This is a Study to Verify if Marrow Venting Procedure Can Improve Meniscal Suture Healing
Biological Augmentation Of Meniscal Repair With Marrow Venting: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Meniscal suture represents the current surgical practice, and marrow venting is a low risk procedure. Bone venting may be able to improve the outcome of meniscal repair, allowing the patient a better recovery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 22, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 29, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2030
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2030
August 6, 2025
August 1, 2025
8.8 years
July 22, 2021
August 5, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score
evaluated subjective IKDC score 2-years after intervention in two groups
2 years
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Objective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC)
(pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)
Lysholm score (pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)
(pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)
Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score - KOOS
(pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)
Pain 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
(pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)
Function 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
(pre-operative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years)
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Marrow venting arm
EXPERIMENTALMeniscal suture associated with marrow venting procedure
Control arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORMeniscal suture alone, without marrow venting procedure
Interventions
The meniscus is trimmed with an arthroscopic punch followed by an electric shaver to expose the margins of the tear and remove damaged tissue. Vertical sutures are made using TRUESPANâ„¢ Meniscal Repair System (DePuy Synthes) to approximate both the femoral and tibial surfaces of the torn meniscus.
After meniscal repair, a bone marrow venting procedure will be performed: a 45° micro-fracture awl is repeatedly penetrated through the bone of the intercondylar notch at the PCL origin until marrow elements are seen to enter the joint.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Arthroscopic confirmed suturable meniscal tears,
- Monolateral meniscal tears,
- years,
- BMI\>18,5 and \<35 kg/m2,
- Ability to give informed consent by signature.
You may not qualify if:
- Bilateral meniscal tears requiring treatment,
- Associated ligament lesions requiring treatment,
- Associated cartilage lesions (Outerbridge \> 2),
- Knee axis deformities requiring correction
- Generalized ligamentous laxity,
- Radiographic knee ostheoarthritis,
- Other reasons for knee pain,
- Pregnant or lactating women,
- Serious systemic diseases such as cardiac, hepatic or renal failure, rheumatic diseases, non-compensated diabetic, psychological illnesses, central or peripheral neurological diseases, and autoimmune diseases,
- Enrolled in another ongoing clinical trial.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale
Lugano, 6900, Switzerland
Clinica Ars Medica
Lugano, Switzerland
Related Publications (14)
Ahn JH, Kwon OJ, Nam TS. Arthroscopic repair of horizontal meniscal cleavage tears with marrow-stimulating technique. Arthroscopy. 2015 Jan;31(1):92-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.07.029. Epub 2014 Sep 18.
PMID: 25242513BACKGROUNDBriggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88(4):698-705. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.E.00339.
PMID: 16595458BACKGROUNDBryant D, Dill J, Litchfield R, Amendola A, Giffin R, Fowler P, Kirkley A. Effectiveness of bioabsorbable arrows compared with inside-out suturing for vertical, reparable meniscal lesions: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med. 2007 Jun;35(6):889-96. doi: 10.1177/0363546506298582. Epub 2007 Mar 2.
PMID: 17337726BACKGROUNDCharles HC, Kraus VB, Ainslie M, Hellio Le Graverand-Gastineau MP. Optimization of the fixed-flexion knee radiograph. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Nov;15(11):1221-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.05.012. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
PMID: 17977754BACKGROUNDCrawford K, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2007 Aug;23(8):839-44. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.02.005.
PMID: 17681205BACKGROUNDde Girolamo L, Galliera E, Volpi P, Denti M, Dogliotti G, Quaglia A, Cabitza P, Corsi Romanelli MM, Randelli P. Why menisci show higher healing rate when repaired during ACL reconstruction? Growth factors release can be the explanation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2015 Jan;23(1):90-6. doi: 10.1007/s00167-013-2712-8. Epub 2013 Oct 22.
PMID: 24146050BACKGROUNDDean CS, Chahla J, Matheny LM, Mitchell JJ, LaPrade RF. Outcomes After Biologically Augmented Isolated Meniscal Repair With Marrow Venting Are Comparable With Those After Meniscal Repair With Concomitant Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Am J Sports Med. 2017 May;45(6):1341-1348. doi: 10.1177/0363546516686968. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
PMID: 28298056BACKGROUNDDing C, Martel-Pelletier J, Pelletier JP, Abram F, Raynauld JP, Cicuttini F, Jones G. Meniscal tear as an osteoarthritis risk factor in a largely non-osteoarthritic cohort: a cross-sectional study. J Rheumatol. 2007 Apr;34(4):776-84. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
PMID: 17361984BACKGROUNDDriscoll MD, Robin BN, Horie M, Hubert ZT, Sampson HW, Jupiter DC, Tharakan B, Reeve RE. Marrow stimulation improves meniscal healing at early endpoints in a rabbit meniscal injury model. Arthroscopy. 2013 Jan;29(1):113-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.06.023. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
PMID: 23200846BACKGROUNDEnglund M, Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Aliabadi P, Yang M, Lewis CE, Torner J, Nevitt MC, Sack B, Felson DT. Meniscal tear in knees without surgery and the development of radiographic osteoarthritis among middle-aged and elderly persons: The Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. Arthritis Rheum. 2009 Mar;60(3):831-9. doi: 10.1002/art.24383.
PMID: 19248082BACKGROUNDEnglund M, Roemer FW, Hayashi D, Crema MD, Guermazi A. Meniscus pathology, osteoarthritis and the treatment controversy. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012 May 22;8(7):412-9. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2012.69.
PMID: 22614907BACKGROUNDFreedman KB, Nho SJ, Cole BJ. Marrow stimulating technique to augment meniscus repair. Arthroscopy. 2003 Sep;19(7):794-8. doi: 10.1016/s0749-8063(03)00695-9.
PMID: 12966391BACKGROUNDHowarth WR, Brochard K, Campbell SE, Grogan BF. Effect of Microfracture on Meniscal Tear Healing in a Goat (Capra hircus) Model. Orthopedics. 2016 Mar-Apr;39(2):105-10. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160119-04. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
PMID: 26811956BACKGROUNDKaminski R, Kulinski K, Kozar-Kaminska K, Wasko MK, Langner M, Pomianowski S. Repair Augmentation of Unstable, Complete Vertical Meniscal Tears With Bone Marrow Venting Procedure: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group, Placebo-Controlled Study. Arthroscopy. 2019 May;35(5):1500-1508.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2018.11.056. Epub 2019 Mar 20.
PMID: 30902532BACKGROUND
Related Links
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Candrian, MD
Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 22, 2021
First Posted
September 22, 2021
Study Start
December 29, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2030
Last Updated
August 6, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share