Identifying and Addressing Barriers to Retention in the Cervical Cancer Treatment Cascade Among Women With HIV in South Africa: Part 2
1 other identifier
interventional
80
2 countries
3
Brief Summary
The investigators will conduct the formative work that is necessary to develop a novel, multi-level intervention (inclusive of patient- and provider-level components), which will increase awareness of and modify the complex, intersecting factors that contribute to cervical cancer development among cisgender women with HIV (WWH). In Aim 1a, the investigators will explore the multi-level barriers and facilitators to follow-up appointment attendance among WWH who have had a recent high-risk abnormal Pap smear in the past six months, via qualitative interviews with WWH who have either attended at least one follow-up visit (n\<10) or have not yet attended a follow-up visit (n\<10). In Aim 1b, the investigators will explore provider awareness of the HIV-cervical cancer relationship and perspectives on barriers to retention in care via qualitative interviews (n\<8). For Aim 2, The study team will leverage the Aim 1 data, develop a patient-level intervention (1-2 sessions) and a provider toolkit, with the goal of increasing retention in care among WWH who are at heightened risk for cervical cancer. The study team will seek feedback on the manual and the toolkit from providers and from a community advisory board. In Aim 3a, the investigators will test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention in a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) (n\<60). The study team will also assess (1) changes in self-efficacy to attend cervical cancer-related healthcare appointments pre-post intervention, (2) the proportion of women who attend a follow-up appointment, and, of those participants, (3) the proportion of women who complete the next phase of treatment. In Aim 3b, the investigators will explore the feasibility of intervention implementation in the clinic and acceptability of the provider-level intervention components in qualitative interviews with providers, clinic staff, the interventionalists, and other key stakeholders (n\<10).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 30, 2023
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 26, 2023
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 15, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 31, 2026
September 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
8 months
November 30, 2023
September 15, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Feasibility of the intervention
Feasibility will be demonstrated if all three are met by participants: (1) 50% of participants who are approached choose to enroll; (2) 70% of participants complete the intervention; and (3) 60% complete the 3-month follow-up. Feasibility of the implementation of the intervention will be explored in interviews with providers, clinic staff, interventionalists, and other relevant stakeholders.
About 1-2 months after the start of intervention and at about 4 months after the start of the intervention
Acceptability of the intervention
Acceptability will be measured using the seven component constructs of the acceptability of health care interventions framework using a five-point Likert style scale. The seven components include affective attitude (i.e., how an individual feels about the intervention), burden, ethicality (i.e., the extent to which the intervention aligns with one's value system), intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. Acceptability will be demonstrated if, on average, at least 75% of the participants rate five or more of the items on the eight-item Acceptability of Healthcare Interventions Questionnaire with a 4 or a 5 on the Likert-style scale. Acceptability of the intervention will also be explored in interviews with providers, clinic staff, interventionalists, and other relevant stakeholders.
About 1-2 months after the start of intervention and at about 4 months after the start of the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Self-efficacy to attend cervical cancer-related health care appointment
Start of the intervention and about 1-2 months after the start of intervention
Follow-up appointment attendance
About 4 months after the start of the intervention
Study Arms (2)
Participant intervention
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention group will likely consist of one to two sessions, conducted in-person, coupled with text- or phone-based client navigation.The intervention group will complete three major assessments: baseline (T1), at the conclusion of the intervention (T2), and a three-month follow-up (T3). Until the follow-up assessment, the interventionist will send participants up to 6 SMS messages (one-way) per month. The content of these messages will be developed collaboratively between the participant and the interventionist during the second session; messages could include reminders about follow-ups and/or prompts to use new skills and resources for navigating specific barriers.
Treatment as usual
NO INTERVENTIONThe treatment as usual (TAU) group will receive treatment as usual, including being notified of their abnormal Pap results via SMS and instructed to set up a follow-up appointment, as is typical in routine care. The TAU group will complete the T1 assessment and will complete T2 assessment two-months post-baseline.
Interventions
Aim 1 data will inform this intervention, however the participant intervention will likely be one or two sessions, conducted in-person, coupled with text- or phone-based client navigation with women who received abnormal high-risk Pap smear results. We anticipate that the intervention may integrate (1) information to improve awareness of cervical cancer susceptibility and treatment, (2) motivational interviewing to assess pros and cons of attending a follow-up appointment and completing treatment; (3) brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) skills to reduce individual-level barriers, (4) problem-solving to increase social support, and (5) patient navigation tools to mitigate clinic-level challenges.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Having a cervix
- Aged 18+
- Living with HIV
- Recent high-risk abnormal Pap results within the last month (if needed, we may increase the range by up to 6 months to ensure that we meet our targets).
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18 years old
- HIV-negative
- No cervix/history of hysterectomy
- Recent normal or low-risk abnormal Pap results
- Unable to provide informed consent or assent in English or isiZulu and/or have a significant psychiatric illness (e.g., active psychotic disorder or untreated bipolar disorder) that could interfere with participation will be excluded. Potential participants will also be asked if they have any health conditions that make it difficult for them to travel to the clinic.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Boston University Charles River Campuslead
- University of Witwatersrand, South Africacollaborator
- Massachusetts General Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States
Boston University
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
MatCH Research Unit (MRU), a Division of the Wits Health Consortium, University of Witwatersrand
Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4000, South Africa
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 30, 2023
First Posted
December 26, 2023
Study Start
October 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share