NCT06182241

Brief Summary

The investigators will conduct the formative work that is necessary to develop a novel, multi-level intervention (inclusive of patient- and provider-level components), which will increase awareness of and modify the complex, intersecting factors that contribute to cervical cancer development among cisgender women with HIV (WWH). In Aim 1a, the investigators will explore the multi-level barriers and facilitators to follow-up appointment attendance among WWH who have had a recent high-risk abnormal Pap smear in the past six months, via qualitative interviews with WWH who have either attended at least one follow-up visit (n\<10) or have not yet attended a follow-up visit (n\<10). In Aim 1b, the investigators will explore provider awareness of the HIV-cervical cancer relationship and perspectives on barriers to retention in care via qualitative interviews (n\<8). For Aim 2, The study team will leverage the Aim 1 data, develop a patient-level intervention (1-2 sessions) and a provider toolkit, with the goal of increasing retention in care among WWH who are at heightened risk for cervical cancer. The study team will seek feedback on the manual and the toolkit from providers and from a community advisory board. In Aim 3a, the investigators will test the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention in a pilot randomized control trial (RCT) (n\<60). The study team will also assess (1) changes in self-efficacy to attend cervical cancer-related healthcare appointments pre-post intervention, (2) the proportion of women who attend a follow-up appointment, and, of those participants, (3) the proportion of women who complete the next phase of treatment. In Aim 3b, the investigators will explore the feasibility of intervention implementation in the clinic and acceptability of the provider-level intervention components in qualitative interviews with providers, clinic staff, the interventionalists, and other key stakeholders (n\<10).

Trial Health

67
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
80

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
1mo left

Started Oct 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress90%
Oct 2025May 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

November 30, 2023

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 26, 2023

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 15, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 31, 2026

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 31, 2026

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

8 months

First QC Date

November 30, 2023

Last Update Submit

September 15, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Feasibility of the intervention

    Feasibility will be demonstrated if all three are met by participants: (1) 50% of participants who are approached choose to enroll; (2) 70% of participants complete the intervention; and (3) 60% complete the 3-month follow-up. Feasibility of the implementation of the intervention will be explored in interviews with providers, clinic staff, interventionalists, and other relevant stakeholders.

    About 1-2 months after the start of intervention and at about 4 months after the start of the intervention

  • Acceptability of the intervention

    Acceptability will be measured using the seven component constructs of the acceptability of health care interventions framework using a five-point Likert style scale. The seven components include affective attitude (i.e., how an individual feels about the intervention), burden, ethicality (i.e., the extent to which the intervention aligns with one's value system), intervention coherence, opportunity costs, perceived effectiveness, and self-efficacy. Acceptability will be demonstrated if, on average, at least 75% of the participants rate five or more of the items on the eight-item Acceptability of Healthcare Interventions Questionnaire with a 4 or a 5 on the Likert-style scale. Acceptability of the intervention will also be explored in interviews with providers, clinic staff, interventionalists, and other relevant stakeholders.

    About 1-2 months after the start of intervention and at about 4 months after the start of the intervention

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Self-efficacy to attend cervical cancer-related health care appointment

    Start of the intervention and about 1-2 months after the start of intervention

  • Follow-up appointment attendance

    About 4 months after the start of the intervention

Study Arms (2)

Participant intervention

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention group will likely consist of one to two sessions, conducted in-person, coupled with text- or phone-based client navigation.The intervention group will complete three major assessments: baseline (T1), at the conclusion of the intervention (T2), and a three-month follow-up (T3). Until the follow-up assessment, the interventionist will send participants up to 6 SMS messages (one-way) per month. The content of these messages will be developed collaboratively between the participant and the interventionist during the second session; messages could include reminders about follow-ups and/or prompts to use new skills and resources for navigating specific barriers.

Behavioral: Retention in cervical cancer care intervention

Treatment as usual

NO INTERVENTION

The treatment as usual (TAU) group will receive treatment as usual, including being notified of their abnormal Pap results via SMS and instructed to set up a follow-up appointment, as is typical in routine care. The TAU group will complete the T1 assessment and will complete T2 assessment two-months post-baseline.

Interventions

Aim 1 data will inform this intervention, however the participant intervention will likely be one or two sessions, conducted in-person, coupled with text- or phone-based client navigation with women who received abnormal high-risk Pap smear results. We anticipate that the intervention may integrate (1) information to improve awareness of cervical cancer susceptibility and treatment, (2) motivational interviewing to assess pros and cons of attending a follow-up appointment and completing treatment; (3) brief cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) skills to reduce individual-level barriers, (4) problem-solving to increase social support, and (5) patient navigation tools to mitigate clinic-level challenges.

Participant intervention

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Having a cervix
  • Aged 18+
  • Living with HIV
  • Recent high-risk abnormal Pap results within the last month (if needed, we may increase the range by up to 6 months to ensure that we meet our targets).

You may not qualify if:

  • Younger than 18 years old
  • HIV-negative
  • No cervix/history of hysterectomy
  • Recent normal or low-risk abnormal Pap results
  • Unable to provide informed consent or assent in English or isiZulu and/or have a significant psychiatric illness (e.g., active psychotic disorder or untreated bipolar disorder) that could interfere with participation will be excluded. Potential participants will also be asked if they have any health conditions that make it difficult for them to travel to the clinic.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Massachusetts General Hospital

Boston, Massachusetts, 02114, United States

Location

Boston University

Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States

Location

MatCH Research Unit (MRU), a Division of the Wits Health Consortium, University of Witwatersrand

Durban, KwaZulu-Natal, 4000, South Africa

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Uterine Cervical NeoplasmsAcquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Uterine NeoplasmsGenital Neoplasms, FemaleUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsUterine Cervical DiseasesUterine DiseasesGenital Diseases, FemaleFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesGenital DiseasesHIV InfectionsBlood-Borne InfectionsCommunicable DiseasesInfectionsSexually Transmitted Diseases, ViralSexually Transmitted DiseasesLentivirus InfectionsRetroviridae InfectionsRNA Virus InfectionsVirus DiseasesSlow Virus DiseasesImmunologic Deficiency SyndromesImmune System Diseases

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assistant Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2023

First Posted

December 26, 2023

Study Start

October 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 31, 2026

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations