NCT07204223

Brief Summary

During surgery, right after anesthesia is given, the first step to help the patient breathe is to provide breathing support with a mask. This step is very important because if there is a problem with mask ventilation, the anesthesia team must quickly use other methods to help the patient breathe. For some people, mask ventilation can be more difficult. Factors such as older age, having a beard, missing teeth, being overweight, sleep apnea, or certain facial shapes can make this process harder. To make mask ventilation easier, special devices placed in the mouth are used. The most common one is called the Guedel airway. In recent years, a new device called the Tulip airway has also been introduced. The shape and features of the Tulip airway are designed to make breathing support easier. In this study, we will compare the Tulip airway and the Guedel airway in patients who are expected to have more difficult mask ventilation. Our goal is to find out which device makes it easier and safer to help patients breathe.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 11, 2025

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2025

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 2, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 11, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 16, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

guedel airwayairway managementdifficult bag mask ventilationtulip airway

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Expiratory Tidal Volume

    Patients in Group G will have a Guedel airway placed in a size appropriate for their weight, and the practitioner will hold the mask with both hands. Patients in Group T will have a Tulip airway placed in a size appropriate for their weight. In both groups, to prevent variability on the part of the practitioner, patients will be ventilated in pressure-controlled mode at 15 (centimeters of water) cmH₂O pressure, respiratory rate 10 breaths/min, an I:E ratio of 1:3, and an oxygen flow rate of 10 L/min without Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP). For both groups, successful mask ventilation will be defined as a tidal volume (TV) of at least 250 ml.

    Minute 5

Study Arms (2)

Guedel Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Guedel airway will be the first device during mask ventilation

Device: Guedel Airway

Tulip Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Tulip airway wil be the initial device for mask ventilation

Device: Tulip Airway

Interventions

In this study, patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia who meet the criteria for anticipated difficult mask ventilation will be included. Randomization will be performed to determine which device will be used first. If the Tulip airway is selected as the first device in the randomization process, mask ventilation will be initiated with the Tulip airway.

Tulip Group

In this study, patients scheduled for surgery under general anesthesia who meet the criteria for anticipated difficult mask ventilation will be included. Randomization will be performed to determine which device will be used first. If the Guedel airway is selected as the first device in the randomization process, mask ventilation will be initiated with the Guedel airway.

Guedel Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged between 18 and 75 years
  • Patients scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia
  • Patients with at least two risk factors for difficult mask ventilation, including:
  • Age over 55 years
  • Presence of beard
  • Edentulism (missing teeth)
  • Obesity (Body Mass Index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m²)
  • History of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) or snoring
  • Neck circumference \> 43 cm
  • Retrognathia (small jaw structure)
  • Patients classified as American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) physical status 1, 2, or 3
  • Patients who provide informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Patients with a history of airway surgery (e.g., tracheostomy, maxillofacial surgery)
  • Patients with severe cardiopulmonary diseases (e.g., advanced Chronic obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), pulmonary hypertension, severe heart failure)
  • Patients with craniofacial anomalies or significant anatomical airway deformities
  • Patients requiring emergency surgery
  • Patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and high risk of aspiration
  • Patients with active upper respiratory tract infection
  • Patients with a history of difficult intubation

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Kocaeli City Hospital

İzmit, Kocaeli, 41060, Turkey (Türkiye)

RECRUITING

Related Publications (6)

  • Shaikh A, Robinson PN, Hasan M. The Tulip GT(R) airway versus the facemask and Guedel airway: a randomised, controlled, cross-over study by Basic Life Support-trained airway providers in anaesthetised patients. Anaesthesia. 2016 Mar;71(3):315-9. doi: 10.1111/anae.13328. Epub 2015 Dec 19.

    PMID: 26684684BACKGROUND
  • Imashuku Y, Kitagawa H, Mizuno T. Usefulness of Tulip Airway in Edentulous Elderly Patients. Anesth Prog. 2022 Sep 1;69(3):9-12. doi: 10.2344/anpr-69-01-01.

    PMID: 36223186BACKGROUND
  • Koga K, Sata T, Kaku M, Takamoto K, Shigematsu A. Comparison of no airway device, the Guedel-type airway and the Cuffed Oropharyngeal Airway with mask ventilation during manual in-line stabilization. J Clin Anesth. 2001 Feb;13(1):6-10. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00228-2.

    PMID: 11259887BACKGROUND
  • Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Blitt CD, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, Hagberg CA, Caplan RA, Benumof JL, Berry FA, Blitt CD, Bode RH, Cheney FW, Connis RT, Guidry OF, Nickinovich DG, Ovassapian A; American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2013 Feb;118(2):251-70. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2. No abstract available.

    PMID: 23364566BACKGROUND
  • Bradley P, Chapman G, Crooke B, Greenland K. Airway Assessment.

    BACKGROUND
  • Bucher JT, Vashisht R, Cooper JS. Bag-Valve-Mask Ventilation. 2025 May 3. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025 Jan-. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK441924/

    PMID: 28722953BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Ayşe Z Turan Cıvraz, Assoc. Prof.

    Kocaeli City Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ayşe Z Turan Cıvraz, Assoc. Prof.

CONTACT

Bedirhan Günel, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER GOV
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Assoc.Prof.

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2025

First Posted

October 2, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion

December 31, 2025

Study Completion

December 31, 2025

Last Updated

November 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) underlying the findings of this study will be available upon reasonable request from qualified researchers, after de-identification, beginning 6 months following publication and ending 5 years later. Data will be shared for academic purposes with appropriate ethical approval and a signed data access agreement."

Locations