NCT07239141

Brief Summary

This study will test two video laryngoscopes that help doctors place a breathing tube during surgery. A breathing tube is needed for people who receive general anesthesia so they can breathe safely. Video laryngoscopes use a small camera to give a better view of the throat and vocal cords, which may help the tube go in on the first try. The purpose of this research is to find out if a Colombian device called Laringocel® works as well as the widely used international device C-MAC D-Blade® (Karl Storz). If Laringocel® performs similarly, it could be a more affordable option for hospitals with limited resources. 252 adults (126 in each group) who need elective surgery at Alma Máter Hospital de Antioquia (Medellín, Colombia) will take part. Each participant will be randomly assigned, like flipping a coin, to have their breathing tube placed with either Laringocel® or C-MAC D-Blade®. Only trained anesthesiologists will perform the procedure. The study will look at: Main goal: how often the tube goes in correctly on the first attempt. Other goals: overall success within 3 attempts, how well the airway is seen, how long the intubation takes, how satisfied the doctor is with the device, and possible side effects such as sore throat, dental injury, or oral injury. Participation will not change the usual care people receive during anesthesia. Both devices are already approved for clinical use. Risks are the same as with any standard intubation, and participants will be checked after surgery for any problems. By comparing these two devices, researchers hope to learn if Laringocel® can provide safe and effective intubation at lower cost, improving access to advanced airway tools.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
252

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 15, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 20, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 4, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

December 11, 2025

Status Verified

December 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

November 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

December 9, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Videolaryngoscopy

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • First-attempt orotracheal intubation success

    Proportion of participants with successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt, defined as correct placement of the endotracheal tube confirmed by continuous capnography. A successful attempt is one in which the videolaryngoscope is introduced and removed only once, without requiring a second attempt, device change, or external assistance.

    During the intubation procedure (intraoperative, immediately after induction of anesthesia)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Overall orotracheal intubation success within three attempts

    During the intubation procedure (intraoperative, immediately after induction of anesthesia)

  • Percentage of Glottic Opening (POGO) score

    During the intubation procedure (intraoperative, immediately after induction of anesthesia)

  • Fremantle score

    During the intubation procedure (intraoperative, immediately after induction of anesthesia).

  • Intubation time

    During the intubation procedure (intraoperative, immediately after induction of anesthesia)

  • Operator satisfaction

    Immediately after the intubation procedure (intraoperative period)

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Laringocel

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in this group will undergo orotracheal intubation using the Laringocel videolaryngoscope

Device: Laringocel® videolaryngoscope

C-MAC D-Blade

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in this group will undergo orotracheal intubation using the C-MAC D-Blade video laryngoscope (Karl Storz).

Device: C-MAC® D-Blade videolaryngoscope

Interventions

Orotracheal intubation performed with a hyperangulated C-MAC® D-Blade videolaryngoscope (Karl Storz®) by board-certified anesthesiologists who have completed a validated learning curve (CUSUM). Participants will undergo general anesthesia with adequate neuromuscular relaxation. The type and dose of anesthetic drugs will be determined by the attending anesthesiologist, ensuring at least an effective dose equivalent to ED95. If succinylcholine is used, intubation will be performed 45 seconds after administration; for cisatracurium, after 4 minutes; and for vecuronium or rocuronium, after 2 minutes.

C-MAC D-Blade

Orotracheal intubation performed with a hyperangulated Laringocel® videolaryngoscope by board-certified anesthesiologists who have completed a validated learning curve (CUSUM). Participants will undergo general anesthesia with adequate neuromuscular relaxation. The type and dose of anesthetic drugs will be determined by the attending anesthesiologist, ensuring at least an effective dose equivalent to ED95. If succinylcholine is used, intubation will be performed 45 seconds after administration; for cisatracurium, after 4 minutes; and for vecuronium or rocuronium, after 2 minutes.

Laringocel

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients 18 years of age or older
  • Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia
  • Patients requiring single-lumen orotracheal intubation
  • Patients compliant with the anesthetic indication and standard preoperative fasting requirements

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with an anticipated difficult airway (more than two anatomical risk factors for difficult airway)
  • Patient refusal to participate in the study via informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hospital Alma Máter de Antioquia

Medellín, Antioquia, 050021, Colombia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (9)

  • Sotres-Ramos D, Almendra-Arao F, Anguiano-Mondragon E. A New Method for the Comparison of Powers of Noninferiority Exact Tests for the Difference of Proportions. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2014 Sep;48(5):592-600. doi: 10.1177/2168479014523005.

    PMID: 30231446BACKGROUND
  • Mort TC. Emergency tracheal intubation: complications associated with repeated laryngoscopic attempts. Anesth Analg. 2004 Aug;99(2):607-13, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000122825.04923.15.

    PMID: 15271750BACKGROUND
  • Zhang J, Jiang W, Urdaneta F. Economic analysis of the use of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the surgical setting. J Comp Eff Res. 2021 Jul;10(10):831-844. doi: 10.2217/cer-2021-0068. Epub 2021 Apr 27.

    PMID: 33904779BACKGROUND
  • Heidegger T. Management of the Difficult Airway. N Engl J Med. 2021 May 13;384(19):1836-1847. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1916801. No abstract available.

    PMID: 33979490BACKGROUND
  • Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG; CONSORT Group. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012 Dec 26;308(24):2594-604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802.

    PMID: 23268518BACKGROUND
  • Aziz MF, Abrons RO, Cattano D, Bayman EO, Swanson DE, Hagberg CA, Todd MM, Brambrink AM. First-Attempt Intubation Success of Video Laryngoscopy in Patients with Anticipated Difficult Direct Laryngoscopy: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the C-MAC D-Blade Versus the GlideScope in a Mixed Provider and Diverse Patient Population. Anesth Analg. 2016 Mar;122(3):740-750. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001084.

    PMID: 26579847BACKGROUND
  • Hansel J, Rogers AM, Lewis SR, Cook TM, Smith AF. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD011136. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011136.pub3.

    PMID: 35373840BACKGROUND
  • Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, Abdelmalak BB, Agarkar M, Dutton RP, Fiadjoe JE, Greif R, Klock PA, Mercier D, Myatra SN, O'Sullivan EP, Rosenblatt WH, Sorbello M, Tung A. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022 Jan 1;136(1):31-81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002.

    PMID: 34762729BACKGROUND
  • Cook TM, Woodall N, Frerk C; Fourth National Audit Project. Major complications of airway management in the UK: results of the Fourth National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Part 1: anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 2011 May;106(5):617-31. doi: 10.1093/bja/aer058. Epub 2011 Mar 29.

    PMID: 21447488BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Gabriel R Muñoz Miranda, MD, MSc (candidate)

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
the person who generated the randomization sequence is independent from patient recruitment, intervention, and outcome assessment
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
University professor with a master's degree in clinical epidemiology

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2025

First Posted

November 20, 2025

Study Start

December 4, 2025

Primary Completion

April 1, 2026

Study Completion

April 1, 2026

Last Updated

December 11, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data that underlie the published results will be shared. This will include demographic data, airway characteristics, and outcome variables used in the analyses. A data dictionary will accompany the dataset.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
The de-identified individual participant data and supporting documentation will be available after the study is completed and the main results are published. Data will remain accessible for 5 years. After this period, requests will be evaluated on a case-by-case basis, depending on data storage conditions and the status of ethical approval.
Access Criteria
Access will be granted to qualified researchers with methodologically sound proposals for secondary analyses that align with the study objectives or advance research in airway management. Proposals will be reviewed by the Principal Investigator and the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hospital Alma Máter de Antioquia. Approved applicants must sign a data access agreement outlining confidentiality, data security, and publication terms. Requests should be sent to gabriel.munoz@udea.edu.co.

Locations