NCT07204587

Brief Summary

This multicenter, stratified, partially randomized clinical trial aims to compare autologous semitendinosus tendon graft and meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) in young adults with post-meniscectomy syndrome. The meniscus plays a critical role in load distribution, shock absorption, and joint stability. After meniscectomy, insufficient meniscal tissue often leads to persistent pain, swelling, and functional decline, increasing the risk of early osteoarthritis. Two reconstructive strategies are clinically available: MAT provides immediate biomechanical function but requires donor matching and carries higher costs, while autologous tendon graft offers stable supply and no immunologic risk but lacks long-term clinical validation. In this study, 40 patients aged 18-45 years will be enrolled. Participants will be allocated into four groups (randomized MAT, randomized autograft, patient-preference MAT, patient-preference autograft). All procedures will use a two-tunnel fixation technique with additional internal brace support. The primary endpoint is the improvement in KOOS (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) at 24 months postoperatively. Secondary endpoints include MRI-based assessment of graft morphology and extrusion, reoperation rate, complications, patient satisfaction, and return-to-sport time. This trial will provide critical evidence regarding the comparative effectiveness and feasibility of tendon autograft versus meniscal allograft in real-world clinical settings, potentially informing surgical decision-making and future treatment guidelines for post-meniscectomy syndrome.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
40

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
42mo left

Started Oct 2025

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress15%
Oct 2025Sep 2029

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 24, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2025

Completed
3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 30, 2028

Expected
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2029

Last Updated

October 2, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 years

First QC Date

September 24, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 24, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

meniscal allograftautologous tendon graftPost-meniscectomy syndromeMeniscus deficiency

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score

    The KOOS questionnaire evaluates knee-related symptoms, pain, activities of daily living, sports/recreation function, and knee-related quality of life. The primary endpoint is the change in KOOS total score from baseline to 24 months postoperatively.

    Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery (primary analysis at 24 months)

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • MRI-Based Graft Evaluation

    12 and 24 months postoperatively

  • IKDC (International Knee Documentation Committee) Subjective Knee Evaluation

    Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

  • Tegner Activity Scale

    Baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after surgery

  • Reoperation Rate

    Up to 24 months postoperatively

  • Complications

    Within 24 months after surgery

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (4)

A1 Autologous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft (Randomized)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo meniscal reconstruction using autologous semitendinosus tendon grafts (diameter ≥ 6 mm). Standard two-tunnel fixation technique will be applied, with Fibertape internal brace augmentation. ACL reconstruction may be performed simultaneously if indicated.

Procedure: Autologous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft

A2 Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (Randomized)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients randomized to this arm will receive size-matched fresh-frozen meniscal allografts. Fixation will be performed using the standard two-tunnel technique.

Procedure: Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT)

Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (Patient Preference)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients who decline randomization but choose allograft transplantation will undergo the same surgical procedure as Arm A2, with fresh-frozen meniscal allografts.

Procedure: Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (MAT)

Autologous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft (Patient Preference)

EXPERIMENTAL

Patients who decline randomization but choose autologous tendon grafting will undergo the same procedure as Arm A1, using semitendinosus tendon grafts with Fibertape internal brace augmentation.

Procedure: Autologous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft

Interventions

Meniscal reconstruction will be performed using autologous semitendinosus tendon harvested from the ipsilateral leg. The graft diameter must be at least 6 mm. A two-tunnel fixation technique will be employed, securing the graft to the tibial plateau at the anatomic meniscal root sites. The graft will be shaped and positioned to mimic the native meniscal contour. Fibertape internal brace augmentation will be added to enhance fixation strength and graft stability. If concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is indicated, the graft choice and ACL technique will be determined by the surgeon, without restriction. Postoperative rehabilitation will follow a standardized protocol across all centers.

A1 Autologous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft (Randomized)Autologous Semitendinosus Tendon Graft (Patient Preference)

Meniscal allograft transplantation will use size-matched, fresh-frozen allograft menisci prepared according to institutional tissue bank standards. Grafts will be fixed using a two-tunnel bone plug technique, restoring the anatomic root insertions. The allograft will be centrally positioned within the tibiofemoral compartment, and centralization sutures may be added at the discretion of the operating surgeon. All procedures will be standardized across participating centers, and postoperative rehabilitation protocols will be identical to those used in the autologous graft arm.

A2 Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (Randomized)Meniscal Allograft Transplantation (Patient Preference)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 to 45 years
  • History of partial meniscectomy \> 6 months prior to enrollment
  • Symptomatic post-meniscectomy syndrome (knee pain, swelling, or functional decline)
  • MRI showing cartilage status ≤ Outerbridge grade 2
  • Knee joint stability (or stabilized during the index surgery)
  • Body mass index (BMI) \< 30
  • Willingness to provide written informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Tibial slope \> 16°
  • Radiographic or arthroscopic evidence of advanced cartilage degeneration (Outerbridge \> 2 or ICRS ≥ 3)
  • Presence of inflammatory arthritis or systemic inflammatory joint disease
  • History of cartilage repair surgery
  • Malalignment \> 5° not corrected
  • Untreated ligamentous instability
  • Any other condition judged by the investigator to compromise study participation or outcomes

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Chang Gung memorial hospital, Taoyuan, taoyuan 333

Taoyuan, Taoyuan, 33305, Taiwan

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Seitz AM, Leiprecht J, Schwer J, Ignatius A, Reichel H, Kappe T. Autologous semitendinosus meniscus graft significantly improves knee joint kinematics and the tibiofemoral contact after complete lateral meniscectomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Jul;31(7):2956-2965. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07300-z. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

    PMID: 36604322BACKGROUND
  • Ronnblad E, Rotzius P, Eriksson K. Autologous semitendinosus tendon graft could function as a meniscal transplant. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 May;30(5):1520-1526. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06606-8. Epub 2021 Jun 8.

    PMID: 34100999BACKGROUND

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Postoperative MRI and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) will be evaluated by independent assessors blinded to treatment allocation. Participants, surgeons, and investigators will be aware of the intervention due to the surgical nature of the study.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: This study uses a stratified, partially randomized parallel assignment model. Eligible patients are allocated into four groups: randomized autologous semitendinosus tendon graft, randomized meniscal allograft transplantation, patient-preference autologous tendon graft, and patient-preference meniscal allograft transplantation. Even in the randomized groups, participants retain the option to switch to their preferred treatment after allocation, ensuring both methodological rigor and ethical feasibility. This design allows assessment of comparative outcomes under randomized conditions as well as in real-world preference-based clinical practice.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2025

First Posted

October 2, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 30, 2029

Last Updated

October 2, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

1. Protection of participant privacy and confidentiality is paramount in this study involving sensitive medical data and procedures. Sharing identifiable IPD could breach the trust and privacy of these patients undergoing knee surgeries. 2. The informed consent process likely did not explicitly state or obtain approval from participants to share their individual-level data, including medical images, functional assessments, and clinical outcomes, with third parties outside the research team.

Locations