Study Stopped
The study did not start, i.e., no participants were enrolled, because the Mexican Regulatory Authority (COFEPRIS) did not authorize the amendments to the protocol.
Comparison Of Cytology And Molecular Screening For Detecting Cervical Reactive Cellular Changes In General Population
Study To Compare The Efficacy Of Cervical Cytology With Molecular Screening In The Detection Of Reactive Cellular Changes In The Cervix In An Open Population
2 other identifiers
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the efficacy of cytology (Pap smear) with the molecular screening in their ability to detect reactive cellular changes in the cervix among an open population
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Feb 2026
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 7, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 27, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 27, 2026
CompletedMarch 3, 2026
February 1, 2026
Same day
June 3, 2025
February 27, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Liquid-based Cytology LBC results (categorical)
Study of cells -of the cervix- using a microscope. Cytology is the official screening test for cervical precursor lesions and/or cervical cancer in most countries. Cytology's results: Negative to lesion/malignancy. Negative with inflammation. Negative with sexually transmitted infection. Negative with HPV/Herpes cytopathic changes. Negative with atrophy. Positive with ASC-US. Positive with ASC-H. Positive with AGUS. Positive with CIN-1. Positive with CIN-2. Positive with CIN-3. Positive with carcinoma in situ. Positive with LSIL/HSIL. Positive with adenocarcinoma. Positive with Cancer/Malignancy. Positive with probable lesion/cancer/malignancy.
Cervical smear will be taken during the first visit (Day 1). LBC results will be available within a maximum of 20 days after sampling. This test will be performed by a Licensed Clinical laboratory. All participants will be subjected to this test.
Molecular screening results (dichotomic)
Molecular screening detects three human protein biomarkers in human sera by Western blot and ELISA. Western blot results are qualitative (band intensity units or IU) and ELISA results are quantitative (ng/mL). The final result for molecular screening test is computed as follows: Negative. Only if the three independent biomarkers are below their cutoff values. Positive. If any of the three independent biomarkers is equal to or greater than its cutoff value. Cutoff values are as follows: Biomarker 1 positive \>= 1.37 IU. Biomarker 1 negative \< 1.37 IU. Biomarker 2 positive \>= 17.74 ng/mL. Biomarker 2 negative \< 17.74 ng/mL. Biomarker 3 positive \>= 0.38 IU. Biomarker 3 negative \< 0.38 IU.
Blood samples will be taken during the first visit (Day 1). Molecular screening results will be available within a maximum of 20 days after sampling. All participants will be subjected to this test.
HPV test results (categorical)
HPV test will detect fifteen different high-risk genotypes by PCR: HPV-16 genotype. HPV-18 genotype. HPV-pool (including HPV-31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, 67, and 68 genotypes). The final test result will be assigned as follows: Positive HPV test: If at least one of the fifteen genotypes is detected. Negative HPV test: Only if none of the fifteen genotypes are detected.
Cervical smear will be taken during the first visit (Day 1). HPV test results will be available within a maximum of 20 days after sampling. This test will be performed by a Licensed Clinical laboratory. All participants will be subjected to this test.
Colposcopy diagnosis (categorical)
Colposcopy is the exploration of the female genitalia -vulva, vagina, and cervix- using a lighted magnifying instrument (colposcope). Its accuracy is higher than that of the cytology. If the gynecologist detects/suspects a lesion or malignancy during colposcopy, a biopsy will be drawn for histopathologic analysis. Colposcopy results: Negative with no alterations. Negative with inflammation. Negative with condyloma/condylomatosis/HPV. Negative with atrophy. Negative with squamous metaplasia. Negative with ectropion/ectopy/cervical erosion/cervical eversion/glandular eversion. Negative with Nabothian cysts. Negative with cervical polyp. Negative with Lichen sclerosus. Positive with CIN-1. Positive with CIN-2. Positive with CIN-3. Positive with carcinoma in situ CIN-3. Positive with neoplasia/invasive neoplasia. Positive with LSIL/HSIL. Positive with probable lesion/CIN/LSIL/HSIL.
Colposcopy will be performed during the first visit (Day 1). This diagnostic test will be performed by a licensed gynecologist. All participants will be subjected to this diagnostic test. Colposcopy will be used as a reference test.
Histopathology diagnosis (cathegorical)
Histopathology is the microscopic analysis of a stained slide of a cervical biopsy by a licensed pathologist. The standard staining is H\&E (hematoxylin and eosin). Histopathology results: Negative with normal tissue. Negative with cervicitis. Negative with HPV/Herpes infection. Positive with CIN-1. Positive with CIN-2. Positive with CIN-3. Positive with carcinoma in situ CIN-3. Positive LSIL/HSIL. Positive with microinvasive/invasive cancer. Positive with adenocarcinoma. Positive with sarcoma and other tumors. Positive with carcinoma of unknown primary origin/unspecified malignancy.
The biopsy for histopathology will be drawn during the first visit (Day 1). Biopsies will be drawn only from women with positive colposcopy results. Histopathology is the gold standard for cervical cancer diagnosis.
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Body Mass Index (BMI)
During the first visit (Day 1).
Blood pressure
During the first visit (Day 1).
Ethnicity
During the first visit (Day 1) by clinical interview.
Race
During the first visit (Day 1) by clinical interview.
Age at Menarche
During the first visit (Day 1) by clinical interview.
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
p16 immunohistochemistry results (dichotomic)
This test will be performed using the remaining tissue from randomly selected biopsies. None of the participants will be biopsied more than once. Biopsies will be drawn during the first visit (Day 1) only if a lesion/malignancy is detected in colposcopy.
Study Arms (2)
Screening for reactive cellular changes in the cervix
OTHERParticipants will be drawn from an open population, so they will be asymptomatic for any cervical disease. Based on colposcopy, there will be four clinical groups: negative control (CTR), low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL, CIN-1), high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL, CIN-2/3), and cervical cancer (CC).
Histopathology of cervical biopsy
OTHERBased on colposcopy, participants in the groups LSIL/CIN-1, HSIL/CIN-2/3, and cervical cancer (CC) will be biopsied.
Interventions
Physical examination and interview for obtaining a medical record
Screening test for cervical precursor lesions and/or cancer. LBC is a procedure in which a cervical smear is examined under the microscope.
The molecular screening detects three human biomarkers associated with cervical precursor lesions and/or cervical cancer. Biomarker detection is done by Western blot and ELISA in human sera.
HPV DNA detection is performed using a cervical swab.
A diagnostic procedure to visually examine the cervix, vagina, and vulva with a colposcope.
Is the definitive diagnosis of cervical precursor lesions and cervical cancer. It is the microscopic study of diseased cells and tissues stained with hematoxylin and eosin.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be in good general health.
- Age 18-85 years.
- A minimum fast of 6 hours and no more than 12 hours.
- Refrain from sexual intercourse 24 hours before the study.
- Give written informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Having a subtotal, total, or radical hysterectomy.
- Being pregnant or suspected of being pregnant. A rapid urine test will be performed. If the result is positive, the patient will be excluded from the protocol and referred for prenatal care.
- Being under oncological treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy).
- Being on their period.
- Have a previous confirmatory diagnosis of HIV and/or hepatitis infection.
- Having taken antiplatelet medications, e.g., acetylsalicylic acid, at least 24 hours before the study.
- Discontinuation Criteria:
- If the participant refuses any of the study procedures.
- If the study gynecologist detects that the participant has had a hysterectomy.
- If the volume of the biological samples is insufficient (less than 10 mL for the blood sample).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Clinica Reina Madre Metepec
San Mateo Atenco, State of Mexico, 52105, Mexico
Related Publications (37)
Serdar CC, Cihan M, Yucel D, Serdar MA. Sample size, power and effect size revisited: simplified and practical approaches in pre-clinical, clinical and laboratory studies. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Feb 15;31(1):010502. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.010502. Epub 2020 Dec 15.
PMID: 33380887BACKGROUNDRozemeijer K, Penning C, Siebers AG, Naber SK, Matthijsse SM, van Ballegooijen M, van Kemenade FJ, de Kok IM. Comparing SurePath, ThinPrep, and conventional cytology as primary test method: SurePath is associated with increased CIN II+ detection rates. Cancer Causes Control. 2016 Jan;27(1):15-25. doi: 10.1007/s10552-015-0678-1. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
PMID: 26458884BACKGROUNDBell ML, Kenward MG, Fairclough DL, Horton NJ. Differential dropout and bias in randomised controlled trials: when it matters and when it may not. BMJ. 2013 Jan 21;346:e8668. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e8668.
PMID: 23338004BACKGROUNDHajian-Tilaki K. Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics. J Biomed Inform. 2014 Apr;48:193-204. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.02.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
PMID: 24582925BACKGROUNDDeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45.
PMID: 3203132BACKGROUNDHu ZY, Xiao L, Bode AM, Dong Z, Cao Y. Glycolytic genes in cancer cells are more than glucose metabolic regulators. J Mol Med (Berl). 2014 Aug;92(8):837-45. doi: 10.1007/s00109-014-1174-x. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
PMID: 24906457BACKGROUNDXue C, Gu X, Li G, Bao Z, Li L. Expression and Functional Roles of Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4A Family Proteins in Human Cancers. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021 Nov 19;9:711965. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.711965. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34869305BACKGROUNDLi H, Liu J, Shen S, Dai D, Cheng S, Dong X, Sun L, Guo X. Pan-cancer analysis of alternative splicing regulator heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs) family and their prognostic potential. J Cell Mol Med. 2020 Oct;24(19):11111-11119. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.15558. Epub 2020 Sep 11.
PMID: 32915499BACKGROUNDDreyfuss G, Matunis MJ, Pinol-Roma S, Burd CG. hnRNP proteins and the biogenesis of mRNA. Annu Rev Biochem. 1993;62:289-321. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.62.070193.001445. No abstract available.
PMID: 8352591BACKGROUNDCheca-Rojas A, Delgadillo-Silva LF, Velasco-Herrera MDC, Andrade-Dominguez A, Gil J, Santillan O, Lozano L, Toledo-Leyva A, Ramirez-Torres A, Talamas-Rohana P, Encarnacion-Guevara S. GSTM3 and GSTP1: novel players driving tumor progression in cervical cancer. Oncotarget. 2018 Apr 24;9(31):21696-21714. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.24796. eCollection 2018 Apr 24.
PMID: 29774096BACKGROUNDWilliam W, Ware A, Basaza-Ejiri AH, Obungoloch J. A pap-smear analysis tool (PAT) for detection of cervical cancer from pap-smear images. Biomed Eng Online. 2019 Feb 12;18(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12938-019-0634-5.
PMID: 30755214BACKGROUNDShin MB, Garcia PJ, Saldarriaga EM, Fiestas JL, Asbjornsdottir KH, Iribarren SJ, Barnabas RV, Gimbel S. Cost of community-based human papillomavirus self-sampling in Peru: A micro-costing study. Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Apr;8:100160. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100160. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
PMID: 35528707BACKGROUNDGiannella L, Di Giuseppe J, Delli Carpini G, Grelloni C, Fichera M, Sartini G, Caimmi S, Natalini L, Ciavattini A. HPV-Negative Adenocarcinomas of the Uterine Cervix: From Molecular Characterization to Clinical Implications. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Nov 30;23(23):15022. doi: 10.3390/ijms232315022.
PMID: 36499345BACKGROUNDJenkins D, Molijn A, Kazem S, Pirog EC, Alemany L, de Sanjose S, Dinjens W, Quint W. Molecular and pathological basis of HPV-negative cervical adenocarcinoma seen in a global study. Int J Cancer. 2020 Nov 1;147(9):2526-2536. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33124. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
PMID: 32474915BACKGROUNDLee JE, Chung Y, Rhee S, Kim TH. Untold story of human cervical cancers: HPV-negative cervical cancer. BMB Rep. 2022 Sep;55(9):429-438. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2022.55.9.042.
PMID: 35725012BACKGROUNDNajib FS, Hashemi M, Shiravani Z, Poordast T, Sharifi S, Askary E. Diagnostic Accuracy of Cervical Pap Smear and Colposcopy in Detecting Premalignant and Malignant Lesions of Cervix. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;11(3):453-458. doi: 10.1007/s13193-020-01118-2. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
PMID: 33013127BACKGROUNDMayrand MH, Duarte-Franco E, Rodrigues I, Walter SD, Hanley J, Ferenczy A, Ratnam S, Coutlee F, Franco EL; Canadian Cervical Cancer Screening Trial Study Group. Human papillomavirus DNA versus Papanicolaou screening tests for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 18;357(16):1579-88. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa071430.
PMID: 17942871BACKGROUNDKitchener HC, Castle PE, Cox JT. Chapter 7: Achievements and limitations of cervical cytology screening. Vaccine. 2006 Aug 31;24 Suppl 3:S3/63-70. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.05.113.
PMID: 16950019BACKGROUNDBravington A, Chen H, Dyson J, Jones L, Dalgliesh C, Bryan A, Patnick J, Macleod U. Challenges and opportunities for cervical screening in women over the age of 50 years: a qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 Nov 24;72(725):e873-e881. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2022.0036. Print 2022 Dec.
PMID: 36192359BACKGROUNDShin HY, Song SY, Jun JK, Kim KY, Kang P. Barriers and strategies for cervical cancer screening: What do female university students know and want? PLoS One. 2021 Oct 5;16(10):e0257529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0257529. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34610022BACKGROUNDPetersen Z, Jaca A, Ginindza TG, Maseko G, Takatshana S, Ndlovu P, Zondi N, Zungu N, Varghese C, Hunting G, Parham G, Simelela P, Moyo S. Barriers to uptake of cervical cancer screening services in low-and-middle-income countries: a systematic review. BMC Womens Health. 2022 Dec 2;22(1):486. doi: 10.1186/s12905-022-02043-y.
PMID: 36461001BACKGROUNDAkinlotan M, Bolin JN, Helduser J, Ojinnaka C, Lichorad A, McClellan D. Cervical Cancer Screening Barriers and Risk Factor Knowledge Among Uninsured Women. J Community Health. 2017 Aug;42(4):770-778. doi: 10.1007/s10900-017-0316-9.
PMID: 28155005BACKGROUNDZhang L, Mosquera I, Lucas E, Rol ML, Carvalho AL, Basu P; CanScreen5 collaborators. CanScreen5, a global repository for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening programs. Nat Med. 2023 May;29(5):1135-1145. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02315-6. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
PMID: 37106168BACKGROUNDMitra A, Tzafetas M, Lyons D, Fotopoulou C, Paraskevaidis E, Kyrgiou M. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: screening and management. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016 Aug 2;77(8):C118-23. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.8.C118. No abstract available.
PMID: 27487071BACKGROUNDAlimena S, Davis J, Fichorova RN, Feldman S. The vaginal microbiome: A complex milieu affecting risk of human papillomavirus persistence and cervical cancer. Curr Probl Cancer. 2022 Aug;46(4):100877. doi: 10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2022.100877. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
PMID: 35709613BACKGROUNDJohnson CA, James D, Marzan A, Armaos M. Cervical Cancer: An Overview of Pathophysiology and Management. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2019 Apr;35(2):166-174. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.02.003. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
PMID: 30878194BACKGROUNDRibeiro AA, Costa MC, Alves RR, Villa LL, Saddi VA, Carneiro MA, Zeferino LC, Rabelo-Santos SH. HPV infection and cervical neoplasia: associated risk factors. Infect Agent Cancer. 2015 May 26;10:16. doi: 10.1186/s13027-015-0011-3. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 26244052BACKGROUNDVesco KK, Whitlock EP, Eder M, Burda BU, Senger CA, Lutz K. Risk factors and other epidemiologic considerations for cervical cancer screening: a narrative review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):698-705, W216. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00377. Epub 2011 Oct 17.
PMID: 22006929BACKGROUNDInternational Collaboration of Epidemiological Studies of Cervical Cancer. Cervical carcinoma and sexual behavior: collaborative reanalysis of individual data on 15,461 women with cervical carcinoma and 29,164 women without cervical carcinoma from 21 epidemiological studies. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009 Apr;18(4):1060-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1186. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
PMID: 19336546BACKGROUNDPlummer M, Herrero R, Franceschi S, Meijer CJ, Snijders P, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Munoz N; IARC Multi-centre Cervical Cancer Study Group. Smoking and cervical cancer: pooled analysis of the IARC multi-centric case--control study. Cancer Causes Control. 2003 Nov;14(9):805-14. doi: 10.1023/b:caco.0000003811.98261.3e.
PMID: 14682438BACKGROUNDCollins S, Rollason TP, Young LS, Woodman CB. Cigarette smoking is an independent risk factor for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in young women: a longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer. 2010 Jan;46(2):405-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.09.015. Epub 2009 Oct 12.
PMID: 19819687BACKGROUNDTekalegn Y, Sahiledengle B, Woldeyohannes D, Atlaw D, Degno S, Desta F, Bekele K, Aseffa T, Gezahegn H, Kene C. High parity is associated with increased risk of cervical cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of case-control studies. Womens Health (Lond). 2022 Jan-Dec;18:17455065221075904. doi: 10.1177/17455065221075904.
PMID: 35114865BACKGROUNDBezabih M, Tessema F, Sengi H, Deribew A. Risk Factors Associated with Invasive Cervical Carcinoma among Women Attending Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia: A Case Control Study. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2015 Oct;25(4):345-52. doi: 10.4314/ejhs.v25i4.8.
PMID: 26949299BACKGROUNDMcGraw SL, Ferrante JM. Update on prevention and screening of cervical cancer. World J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 10;5(4):744-52. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v5.i4.744.
PMID: 25302174BACKGROUNDHwang LY, Ma Y, Benningfield SM, Clayton L, Hanson EN, Jay J, Jonte J, Godwin de Medina C, Moscicki AB. Factors that influence the rate of epithelial maturation in the cervix in healthy young women. J Adolesc Health. 2009 Feb;44(2):103-110. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.10.006.
PMID: 19167657BACKGROUNDRuiz AM, Ruiz JE, Gavilanes AV, Eriksson T, Lehtinen M, Perez G, Sings HL, James MK, Haupt RM; FUTURE I and II Study Group. Proximity of first sexual intercourse to menarche and risk of high-grade cervical disease. J Infect Dis. 2012 Dec 15;206(12):1887-96. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis612. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
PMID: 23066159BACKGROUNDMok, S. C., Wong, K. K., Lu, K. H., Munger, K. & Nagymanyoki, Z. Molecular basis of gynecologic diseases. in Essential Concepts in Molecular Pathology 409-424 (Elsevier, 2020). doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-813257-9.00023-1.
BACKGROUND
Related Links
- World Health Organization \& International Agency for Research on Cancer. Global Cancer Observatory
- World Health Organization. Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem
- Sellors JW \& Sankaranarayanan R. An introduction to Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN). in Colposcopy and treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: a beginners manual
- International Agency for Research on Cancer. CanScreen5. Cervical Cancer Screening Programme. Country Fact Sheet: Mexico
- Mexico's Ministry of Health. NOM-014-SSA2-1994. For Prevention, Detection, Diagnosis, Treatment, Control and Epidemiological Surveillance of Cervical Cancer
- World Health Organization. WHO Guideline for Screening and Treatment of Cervical Pre-Cancer Lesions for Cervical Cancer Prevention.
- Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) \& Mexican Government. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Prevention and Timely Detection of Cervical Cancer at the First-Level of Care
- William, W., Ware, A., Basaza-Ejiri, A. H. \& Obungoloch, J. Automated diagnosis and classification of cervical cancer from Pap-smear images. in 2019 IST-Africa Week Conference, IST-Africa 2019
- Reyes-Hernández, D. O. et al. Novel Serum Protein Biomarkers for Precancerous Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer. Glob J Health Sci 16, 44 (2024).
- Mexican Social Security Institute (IMSS) \& Mexican Government. Clinical Practice Guidelines. Treatment of Cervical Cancer at the Second and Third-Level of Care
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leopoldo E Gatica-Galina, MD in OB/GY & Gynecol Oncol
Clinica Reina Madre Metepec
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Given this is a screening study: I) Participant. All enrolled participants will be asymptomatic women. Group assignment will be defined after colposcopy or histopathology (when applicable). II) Care Provider. The gynecologist will not have a priori knowledge of the condition of the participant. During colposcopy only those participants with abnormal results will be biopsied. III) Investigator. None of the investigators performing the tests (cytology, HPV detection, molecular screening, or histopathology) will know each other's results.
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 3, 2025
First Posted
October 7, 2025
Study Start
February 27, 2026
Primary Completion
February 27, 2026
Study Completion
February 27, 2026
Last Updated
March 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
All de-identified individual participant data will be publicly available in the supplementary material associated with the scientific publication.