofrequency group
ACTIVE COMPARATORpatients with non cancer coccydynia in this group will receive conventional radiofrequency on ganglion impar
alcohol neurolysis group
EXPERIMENTALpatients in this group will receive alcohol neurolysis on ganglion impar
Interventions
The entry site was detected under fluoroscopy then local anesthesia was given using lidocaine 2% followed by the insertion of a radiofrequency cannulas (STRYKER 20 G, 9 cm with 1 cm active tip) targeting the junction between the coccygeal bones and pass through it anteriorly in the lateral view. Finally confirming the proper site with a contrast dye in lateral and A-P views. 10 ml of lidocaine 1 % was injected to tolerate the ablation then in the 1st group placing of the radiofrequency cable followed by ablation will be done at 80 degrees for 90 seconds.
The entry site was detected under fluoroscopy then local anesthesia was given using lidocaine 2% followed by the insertion 22 G spinal needle targeting the junction between the coccygeal bones and pass through it anteriorly in the lateral view. Finally confirming the proper site with a contrast dye in lateral and A-P views. 10 ml of lidocaine 1 % was injected to tolerate the ablation then injection of 5 ml 70% alcohol will be performed
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- non cancer coccydynia
- Both genders
- Age between 20-70 years.
- ASA 1,2 \& 3 physical status
- xray coccyx lateral position showing normal joints and bones with no fractures
You may not qualify if:
- Neurological disorders. (previous central and peripheral CNS affection).
- coagulopathy INR \> 1.8 or platelets \< 50,000.
- Infection at or near the injection site.
- Presence of pacemaker or defibrillator.
- known allergy to used medications.
- patients with previous history of Radiotherapy, chemotherapy or metastasis
- pregnant patients.
- patients with rheumatological disorders (rheumatoid arthritis, diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyerostosis, psoriatic arthritis)
- age \<20 or \>70
- Xray coccyx showing fractures or abnormalities
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt
Related Publications (1)
Fogel GR, Cunningham PY 3rd, Esses SI. Coccygodynia: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2004 Jan-Feb;12(1):49-54. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200401000-00007.
PMID: 14753797BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- lecturer of anesthesia , intensive care and pain management
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2025
First Posted
November 25, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2025
Primary Completion
November 1, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11