NCT07211204

Brief Summary

This study compares the efficacy of cytology (Pap smear) with the molecular screening in their ability to detect reactive cellular changes in the cervix among an open population

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2026

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

June 3, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 7, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 27, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 27, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 27, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

March 3, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

June 3, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 27, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Cervical precursor lesionsReactive cellular changesCervical cancer

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (5)

  • Liquid-based Cytology LBC results (categorical)

    Study of cells -of the cervix- using a microscope. Cytology is the official screening test for cervical precursor lesions and/or cervical cancer in most countries. Cytology's results: Negative to lesion/malignancy. Negative with inflammation. Negative with sexually transmitted infection. Negative with HPV/Herpes cytopathic changes. Negative with atrophy. Positive with ASC-US. Positive with ASC-H. Positive with AGUS. Positive with CIN-1. Positive with CIN-2. Positive with CIN-3. Positive with carcinoma in situ. Positive with LSIL/HSIL. Positive with adenocarcinoma. Positive with Cancer/Malignancy. Positive with probable lesion/cancer/malignancy.

    Cervical smear will be taken during the first visit (Day 1). LBC results will be available within a maximum of 20 days after sampling. This test will be performed by a Licensed Clinical laboratory. All participants will be subjected to this test.

  • Molecular screening results (dichotomic)

    Molecular screening detects three human protein biomarkers in human sera by Western blot and ELISA. Western blot results are qualitative (band intensity units or IU) and ELISA results are quantitative (ng/mL). The final result for molecular screening test is computed as follows: Negative. Only if the three independent biomarkers are below their cutoff values. Positive. If any of the three independent biomarkers is equal to or greater than its cutoff value. Cutoff values are as follows: Biomarker 1 positive \>= 1.37 IU. Biomarker 1 negative \< 1.37 IU. Biomarker 2 positive \>= 17.74 ng/mL. Biomarker 2 negative \< 17.74 ng/mL. Biomarker 3 positive \>= 0.38 IU. Biomarker 3 negative \< 0.38 IU.

    Blood samples will be taken during the first visit (Day 1). Molecular screening results will be available within a maximum of 20 days after sampling. All participants will be subjected to this test.

  • HPV test results (categorical)

    HPV test will detect fifteen different high-risk genotypes by PCR: HPV-16 genotype. HPV-18 genotype. HPV-pool (including HPV-31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 67, and 68 genotypes). The final test result will be assigned as follows: Positive HPV test: If at least one of the fifteen genotypes is detected. Negative HPV test: Only if none of the fifteen genotypes are detected.

    Cervical smear will be taken during the first visit (Day 1). HPV test results will be available within a maximum of 20 days after sampling. This test will be performed by a Licensed Clinical laboratory. All participants will be subjected to this test.

  • Colposcopy diagnosis (categorical)

    Colposcopy is the exploration of the female genitalia -vulva, vagina, and cervix- using a lighted magnifying instrument (colposcope). Its accuracy is higher than that of the cytology. If the gynecologist detects/suspects a lesion or malignancy during colposcopy, a biopsy will be drawn for histopathologic analysis. Colposcopy results: Negative with no alterations. Negative with inflammation. Negative with condyloma/condylomatosis/HPV. Negative with atrophy. Negative with squamous metaplasia. Negative with ectropion/ectopy/cervical erosion/cervical eversion/glandular eversion. Negative with Nabothian cysts. Negative with cervical polyp. Negative with Lichen sclerosus. Positive with CIN-1. Positive with CIN-2. Positive with CIN-3. Positive with carcinoma in situ CIN-3. Positive with neoplasia/invasive neoplasia. Positive with LSIL/HSIL. Positive with probable lesion/CIN/LSIL/HSIL.

    Colposcopy will be performed during the first visit (Day 1). This diagnostic test will be performed by a licensed gynecologist. All participants will be subjected to this diagnostic test. Colposcopy will be used as a reference test.

  • Histopathology diagnosis (cathegorical)

    Histopathology is the microscopic analysis of a stained slide of a cervical biopsy by a licensed pathologist. The standard staining is H\&E (hematoxylin and eosin). Histopathology results: Negative with normal tissue. Negative with cervicitis. Negative with HPV/Herpes infection. Positive with CIN-1. Positive with CIN-2. Positive with CIN-3. Positive with carcinoma in situ CIN-3. Positive LSIL/HSIL. Positive with microinvasive/invasive cancer. Positive with adenocarcinoma. Positive with sarcoma and other tumors. Positive with carcinoma of unknown primary origin/unspecified malignancy.

    The biopsy for histopathology will be drawn during the first visit (Day 1). Biopsies will be drawn only from women with positive colposcopy results. Histopathology is the gold standard for cervical cancer diagnosis.

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Body Mass Index (BMI)

    During the first visit (Day 1).

  • Blood pressure

    During the first visit (Day 1).

  • Ethnicity

    During the first visit (Day 1) by clinical interview.

  • Race

    During the first visit (Day 1) by clinical interview.

  • Age at Menarche

    During the first visit (Day 1) by clinical interview.

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • p16 immunohistochemistry results (dichotomic)

    This test will be performed using the remaining tissue from randomly selected biopsies. None of the participants will be biopsied more than once. Biopsies will be drawn during the first visit (Day 1) only if a lesion/malignancy is detected in colposcopy.

Study Arms (2)

Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix

OTHER

Participants will be drawn from an open population, so they will be asymptomatic for any cervical disease. Based on colposcopy, there will be four clinical groups: negative control (CTR), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL, CIN-1), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL, CIN-2/3), and cervical cancer (CC).

Procedure: Physical examinationOther: Liquid-based cytologyOther: Molecular screeningOther: HPV DNA testDiagnostic Test: Colposcopy

Histopathology of cervical biopsy

OTHER

Based on colposcopy, participants in the groups LSIL/CIN-1, HSIL/CIN-2/3, and cervical cancer (CC) will be biopsied.

Diagnostic Test: Histopathology

Interventions

Physical examination and interview for obtaining a medical record

Also known as: Clinical examination
Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix

Screening test for cervical precursor lesions and/or cancer. LBC is a procedure in which a cervical smear is examined under the microscope.

Also known as: LBC
Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix

The molecular screening detects three human biomarkers associated with cervical precursor lesions and/or cervical cancer. Biomarker detection is done by Western blot and ELISA in human sera.

Also known as: Circulating biomarker screening
Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix

HPV DNA detection is performed using a cervical swab.

Also known as: HPV PCR test, HPV screening, HPV detection, Human papillomavirus DNA test
Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix
ColposcopyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

A diagnostic procedure to visually examine the cervix, vagina, and vulva with a colposcope.

Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix
HistopathologyDIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Is the definitive diagnosis of cervical precursor lesions and cervical cancer. It is the microscopic study of diseased cells and tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin.

Also known as: Cervical biopsy, Biopsy, Histopathologic examination, Histopathologic analysis, Hematoxylin and eosin stain (H&E) in histopathology
Histopathology of cervical biopsy

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 85 Years
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be in good general health.
  • Age 18-85 years.
  • A minimum fast of 6 hours and no more than 12 hours.
  • Refrain from sexual intercourse 24 hours before the study.
  • Give written informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Having a subtotal, total, or radical hysterectomy.
  • Being pregnant or suspected of being pregnant. A rapid urine test will be performed. If the result is positive, the patient will be excluded from the protocol and referred for prenatal care.
  • Being under oncological treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy).
  • Being on their period.
  • Have a previous confirmatory diagnosis of HIV and/or hepatitis infection.
  • Having taken antiplatelet medications, e.g., acetylsalicylic acid, at least 24 hours before the study.
  • Discontinuation Criteria:
  • If the participant refuses any of the study procedures.
  • If the study gynecologist detects that the participant has had a hysterectomy.
  • If the volume of the biological samples is insufficient (less than 10 mL for the blood sample).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Clinica Reina Madre Metepec

San Mateo Atenco, State of Mexico, 52105, Mexico

Location

Related Publications (37)

  • Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yucel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15.

    PMID: 33380887BACKGROUND
  • Rozemeijer K, Penning C, Siebers AG, Naber SK, Matthijsse SM, van Ballegooijen M, van Kemenade FJ, de Kok IM. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates. Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jan;27(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0678-1. Epub 2015 Oct 12.

    PMID: 26458884BACKGROUND
  • Bell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013 Jan 21;346:e8668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8668.

    PMID: 23338004BACKGROUND
  • Hajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

    PMID: 24582925BACKGROUND
  • DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.

    PMID: 3203132BACKGROUND
  • Hu ZY, Xiao L, Bode AM, Dong Z, Cao Y. Glycolytic genes in cancer cells are more than glucose metabolic regulators. J Mol Med (Berl). 2014 Aug;92(8):837-45. doi: 10.1007/s00109-014-1174-x. Epub 2014 Jun 8.

    PMID: 24906457BACKGROUND
  • Xue C, Gu X, Li G, Bao Z, Li L. Expression and Functional Roles of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4A Family Proteins in Human Cancers. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Nov 19;9:711965. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.711965. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34869305BACKGROUND
  • Li H, Liu J, Shen S, Dai D, Cheng S, Dong X, Sun L, Guo X. Pan-cancer analysis of alternative splicing regulator heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) family and their prognostic potential. J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Oct;24(19):11111-11119. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15558. Epub 2020 Sep 11.

    PMID: 32915499BACKGROUND
  • Dreyfuss G, Matunis MJ, Pinol-Roma S, Burd CG. hnRNP proteins and the biogenesis of mRNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:289-321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.001445. No abstract available.

    PMID: 8352591BACKGROUND
  • Checa-Rojas A, Delgadillo-Silva LF, Velasco-Herrera MDC, Andrade-Dominguez A, Gil J, Santillan O, Lozano L, Toledo-Leyva A, Ramirez-Torres A, Talamas-Rohana P, Encarnacion-Guevara S. GSTM3 and GSTP1: novel players driving tumor progression in cervical cancer. Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 24;9(31):21696-21714. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24796. eCollection 2018 Apr 24.

    PMID: 29774096BACKGROUND
  • William W, Ware A, Basaza-Ejiri AH, Obungoloch J. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images. Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Feb 12;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0634-5.

    PMID: 30755214BACKGROUND
  • Shin MB, Garcia PJ, Saldarriaga EM, Fiestas JL, Asbjornsdottir KH, Iribarren SJ, Barnabas RV, Gimbel S. Cost of community-based human papillomavirus self-sampling in Peru: A micro-costing study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Apr;8:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100160. Epub 2021 Dec 29.

    PMID: 35528707BACKGROUND
  • Giannella L, Di Giuseppe J, Delli Carpini G, Grelloni C, Fichera M, Sartini G, Caimmi S, Natalini L, Ciavattini A. HPV-Negative Adenocarcinomas of the Uterine Cervix: From Molecular Characterization to Clinical Implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;23(23):15022. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315022.

    PMID: 36499345BACKGROUND
  • Jenkins D, Molijn A, Kazem S, Pirog EC, Alemany L, de Sanjose S, Dinjens W, Quint W. Molecular and pathological basis of HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinoma seen in a global study. Int J Cancer. 2020 Nov 1;147(9):2526-2536. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33124. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

    PMID: 32474915BACKGROUND
  • Lee JE, Chung Y, Rhee S, Kim TH. Untold story of human cervical cancers: HPV-negative cervical cancer. BMB Rep. 2022 Sep;55(9):429-438. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2022.55.9.042.

    PMID: 35725012BACKGROUND
  • Najib FS, Hashemi M, Shiravani Z, Poordast T, Sharifi S, Askary E. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Detecting Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Cervix. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(3):453-458. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01118-2. Epub 2020 Jun 23.

    PMID: 33013127BACKGROUND
  • Mayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, Walter SD, Hanley J, Ferenczy A, Ratnam S, Coutlee F, Franco EL; Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial Study Group. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 18;357(16):1579-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071430.

    PMID: 17942871BACKGROUND
  • Kitchener HC, Castle PE, Cox JT. Chapter 7: Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.113.

    PMID: 16950019BACKGROUND
  • Bravington A, Chen H, Dyson J, Jones L, Dalgliesh C, Bryan A, Patnick J, Macleod U. Challenges and opportunities for cervical screening in women over the age of 50 years: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Nov 24;72(725):e873-e881. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0036. Print 2022 Dec.

    PMID: 36192359BACKGROUND
  • Shin HY, Song SY, Jun JK, Kim KY, Kang P. Barriers and strategies for cervical cancer screening: What do female university students know and want? PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0257529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257529. eCollection 2021.

    PMID: 34610022BACKGROUND
  • Petersen Z, Jaca A, Ginindza TG, Maseko G, Takatshana S, Ndlovu P, Zondi N, Zungu N, Varghese C, Hunting G, Parham G, Simelela P, Moyo S. Barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening services in low-and-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02043-y.

    PMID: 36461001BACKGROUND
  • Akinlotan M, Bolin JN, Helduser J, Ojinnaka C, Lichorad A, McClellan D. Cervical Cancer Screening Barriers and Risk Factor Knowledge Among Uninsured Women. J Community Health. 2017 Aug;42(4):770-778. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0316-9.

    PMID: 28155005BACKGROUND
  • Zhang L, Mosquera I, Lucas E, Rol ML, Carvalho AL, Basu P; CanScreen5 collaborators. CanScreen5, a global repository for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs. Nat Med. 2023 May;29(5):1135-1145. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02315-6. Epub 2023 Apr 27.

    PMID: 37106168BACKGROUND
  • Mitra A, Tzafetas M, Lyons D, Fotopoulou C, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: screening and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016 Aug 2;77(8):C118-23. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.8.C118. No abstract available.

    PMID: 27487071BACKGROUND
  • Alimena S, Davis J, Fichorova RN, Feldman S. The vaginal microbiome: A complex milieu affecting risk of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2022 Aug;46(4):100877. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100877. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

    PMID: 35709613BACKGROUND
  • Johnson CA, James D, Marzan A, Armaos M. Cervical Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Management. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;35(2):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 14.

    PMID: 30878194BACKGROUND
  • Ribeiro AA, Costa MC, Alves RR, Villa LL, Saddi VA, Carneiro MA, Zeferino LC, Rabelo-Santos SH. HPV infection and cervical neoplasia: associated risk factors. Infect Agent Cancer. 2015 May 26;10:16. doi: 10.1186/s13027-015-0011-3. eCollection 2015.

    PMID: 26244052BACKGROUND
  • Vesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, Burda BU, Senger CA, Lutz K. Risk factors and other epidemiologic considerations for cervical cancer screening: a narrative review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):698-705, W216. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00377. Epub 2011 Oct 17.

    PMID: 22006929BACKGROUND
  • International Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Cervical carcinoma and sexual behavior: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 15,461 women with cervical carcinoma and 29,164 women without cervical carcinoma from 21 epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1186. Epub 2009 Mar 31.

    PMID: 19336546BACKGROUND
  • Plummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Meijer CJ, Snijders P, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Munoz N; IARC Multi-centre Cervical Cancer Study Group. Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case--control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2003 Nov;14(9):805-14. doi: 10.1023/b:caco.0000003811.98261.3e.

    PMID: 14682438BACKGROUND
  • Collins S, Rollason TP, Young LS, Woodman CB. Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women: a longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jan;46(2):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.015. Epub 2009 Oct 12.

    PMID: 19819687BACKGROUND
  • Tekalegn Y, Sahiledengle B, Woldeyohannes D, Atlaw D, Degno S, Desta F, Bekele K, Aseffa T, Gezahegn H, Kene C. High parity is associated with increased risk of cervical cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455065221075904. doi: 10.1177/17455065221075904.

    PMID: 35114865BACKGROUND
  • Bezabih M, Tessema F, Sengi H, Deribew A. Risk Factors Associated with Invasive Cervical Carcinoma among Women Attending Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: A Case Control Study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2015 Oct;25(4):345-52. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i4.8.

    PMID: 26949299BACKGROUND
  • McGraw SL, Ferrante JM. Update on prevention and screening of cervical cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;5(4):744-52. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.744.

    PMID: 25302174BACKGROUND
  • Hwang LY, Ma Y, Benningfield SM, Clayton L, Hanson EN, Jay J, Jonte J, Godwin de Medina C, Moscicki AB. Factors that influence the rate of epithelial maturation in the cervix in healthy young women. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Feb;44(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.10.006.

    PMID: 19167657BACKGROUND
  • Ruiz AM, Ruiz JE, Gavilanes AV, Eriksson T, Lehtinen M, Perez G, Sings HL, James MK, Haupt RM; FUTURE I and II Study Group. Proximity of first sexual intercourse to menarche and risk of high-grade cervical disease. J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 15;206(12):1887-96. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis612. Epub 2012 Oct 12.

    PMID: 23066159BACKGROUND
  • Mok, S. C., Wong, K. K., Lu, K. H., Munger, K. & Nagymanyoki, Z. Molecular basis of gynecologic diseases. in Essential Concepts in Molecular Pathology 409-424 (Elsevier, 2020). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813257-9.00023-1.

    BACKGROUND

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atypical Squamous Cells of the CervixUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Interventions

Restraint, PhysicalHuman Papillomavirus DNA TestsColposcopyBiopsy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Precancerous ConditionsNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesMorphological and Microscopic FindingsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsUterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by Site

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior ControlTherapeuticsImmobilizationInvestigative TechniquesMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesClinical Laboratory TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisGenetic TechniquesDiagnostic Techniques, Obstetrical and GynecologicalEndoscopyDiagnostic Techniques, SurgicalMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresSurgical Procedures, OperativeObstetric Surgical ProceduresGynecologic Surgical ProceduresUrogenital Surgical ProceduresCytodiagnosisCytological TechniquesSpecimen Handling

Study Officials

  • Leopoldo E Gatica-Galina, MD in OB/GY & Gynecol Oncol

    Clinica Reina Madre Metepec

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
Given this is a screening study: I) Participant. All enrolled participants will be asymptomatic women. Group assignment will be defined after colposcopy or histopathology (when applicable). II) Care Provider. The gynecologist will not have a priori knowledge of the condition of the participant. During colposcopy only those participants with abnormal results will be biopsied. III) Investigator. None of the investigators performing the tests (cytology, HPV detection, molecular screening, or histopathology) will know each other's results.
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Group 1. All participants will receive a colposcopy, Pap smear, and a venipuncture. Diagnosis by colposcopy will set four clinical groups: negative control (CTR), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions LSIL (CIN-1), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions HSIL (CIN-2/3), and cervical cancer (CC). Group 2. The participants in groups LSIL, HSIL, and CC will be biopsied. The histopathology analysis of the biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

June 3, 2025

First Posted

October 7, 2025

Study Start

February 27, 2026

Primary Completion

February 27, 2026

Study Completion

February 27, 2026

Last Updated

March 3, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All de-identified individual participant data will be publicly available in the supplementary material associated with the scientific publication.

Locations