Acute Cryotherapy on Musculoskeletal Function and Biomarkers
Effects of Acute Cryotherapy on Musculoskeletal Function and Biomarkers for Inflammation, Oxidative Stress, and Muscle Damage
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In 2020, Dubois and Esculier proposed a paradigm shift in the acute management of musculoskeletal injuries, advocating for the transition from the traditional PRICE protocol- Protect, Rest, Ice, Compression, Elevation-to the more holistic PEACE \& LOVE framework. This updated model emphasizes Protection, Elevation, Avoiding anti-inflammatories, Compression, and Education, followed by Load, Optimism, Vascularization, and Exercise. Notably, the PEACE \& LOVE approach omits the use of ice, a decision that has sparked considerable debate. While the rationale centers on avoiding interference with the natural inflammatory and regenerative processes, this omission stands in contrast to a substantial body of animal research suggesting that cryotherapy can mitigate secondary tissue injury by reducing inflammation and metabolic activity. Despite its widespread clinical use, human studies have yet to provide conclusive evidence supporting or refuting the efficacy of cryotherapy in acute injury management, leaving clinicians to navigate between tradition, emerging evidence, and evolving philosophies of care. Even though it is important to consider natural inflammation for a better regenerative process, animal models have shown that the original injury can elicit oxidative stress, which will enhance cellular damage (secondary damage) and inflammation. Clinically, it is unknown if this secondary damage would increase functional impairment. Therefore, this proposal will determine if cryotherapy can decrease secondary damage, after exercise-induced muscle damage, and if this decrease is associated to lower inflammation, oxidative stress and functional impairments.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 8, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 15, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 15, 2026
October 8, 2025
October 1, 2025
7 months
October 1, 2025
October 1, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction (MVIC)
Laid down on an isokinetic dynamometer system (Humac-Norm, Computer Sports Medicine, inc., Stoughton, MA), participants will be asked to flex their non-dominant arm (pull with their hand) against the dynamometer. They will perform 3 tries with 1 minute between tries and the peak value will be considered the MVIC.
From enrollment to the end of study at 12 days
Peak Pressure Threshold (PPT)
PPT is the application of an algometer, which measure pressure on a specific body point (see figure below), while asking the participant 2 questions: 1) tell me when the pressure becomes pain and 2) how much pain you felt from 0 to 100, where 0 is no pain and 100 is the larger pain you have ever experienced. PPT will be performed over the flexor muscles (biceps brachialis) of the non-dominant arm.
From enrollment to the end of study at 12 days.
Creatine kinase
Blood biomarker of muscle damage. Blood draws will be performed before and 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after EIMD.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 days
Interleukin-6
Blood biomarker of inflammation. Blood draws will be performed before and 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after EIMD.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 days
8-isoprostane
Blood biomarker of oxidative stress. Blood draws will be performed before and 0, 24, 48, 72, and 96 hours after EIMD.
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 days
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Arm girth
From enrollment to the end of study at 12 days.
Active Range of Motion (ROM)
From enrollment to the end of study at 12 days.
C-reactive protein
From enrollment to the end of treatment at 5 days.
Study Arms (3)
Control-control
NO INTERVENTIONThis arm will include no intervention and only functional assessments and blood draws for biomarkers.
Control
PLACEBO COMPARATORThis arm will have eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage on day 0 and then 15-min of room temperature cold-pack immediately after and then for 4 more days every 24 hours.
Cryotherapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm will have eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage on day 0 and then 15-min of cold (-5°C) cold-pack immediately after and then for 4 more days every 24 hours.
Interventions
A cold (-5°C) cold-pack for 15 minutes every 24 hours for 5 days
3 sets of 15 repetitions of eccentric contractions at 80% of 1RM. This is to induced a controlled muscle damage in 2 of the 3 arms.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- apparently healthy
- normotensive
- non-smokers (all tobacco products including e-cigarettes)
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiovascular diseases (including hypertension)
- pregnancy
- any musculoskeletal injury 6 months prior the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
The University of Texas at El Paso, Rehabilitation Sciences Complex
El Paso, Texas, 79968, United States
Related Publications (9)
Qu C, Wu Z, Xu M, Qin F, Dong Y, Wang Z, Zhao J. Cryotherapy Models and Timing-Sequence Recovery of Exercise-Induced Muscle Damage in Middle- and Long-Distance Runners. J Athl Train. 2020 Apr;55(4):329-335. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-529-18. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
PMID: 32160058BACKGROUNDPooley S, Spendiff O, Allen M, Moir HJ. Comparative efficacy of active recovery and cold water immersion as post-match recovery interventions in elite youth soccer. J Sports Sci. 2020 Jun-Jun;38(11-12):1423-1431. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1660448. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
PMID: 31456474BACKGROUNDRose C, Edwards KM, Siegler J, Graham K, Caillaud C. Whole-body Cryotherapy as a Recovery Technique after Exercise: A Review of the Literature. Int J Sports Med. 2017 Dec;38(14):1049-1060. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-114861. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
PMID: 29161748BACKGROUNDKwiecien SY, McHugh MP, Hicks KM, Keane KM, Howatson G. Prolonging the duration of cooling does not enhance recovery following a marathon. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2021 Jan;31(1):21-29. doi: 10.1111/sms.13822. Epub 2020 Sep 25.
PMID: 32901996BACKGROUNDSasaki R, Sakamoto J, Kondo Y, Oga S, Takeshita I, Honda Y, Kataoka H, Origuchi T, Okita M. Effects of Cryotherapy Applied at Different Temperatures on Inflammatory Pain During the Acute Phase of Arthritis in Rats. Phys Ther. 2021 Feb 4;101(2):pzaa211. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzaa211.
PMID: 33351944BACKGROUNDMerrick MA, Rankin JM, Andres FA, Hinman CL. A preliminary examination of cryotherapy and secondary injury in skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1999 Nov;31(11):1516-21. doi: 10.1097/00005768-199911000-00004.
PMID: 10589851BACKGROUNDAllan R, Malone J, Alexander J, Vorajee S, Ihsan M, Gregson W, Kwiecien S, Mawhinney C. Cold for centuries: a brief history of cryotherapies to improve health, injury and post-exercise recovery. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2022 May;122(5):1153-1162. doi: 10.1007/s00421-022-04915-5. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
PMID: 35195747BACKGROUNDKwiecien SY, McHugh MP. The cold truth: the role of cryotherapy in the treatment of injury and recovery from exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Aug;121(8):2125-2142. doi: 10.1007/s00421-021-04683-8. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PMID: 33877402BACKGROUNDDubois B, Esculier JF. Soft-tissue injuries simply need PEACE and LOVE. Br J Sports Med. 2020 Jan;54(2):72-73. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101253. Epub 2019 Aug 3. No abstract available.
PMID: 31377722BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor and Chair
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 1, 2025
First Posted
October 8, 2025
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 15, 2026
Last Updated
October 8, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I might share un-identified data when submitting manuscripts, if asked to do so.