NCT07222462

Brief Summary

The purpose of the ASTRAL Study is to evaluate the effectiveness of LRFA (Lumbar radiofrequency ablation) against a control procedure. The ASTRAL Study will enroll individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP) and randomly assign them to one of three groups: lumbar radiofrequency ablation using conventional electrodes placed parallel to the medial branch nerves (LRFA-C), lumbar radiofrequency ablation using multi-tined electrodes placed perpendicular to the medial branch nerves (LRFA-M), or a simulated radiofrequency ablation procedure.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
300

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
40mo left

Started Feb 2026

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress6%
Feb 2026Aug 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 27, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 29, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 4, 2026

Completed
3.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2029

Expected
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2029

Last Updated

February 9, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3.1 years

First QC Date

October 27, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 5, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

lumbar radiofrequency ablation (LRFA)corticosteroid injections

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Back-related functional limitations

    Measured using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), a 24-item questionnaire that evaluates patients' self-reported functional limitations due to back pain. The total score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 24 (severe disability).

    3 months post-randomization

Secondary Outcomes (15)

  • Back-related functional limitations

    1 month post-randomization

  • Back-related functional limitations

    6 months post-randomization

  • Back-related functional limitations

    12 months post-randomization

  • Procedure duration

    Day of intervention, after procedure

  • Radiation dose

    Day of intervention, after procedure

  • +10 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (80)

  • Quality of life (EuroQoL 5-item)

    3 months post-randomization

  • Quality of life (EuroQoL 5-item)

    1 month post-randomization

  • Quality of life (EuroQoL 5-item)

    6 months post-randomization

  • +77 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

LRFA-C

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with conventional electrodes

Procedure: Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with conventional electrodes (LRFA-C)

LRFA-M

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with multi-tined electrodes

Procedure: Lumbar radiofrequency ablation with multi-tined electrodes (LRFA-M)

Simulated LRFA

SHAM COMPARATOR

Simulated lumbar radiofrequency ablation

Procedure: Simulated lumbar radiofrequency ablation

Interventions

LRFA-M positions a multi-tined thermal radiofrequency electrode at each medial branch nerve to be ablated and administers local anesthetic to the nerve. However, the multi-tined thermal radiofrequency electrode is thought to achieve larger lesions and thus does not require parallel electrode placement; the LRFA-M electrode will be placed perpendicular to the medial branch nerve. All subsequent processes are the same as for LRFA-C. This includes local corticosteroid injection at each ablation site at a total corticosteroid equivalent of 80mg triamcinolone, divided equally among the medial branches targeted; this dose can be reduced as needed according to the medical status of each patient. This process is applied for each medial branch nerve targeted.

LRFA-M

LRFA-C positions a conventional thermal radiofrequency electrode at each medial branch nerve to be ablated and administers local anesthetic to the nerve. Parallel placement of the electrode will be achieved. Once the electrode is in correct position and nerve stimulation testing done, a radiofrequency lesion is generated, achieving a temperature 80°C-90°C, lasting 90-120 seconds. If a 16-gauge or larger electrode is used, no second lesion needs to be made. If an 18-gauge electrode is used, the electrode will be repositioned slightly by withdrawing or repositioning parallel to the 1st ablation site, or by rotating the electrode, and a 2nd lesion made. Local corticosteroid injection is then performed at the ablation site at a total corticosteroid equivalent of 80mg triamcinolone, divided equally among the medial branches targeted; this dose can be reduced as needed according to the medical status of each patient. This process is applied for each medial branch nerve targeted.

LRFA-C

The simulated LRFA control procedure will be performed in an identical fashion to LRFA-M, except 1) after electrode positioning, a neurodestructive lesion will not be made; and 2) a pre-recorded audio recording of the procedure will be played (out of view of the patient, immediately adjacent to the RFA machine) in order to simulate the beeping and other sounds of the machine and to ensure the appropriate length of the simulated procedure. The electrode will remain in place for the 90-120 seconds that lesioning would normally take, but without heat application. The electrode will then be repositioned to simulate a second lesion, also of duration 90-120 seconds. Local corticosteroid injection is then performed at the ablation site at a total corticosteroid equivalent of 80mg triamcinolone, divided equally among the medial branches targeted; this dose can be reduced as needed according to the medical status of each patient. This process is applied for each medial branch nerve targeted.

Simulated LRFA

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • CLBP of duration ≥ 3 months. Low back pain is defined as occurring between the lower posterior margin of the rib cage and the horizontal gluteal fold.
  • Low back pain intensity numerical rating scale (NRS) ≥ 4 with one of the following prior to LRFA: 1) Current low back pain intensity, 2) Average pain over past 7 days, OR 3) Pain intensity without specification of recall period
  • Has had conservative treatments for CLBP (physical therapy, exercise therapy, spinal manipulation, massage, acupuncture, etc.)
  • Candidate for unilateral LRFA (L1-S1 joints; ≤3 levels); or bilateral LRFA (L1-S1 joints; ≤2 levels)
  • 'Positive responses' (≥80% improvement of CLBP pain intensity) to 2 sets of anesthetic-only MBBs (≤0.5cc of local anesthetic)
  • Able to read, speak, and understand English sufficient for informed consent purposes
  • Stated willingness to comply with all study processes and availability for the duration of the study, and provision of a signed and dated informed consent form

You may not qualify if:

  • CLBP attributed primarily to specific spine-related conditions (radiculopathy, lumbar spinal stenosis, spinal instability), 'red flag' conditions (infection / malignancy / fracture), and/or inflammatory arthritis (RA, SpA, etc.)
  • Prior LRFA
  • Prior lumbar facet joint (intra-articular or medial branch nerve) corticosteroid injections (past 6 months)
  • Surgery involving one or more of spinal levels where LRFA is to be performed, in the past 2 years
  • Lumbar fusion involving the spinal levels where LRFA is considered, at any time
  • Prior known severe lumbar central canal stenosis on MRI as defined by Lee (2011): obliteration of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), and marked compression of dural sac, and none of the cauda equina can be visually separated from each other. No new MRIs would be done specifically as part of the study processes.
  • Prior formal diagnosis of fibromyalgia by a rheumatologist (diagnosis by primary care physician or pain medicine specialist is not sufficient)
  • Unstable psychiatric or terminal medical conditions that would limit study participation and the likelihood of follow-up for 12 months post-randomization
  • Pregnancy, being a prisoner, or having a prior formal diagnosis of cognitive impairment by a neuropsychologist or neurologist, confirmed by health record documentation
  • Participant report of prior formal diagnosis of cognitive impairment by a neuropsychologist or neurologist can be obtained, but participant-reported cognitive impairment by a neuropsychologist or neurologist must be confirmed via health record documentation. No new evaluations for cognitive impairment would be done specifically as part of the study processes.
  • Contraindication to local anesthetic, corticosteroid, or any aspects of LRFA
  • Cannot reach MBB targets with 11.9cm needle
  • Major planned life events over the next 4 months that might interfere with study participation (e.g., major abdominal or chest surgery or extended vacation)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Emory Musculoskeletal Institute

Atlanta, Georgia, 30329, United States

RECRUITING

Cleveland Clinic

Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States

RECRUITING

University of Utah Orthopaedic Center/PM&R

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84108, United States

NOT YET RECRUITING

Related Links

Study Officials

  • Pradeep Suri, MD

    University of Washington

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Janna Friedly, MD

    University of Washington

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Research Study Coordinator

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Multiple Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 27, 2025

First Posted

October 29, 2025

Study Start

February 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2029

Last Updated

February 9, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Data types for the full ASTRAL sample will include patient-reported outcome data; clinical and sociodemographic data entered by participants or by research staff at the clinical research center sites (CRCs) based on electronic health record (EHR) review; and adverse event monitoring data entered by participants or by research staff at the CRCs after EHR review. These de-identified, individual level data will be made available through a data repository consistent with NIH recommendations at the time of, for sharing to approved users via CSV files.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
We will share a complete, cleaned, de-identified copy of the locked final dataset used in conducting the final analyses upon which the accepted primary study publication is based. Data will be made available no later than when the first manuscript reporting on 12-month outcomes is published, or end of the performance period, whichever comes first. A complete dataset will be permanently archived and available through Zenodo, a generalist repository providing long-term access to and preservation of data.
Access Criteria
Registered and approved users of the data must propose specific research questions in an analysis plan and sign a data use agreement (DUA). Documentation will be made available including the study protocol, the final data management and sharing plan, data dictionary/codebook, a statistical analysis plan, data collection instruments, informed consent document, and citations to the main publications based on analyses of data being deposited. For approved requests, data made available via Zenodo will include the de-identified analyzable dataset in CSV format, data variable and value labeling guidelines, and analytic code (including code used to create derived variables).

Locations