The Videolaryngoscopy Versus Direct Laringoscopy for Residents Intubation Study
VILARE-Adult
A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Single-blind Study Comparing Direct Laryngoscopy and Videolaryngoscopy for Orotracheal Intubation Performed by Anesthesia Residents in the Operating Room
1 other identifier
interventional
1,008
1 country
9
Brief Summary
The usual intubation technique in the operating room is based on direct laryngoscopy, using a standard Macintosh laryngoscope. However, this skill is not easy to acquire and requires adecuate training. Videolaryngoscopes are becoming a widely accepted airway management technique. because offer better view of the glottis and are easy to use. In addition, indirect laryngoscopes are useful for tracheal intubation by novice operators because of the feedback that supervisors can offer during intubation. The goal of this clinical trial is to learn which intubation technique performed by residents of anesthesia in the operating room is better. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Which intubation technique is more effective for achieving first-attempt intubation?
- Which intubation technique results in fewer complications? Researchers will compare both intubation techniques performed by anesthesia residents in the operating room in adult anesthesia cases.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
9 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 10, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
February 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 16, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 3, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 24, 2026
CompletedMarch 25, 2026
June 1, 2025
9 months
February 10, 2025
March 24, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference in the first attempt success rate (percentage)
Success on the first attempt is defined as successfully passing the tube through the vocal cords in a single laryngoscopy attempt and inserting the endotracheal tube into the trachea
During intubation
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Comparing the glottic view in the modified Cormack-Lehane scale between the two approaches
During intubation
Difference in percentage of "easy intubation"
During intubation
Duration of laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation
During intubation
Number of attempts to cannulate the trachea with an endotracheal tube
During intubation
Number of attempts to cannulate the trachea with a bougie.
During intubation
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Laryngoscope Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients assigned to the Laryngoscope Group, the operator will use a Macintosh laryngoscope for the first laryngoscopy attempt
Videolaryngoscope Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor patients assigned to the Videolaryngoscope Group, the operator will use a videolaryngoscope with Mac-Style Blade for the first laryngoscopy attempt
Interventions
Anesthesia resident will intubate using a standard laryngoscope.
Anesthesia resident will intubate using a videolaryngoscope (Storz C-MAC, McGrath, Glidescope or other videolaryngoscope)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- ≥18 years old
- Patients who need to be tracheal intubated for a surgical intervention in the surgical area.
- Intubation performed by an anesthesia resident.
You may not qualify if:
- Need for tracheal intubation with a device other than videolaryngoscopy or direct laryngoscopy (fiberoptic bronchoscope, tracheostomy...).
- Context of a Difficult Airway Management.
- Refusal of the patient
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Hospital Universitario Lucus Augustilead
- Hospital Clinico Universitario de Santiagocollaborator
- Complexo Hospitalario de Ourensecollaborator
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedracollaborator
- Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruñacollaborator
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigocollaborator
- Hospital Arquitecto Marcide. Ferrol. A Coruña. (Spain)collaborator
- Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesacollaborator
Study Sites (9)
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de A Coruña
A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
Hospital Universitario de Ferrol
Ferrol, A Coruña, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago
Santiago, A Coruña, Spain
Hospital Universitario Lucus Agusti
Lugo, Lugo, 27003, Spain
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense
Ourense, Ourense, Spain
Complexo Hospitalario de Pontevedra
Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
Complejo Hospitalario Alvaro Cunqueiro Vigo
Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
Hospital POVISA de Vigo
Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
Related Publications (4)
Liu ZJ, Yi J, Guo WJ, Ma C, Huang YG. Comparison of McGrath Series 3 and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With Normal Airway by Inexperienced Anesthetists: A Randomized Study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Jan;95(2):e2514. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002514.
PMID: 26765472BACKGROUNDTaboada M, Estany-Gestal A, Rial M, Carinena A, Martinez A, Selas S, Eiras M, Veiras S, Ferreiroa E, Cardalda B, Lopez C, Calvo A, Fernandez J, Alvarez J, Alcantara JM, Seoane-Pillado T. Impact of Universal Use of the McGrath Videolaryngoscope as a Device for All Intubations in the Cardiac Operating Room. A Prospective Before-After VIDEOLAR-CAR Study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2024 Jul;38(7):1499-1505. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2024.03.016. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
PMID: 38580479BACKGROUNDYamamoto Y, Kimura S, Kuniyoshi H, Hiroe T, Terui T, Kase Y. Novice residents' endotracheal intubation skill retention on a simulated mannequin after rotating at an anaesthesiology department: a randomized controlled study. J Int Med Res. 2023 Oct;51(10):3000605231206313. doi: 10.1177/03000605231206313.
PMID: 37848388BACKGROUNDTaboada M, Bermudez M, Fernandez J, Estany-Gestal A, Amate JJ, Ruido R, Amor M, Mato R, Barreiro C, Martinez P, Ramasco F, Vazquez O, Seoane-Pillado T. Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for tracheal intubation by anesthesia residents in the operating room: The randomized multicenter VILARE trial protocol. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim (Engl Ed). 2026 Feb;73(2):501988. doi: 10.1016/j.redare.2026.501988. Epub 2026 Jan 12.
PMID: 41534770DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
María Bermúdez María Bermúdez López, MD
Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 10, 2025
First Posted
February 24, 2025
Study Start
June 16, 2025
Primary Completion
March 3, 2026
Study Completion
March 24, 2026
Last Updated
March 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share