NCT07235241

Brief Summary

The study was planned using a randomised controlled experimental design to determine the effectiveness of digital game-based teaching in the development of ethical sensitivity and ethical decision-making processes among nursing students.

Trial Health

35
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 13, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

November 19, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2026

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Status Verified

November 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

November 13, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 17, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

EthicsDecision MakingDigital GameNursing Students

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Adapted Ethical Sensitivity Scale for Nursing Students

    This scale determines the ethical sensitivity levels of nursing students. The 7-point Likert-type scale (1=Strongly disagree, 7=Strongly agree) consists of 30 items and six subscales. Items 8, 24, and 29 are reverse-scored. The total score ranges from 30 to 210; a high score indicates high ethical sensitivity. Item averages are evaluated as 7-5.9 (very important), 5.8-5 (important), 4.9-3.1 (neutral), and below 3.1 (unimportant).

    3 times; a week before implementation, a week after implementation, 2 months after implementation

  • The Ethical Dilemma Test in Nursing

    The scale developed under the name 'Nursing Dilemma Test' aims to identify ethical issues in nursing and consists of six scenarios. Each scenario has three sections (A, B, C): Section A (Action): Measures the decision to be made in the face of an ethical dilemma (to act/not to act/to be undecided). Section B (Thinking Style): Determines the 'Principled Thinking' (NPT - importance given to ethical principles) and 'Practical Thinking' (PT - importance given to environmental factors) scores by ranking six statements based on Kohlberg's theory. Section C (Familiarity): Calculates the 'familiarity' score by questioning the case experience. Scoring: NPT Score: ranges from 18 to 66. PT Score: ranges from 6 to 36. Familiarity Score: 6-17 (familiar), 18-30 (unfamiliar). Reliability (Turkish Version): Cronbach's Alpha: NPT (0.59), PT (0.50). Test-Retest: NPT (0.77), PT (0.73).

    3 times; a week before implementation, a week after implementation, 2 months after implementation

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale

    Once; a week after implementation

Study Arms (2)

Experimental group

EXPERIMENTAL

Both the experimental and comparison groups will receive a reminder lecture from the researcher on ethical principles and codes prior to the applications. Participants in the experimental group will simultaneously play digital games and participate in classroom group work after the reminder lesson.

Other: Digital gameOther: In-class group work

Comparison

OTHER

They will only participate in in-class group work.

Other: In-class group work

Interventions

Digital Game: The developed digital game aims to enhance medical students' ethical awareness and decision-making skills. The digital game first provides students with reminders about ethical principles. The game covers a four-week process, focusing on a specific ethical principle each week. Each weekly module presents two cases supported by animated visuals written by the researcher, reviewed by experts, and created by the software company. After watching and reading the cases, students answer related questions. The modules and principles covered are as follows: Week 1 (Do No Harm/Beneficence): Cases related to treatment refusal and palliative care compliance. Week 2 (Autonomy/Respect): Cases related to organ donation decisions and chemotherapy refusal. Week 3 (Justice/Equity): Cases related to resource (air mattress) allocation and patient prioritisation. Week 4 (Confidentiality/Privacy): Cases related to HIV diagnosis confidentiality and psychiatric service confidentiality.

Experimental group

Face-to-face case analysis will be conducted over 4 weeks. These sessions are scheduled outside the course programme, once a week for 40 minutes. A total of 4 cases, each relating to an ethical principle, will be given to students in printed form at the beginning of each session, and they will be asked to analyse them simultaneously. Before the exercises, students will be explained how to analyse the cases.

ComparisonExperimental group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Students must:
  • Have taken and successfully completed the Nursing Ethics course,
  • Be a fourth-year nursing student who has successfully completed all professional courses and is undertaking the 'Professional Training in the Workplace' placement.

You may not qualify if:

  • Students who have not taken the Nursing Ethics course or have failed the course before taking the Professional Training in the Workplace course.
  • Having a conditional grade point average (CGPA \<2.00) up to the period when the data was collected.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Furkan Keles, PhD Student

    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Funda Büyükyılmaz, Prof. Dr.

    Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Furkan Keles, PhD Student

CONTACT

Funda Büyükyılmaz, Prof. Dr.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Masking Details
Participants do not know which group they will be in.
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: A total of two groups, comprising one experimental group and one control group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MSc

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Posted

November 19, 2025

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion

April 1, 2026

Study Completion

June 1, 2026

Last Updated

November 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-11

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share