Comparison of ACB With ACB and BiFeS Combination in Knee Arthroplasty Surgeries
Comparison of the Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of the Combination of Adductor Canal Block and Biceps Femoris Short Head Block Versus Adductor Canal Block Alone in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim is to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of Adductor Canal and Biceps Femoris Short Head Blocks with Adductor Canal Block in patients undergoing Knee Arthroplasty surgery
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 20, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 25, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 25, 2026
November 25, 2025
November 1, 2025
11 months
November 14, 2025
November 20, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Scores
Numerical rating scale is used for pain assessment. The scores of the numerical rating scale changes between 0 to 10 points. 10 points mean "the most severe pain that the patient ever had". 0 point means "there is no pain." Higher scores mean worse outcome.
Postoperative 24 hours
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Total tramadol consumption
Postoperative 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Adductor Canal Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor an adductor canal block, a high-frequency ultrasound probe will be placed on the anterior aspect of the patient's thigh, approximately at the midpoint between the inguinal crease and the medial condyle of the knee. (The depth is generally 3-5 cm). Using an in-plane technique, the needle will be advanced from lateral to medial, passing through the sartorius or vastus medialis muscle, and 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected around the femoral artery.
Combination of Adductor Canal Block and Biceps Femoris Short Head Block
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor adductor canal block, a high-frequency ultrasound probe will be placed on the anterior aspect of the patient's thigh, approximately at the midpoint between the inguinal crease and the medial condyle of the knee. (The depth is generally 3-5 cm). Using in-plane technique, the needle passing through the sartorius or vastus medialis muscle, and 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected around the femoral artery. For BiFeS block, a high-frequency ultrasound probe will be placed on the distal posterior aspect of the thigh. The Biceps Femoris Short Head (BiFeS) muscle will be visualized at the distal lateral part of the femur, near the lateral supracondylar line, and the needle tip will be placed at the interface between the BiFeS and the lateral supracondylar line of the femur. 20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine will be injected, and during the injection, it will be confirmed by ultrasound that the solution lifts the muscle and spreads along the bone surface.
Interventions
20 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult patients over 18 years of age who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia and were I-II-III according to the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) risk classification were included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- patients who did not give consent,
- patients with coagulopathy,
- patients with signs of infection at the block application site,
- patients using anticoagulants,
- patients with known allergies to any of the study drugs,
- patients with unstable hemodynamics,
- patients who could not cooperate during postoperative pain assessment
- patients who wanted to withdraw from the study,
- patients with alcohol and drug addiction,
- patients with musculoskeletal abnormalitie
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sivas Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Sivas, Sivas, 58140, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
OĞUZ GÜNDOĞDU
Sivas Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
- STUDY CHAIR
BUĞRA KARATAŞ
Sivas Cumhuriyet University School of Medicine, Anesthesiology and Reanimation
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 14, 2025
First Posted
November 18, 2025
Study Start
November 20, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 25, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 25, 2026
Last Updated
November 25, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share