The Effect of Different Materials on Students' Learning Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Episiotomy Education: A Randomized Quasi-Experimental Study
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
As part of this research, episiotomy training for third-year midwifery students was transformed into an online video-assisted process due to the pandemic. The aim of the training was to determine the impact of episiotomy repair practice with different materials in a laboratory setting on students' satisfaction and self-confidence and to evaluate the suitability of the simulation design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 15, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 15, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 18, 2025
CompletedNovember 18, 2025
November 1, 2025
3 months
October 2, 2025
November 14, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Simulation Design Scale
The scale consists of 20 items and 5 subscales. The Goals and Information subscale consists of 5 items, the Support subscale consists of 4 items, the Problem Solving subscale consists of 5 items, the Feedback/Guided Reflection subscale consists of 4 items, and the Degree of Realism subscale consists of 2 items. The total Cronbach's alpha value for the scale is 0.90. The scale consists of two sections: one for evaluating the simulation model and one for assessing the importance of the simulation design. The first section is rated as "strongly disagree with the statement," "disagree with the statement," "undecided," "agree with the statement," "strongly agree with the statement," and "not applicable." The second section is rated as "not important," "somewhat important," "undecided," "important," and "very important." Scale scores are obtained by dividing the total and subscale scores by the number of items
Used 5 minutes after the students performed the episiotomy repair, depending on their group.
Student Satisfaction-Self-Confidence in Learning Scale
The scale was developed by Jeffries and Rizzolo (2006) and consists of two subscales: satisfaction with current learning (5 items) and self-confidence in learning (8 items). The scale does not contain any reverse items. Validity and reliability for the Turkish version were conducted by Ünver et al. (2017). The Turkish version of the scale consists of 13 items. It is a five-point Likert-type scale (values range from strongly disagree (1) to strongly agree (5)). The total scale score is obtained by dividing the subscale score by the number of items. A high total score indicates that student satisfaction and self-confidence in learning are high.
It was used 5 minutes after completing standard training. It was also used 5 minutes after the students performed the episiotomy repair, depending on their group.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Personal Information Form
Used 5 minutes after completing standard training.
Study Arms (2)
Episiotomy Simulation Model
EXPERIMENTALThis group received online episiotomy repair training as part of the Normal Birth and Postpartum Term course. The training was delivered as two 60-minute lessons using PowerPoint presentations. The training included a video of episiotomy repair prepared by the researchers. Following the training, the first researcher demonstrated episiotomy repair on a simulation model in a laboratory setting. The students then performed the procedure on chicken breasts.
Chicken Breast Group
EXPERIMENTALThis group received online episiotomy repair training as part of the Normal Birth and Postpartum Term course. The training was delivered as two 60-minute lessons using PowerPoint presentations. The training included watching an episiotomy repair video prepared by the researchers. Following the training, the first researcher demonstrated episiotomy repair on a chicken breast in a laboratory setting. The students then performed the procedure on the chicken breast.
Interventions
Chicken breast is dead animal tissue that can be used to practice repairing lacerations or episiotomies following vaginal delivery. The chicken breast was used. The impact of working with this model on students' satisfaction and self-confidence was investigated, and its suitability for simulation was evaluated.
The Episiotomy Simulation Model provides a realistic tool for practicing the care and repair of lacerations or apisiotomies following vaginal delivery. The impact of working with this model on students' satisfaction and self-confidence was investigated, and the suitability of the simulation was evaluated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Third-year midwifery students who volunteered to participate in the study,
- were taking a course on normal birth and the postpartum period for the first time, had no experience with episiotomy repair, and had not previously observed an episiotomy repair procedure, were included in the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Students who were absent on the day the episiotomy topic was taught.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University
Tokat Province, Tokat Province, 60000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Research Assistant Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 2, 2025
First Posted
November 18, 2025
Study Start
April 25, 2021
Primary Completion
July 15, 2021
Study Completion
July 15, 2021
Last Updated
November 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share