The PEDAL Intervention - Reducing Affective Lability in Bipolar Disorder
PEDAL
2 other identifiers
interventional
120
1 country
4
Brief Summary
PEDAL is a group-based intervention for patients with bipolar disorder that builds on the traditional group psychoeducational program (GPP) by adding digital tools and specific strategies to help manage rapid fluctuations between affective states, known as affective lability. The program's goal is to help patients learn and develop new ways to better manage their condition, with particular attention to affective lability and other difficulties with affect regulation- challenges which are not typically addressed in current treatments. The PEDAL trial will run at five clinical sites around Oslo and Vestre Viken, aiming to recruit 120 participants with bipolar disorder. The program combines existing group sessions from GPP with new components: additional group sessions focusing on strategies for improving affect regulation such as mindfulness and distress tolerance, an online platform with all course materials including instructional videos and other resources, and an app-based mood diary. This framework maintains the benefits of regular group meetings while adding digital support tools to make the intervention more personalized and accessible. The main aim of PEDAL is to see if the new program reduces affective lability more effectively than GPP (treatment-as-usual; TAU), and both intervention groups will be compared on the level of affective lability before and after the intervention. Several secondary outcomes like mood symptoms, suicidal thoughts, perceived stress, and quality of life will also be assessed. In terms of study design, all study sites will run the PEDAL and TAU groups in parallel, and participants will be randomly assigned to either PEDAL or TAU. To qualify for the study, participants must be aged 18-65, diagnosed with bipolar disorder, able to participate in a group intervention, capable of providing informed consent, and have a smartphone or computer. People who have previously completed group psychoeducation, who are unable to complete the study period due to pregnancy or other factors, or those who cannot use the required technology are excluded. In summary, PEDAL is a novel study that modernizes the existing group psychoeducational program for bipolar disorder by targeting affective lability through skills training and digital tools, while also evaluating its reception and effects in a controlled clinical trial.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Nov 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 16, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 20, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 25, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
November 25, 2025
November 1, 2025
7 months
November 16, 2025
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline to follow-up 1 (week 13 in TAU and week 15 in PEDAL) on the 18 item Affective Lability Scale - short form (ALS-SF)
The Affective Lability Scale is a validated self-report instrument assessing the typical pattern and level of affective lability, from 0 (not very descriptive of me) to 3 (very descriptive of me). Change = Follow-up 1 total score minus baseline total score.
Baseline, week 13/15 (follow-up 1) and week 37/39 (follow-up 2)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10)
Baseline, week 13/15 (follow-up 1) and week 37/39 (follow-up 2)
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms - self-report version (QIDS-SR)
Baseline, week 13/15 (follow-up 1) and week 37/39 (follow-up 2)
The Bech-Rafelsen Mania Scale (BRMS)
Baseline, week 13/15 (follow-up 1) and week 37/39 (follow-up 2)
Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale - Short Form (DERS-SF)
Baseline, week 13/15 (follow-up 1) and week 37/39 (follow-up 2)
WHO-5 Well-Being Index
Baseline, week 13/15 (follow-up 1) and week 37/39 (follow-up 2)
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
electronic Case Report Form (eCRF)
Baseline.
Study Arms (2)
TAU: Traditional group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder
ACTIVE COMPARATORTraditional GPP for bipolar disorder consists of 11 group sessions led by one or two trained therapists. The sessions comprise predefined topics such as the characteristics of BD, theories about etiology, managing depression and mania, psychopharmacological treatment, and lifestyle advice to enhance illness stabilization. Each session has an introductory lecture on the topic held by the therapist, small-group discussions based on the participants' experiences in this area, and plenary discussions led by the therapist. The program also provides written material for the participants to read and prepare for the relevant session, provided in a booklet. It contains the educational parts, a toolkit with a mood diary, an overview of potential "warning signs" for relapse, and an emergency plan. The toolkit is used to engage the participants in self-management of the disorder.
PEDAL: Group psychoeducation with digital elements and focus on affective lability
EXPERIMENTALThe PEDAL arm provides the 11 group sessions as described for the comparator arm, and two additional sessions that have been developed for the trial to cover topics related to affective lability and emotion regulation. Thus, in this arm there will be 13 group sessions. The format of the sessions is the same as for the TAU arm. In addition, participants in this arm will have access to an online platform with the following content: All written course material, three video tutorials for emotion regulation skills training, and an app-based mood diary that provides a dashboard where participants can monitor their mood and sleep patterns.
Interventions
Psychosocial intervention
Psychosocial intervention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bipolar I, II or not otherwise specified disorder
- Understands Scandinavian language
- Owns and will use smartphone as part of the intervention
- Is considered eligible for group participation by treating clinician
You may not qualify if:
- Previous participation in group psychoeducation for bipolar disorder
- Will move, is late in pregnancy or other situation that prevents competion of trial
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Oslo University Hospitallead
- Vestre Viken Hospital Trustcollaborator
- Diakonhjemmet Hospitalcollaborator
- Lovisenberg Diakonale Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Vestre Viken Hospital Trust (Drammen DPS)
Drammen, 3018, Norway
Oslo University Hospital (Nydalen DPS and Søndre Oslo DPS)
Oslo, 0351, Norway
Diakonhjemmet Hospital (Allmennpsykiatrisk poliklinikk)
Oslo, 0373, Norway
Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital (Section for Group Treatment)
Oslo, 0440, Norway
Related Publications (25)
Rozental A, Kottorp A, Boettcher J, Andersson G, Carlbring P. Negative Effects of Psychological Treatments: An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Negative Effects Questionnaire for Monitoring and Reporting Adverse and Unwanted Events. PLoS One. 2016 Jun 22;11(6):e0157503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157503. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27331907BACKGROUNDFaurholt-Jepsen M, Frokjaer VG, Nasser A, Jorgensen NR, Kessing LV, Vinberg M. Associations between the cortisol awakening response and patient-evaluated stress and mood instability in patients with bipolar disorder: an exploratory study. Int J Bipolar Disord. 2021 Mar 1;9(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40345-020-00214-0.
PMID: 33644824BACKGROUNDTopp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
PMID: 25831962BACKGROUNDVisted E, Solbakken OA, Maeland S, Fadnes LT, Bjerrum LB, Nordhus IH, Flo-Groeneboom E. Validation of a brief version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS-16) with an older Norwegian population. Eur J Ageing. 2023 Jun 22;20(1):26. doi: 10.1007/s10433-023-00775-w.
PMID: 37347324BACKGROUNDMiola A, Cattarinussi G, Antiga G, Caiolo S, Solmi M, Sambataro F. Difficulties in emotion regulation in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 1;302:352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.102. Epub 2022 Jan 29.
PMID: 35093412BACKGROUNDDork J, Mangan E, Burns L, Dimenstein E. Affective Instability: Impact of Fluctuating Emotions on Regulation and Psychological Well-Being. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Sep 6;14(9):783. doi: 10.3390/bs14090783.
PMID: 39335997BACKGROUNDRush AJ, Trivedi MH, Ibrahim HM, Carmody TJ, Arnow B, Klein DN, Markowitz JC, Ninan PT, Kornstein S, Manber R, Thase ME, Kocsis JH, Keller MB. The 16-Item Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Sep 1;54(5):573-83. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8.
PMID: 12946886BACKGROUNDLagerberg TV, Aminoff SR, Aas M, Bjella T, Henry C, Leboyer M, Pedersen G, Bellivier F, Icick R, Andreassen OA, Etain B, Melle I. Alcohol use disorders are associated with increased affective lability in bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:316-324. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.062. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
PMID: 27810713BACKGROUNDLicht RW, Jensen J. Validation of the Bech-Rafaelsen Mania Scale using latent structure analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997 Nov;96(5):367-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09931.x.
PMID: 9395155BACKGROUNDAas M, Pedersen G, Henry C, Bjella T, Bellivier F, Leboyer M, Kahn JP, Cohen RF, Gard S, Aminoff SR, Lagerberg TV, Andreassen OA, Melle I, Etain B. Psychometric properties of the Affective Lability Scale (54 and 18-item version) in patients with bipolar disorder, first-degree relatives, and healthy controls. J Affect Disord. 2015 Feb 1;172:375-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.028. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
PMID: 25451440BACKGROUNDGrande I, Berk M, Birmaher B, Vieta E. Bipolar disorder. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1561-1572. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00241-X. Epub 2015 Sep 18.
PMID: 26388529BACKGROUNDJoas E, Backman K, Karanti A, Sparding T, Colom F, Palsson E, Landen M. Psychoeducation for bipolar disorder and risk of recurrence and hospitalization - a within-individual analysis using registry data. Psychol Med. 2020 Apr;50(6):1043-1049. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719001053. Epub 2019 May 6.
PMID: 31057138BACKGROUNDHidalgo-Mazzei D, Reinares M, Mateu A, Nikolova VL, Bonnin CDM, Samalin L, Garcia-Estela A, Perez-Sola V, Young AH, Strejilevich S, Vieta E, Colom F. OpenSIMPLe: A real-world implementation feasibility study of a smartphone-based psychoeducation programme for bipolar disorder. J Affect Disord. 2018 Dec 1;241:436-445. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.08.048. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PMID: 30145515BACKGROUNDDepp CA, Ceglowski J, Wang VC, Yaghouti F, Mausbach BT, Thompson WK, Granholm EL. Augmenting psychoeducation with a mobile intervention for bipolar disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Affect Disord. 2015 Mar 15;174:23-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2014.10.053. Epub 2014 Nov 8.
PMID: 25479050BACKGROUNDFaurholt-Jepsen M, Lindbjerg Tonning M, Fros M, Martiny K, Tuxen N, Rosenberg N, Busk J, Winther O, Thaysen-Petersen D, Aamund KA, Tolderlund L, Bardram JE, Kessing LV. Reducing the rate of psychiatric re-admissions in bipolar disorder using smartphones-The RADMIS trial. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021 May;143(5):453-465. doi: 10.1111/acps.13274. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
PMID: 33354769BACKGROUNDFaurholt-Jepsen M, Frost M, Christensen EM, Bardram JE, Vinberg M, Kessing LV. The effect of smartphone-based monitoring on illness activity in bipolar disorder: the MONARCA II randomized controlled single-blinded trial. Psychol Med. 2020 Apr;50(5):838-848. doi: 10.1017/S0033291719000710. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
PMID: 30944054BACKGROUNDTorous J, Bucci S, Bell IH, Kessing LV, Faurholt-Jepsen M, Whelan P, Carvalho AF, Keshavan M, Linardon J, Firth J. The growing field of digital psychiatry: current evidence and the future of apps, social media, chatbots, and virtual reality. World Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;20(3):318-335. doi: 10.1002/wps.20883.
PMID: 34505369BACKGROUNDDucasse D, Jaussent I, Guillaume S, Azorin JM, Bellivier F, Belzeaux R, Bougerol T, Etain B, Gard S, Henry C, Kahn JP, Leboyer M, Loftus J, Passerieux C; FondaMental Advanced Centers of Expertise in Bipolar Disorders (FACE-BD) Collaborators; Olie E, Courtet P. Affect lability predicts occurrence of suicidal ideation in bipolar patients: a two-year prospective study. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2017 May;135(5):460-469. doi: 10.1111/acps.12710. Epub 2017 Mar 5.
PMID: 28260234BACKGROUNDAas M, Henry C, Bellivier F, Lajnef M, Gard S, Kahn JP, Lagerberg TV, Aminoff SR, Bjella T, Leboyer M, Andreassen OA, Melle I, Etain B. Affective lability mediates the association between childhood trauma and suicide attempts, mixed episodes and co-morbid anxiety disorders in bipolar disorders. Psychol Med. 2017 Apr;47(5):902-912. doi: 10.1017/S0033291716003081. Epub 2016 Nov 29.
PMID: 27894372BACKGROUNDHoegh MC, Melle I, Aminoff SR, Laskemoen JF, Buchmann CB, Ueland T, Lagerberg TV. Affective lability across psychosis spectrum disorders. Eur Psychiatry. 2020 May 6;63(1):e53. doi: 10.1192/j.eurpsy.2020.44.
PMID: 32372737BACKGROUNDGershon A, Eidelman P. Inter-episode affective intensity and instability: predictors of depression and functional impairment in bipolar disorder. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2015 Mar;46:14-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2014.07.005. Epub 2014 Aug 7.
PMID: 25164093BACKGROUNDHenry C, Van den Bulke D, Bellivier F, Roy I, Swendsen J, M'Bailara K, Siever LJ, Leboyer M. Affective lability and affect intensity as core dimensions of bipolar disorders during euthymic period. Psychiatry Res. 2008 May 30;159(1-2):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.11.016. Epub 2008 Mar 4.
PMID: 18295902BACKGROUNDKallestad H, Wullum E, Scott J, Stiles TC, Morken G. The long-term outcomes of an effectiveness trial of group versus individual psychoeducation for bipolar disorders. J Affect Disord. 2016 Sep 15;202:32-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.043. Epub 2016 May 24.
PMID: 27253214BACKGROUNDMichalak EE, Yatham LN, Wan DD, Lam RW. Perceived quality of life in patients with bipolar disorder. Does group psychoeducation have an impact? Can J Psychiatry. 2005 Feb;50(2):95-100. doi: 10.1177/070674370505000204.
PMID: 15807225BACKGROUNDColom F, Vieta E, Sanchez-Moreno J, Palomino-Otiniano R, Reinares M, Goikolea JM, Benabarre A, Martinez-Aran A. Group psychoeducation for stabilised bipolar disorders: 5-year outcome of a randomised clinical trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Mar;194(3):260-5. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.107.040485.
PMID: 19252157BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- Statistical analysts
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 16, 2025
First Posted
November 20, 2025
Study Start
November 25, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data is considered too difficult to anonymise.