NCT07202195

Brief Summary

This study is being carried out at Multiple Sclerosis (MS) centers to evaluate whether a full-body stimulation suit at home can help people with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS) reduce symptoms like spasticity (muscle stiffness) and ataxia (poor coordination), and improve daily functioning. Can pwMS who experience spasticity or ataxia benefit from using a stimulation suit for 6 weeks? Researchers will compare two groups: an intervention group (who will use the suit) and a control group (who will not use the suit). Participants in the intervention group will:

  • Wear the suit for 6 weeks in total every day or every other day (1 week during their MS center admission and 5 weeks at home).
  • Receive their usual care in addition to wearing the suit.
  • Undergo clinical tests at the MS center after 1 week and 6 weeks of stimulation. Participants in the control group will:
  • Receive their usual care.
  • Undergo clincial tests at the same time points as the other group.

Trial Health

80
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
70

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable multiple-sclerosis

Timeline
16mo left

Started Mar 2026

Geographic Reach
2 countries

2 active sites

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress12%
Mar 2026Sep 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 25, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 1, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2026

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

September 1, 2027

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 6, 2026

Status Verified

January 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

August 25, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 4, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

ataxiaspasticitymultiple sclerosisMSneuromodulation suitstimulation suitexopluse molli suithome-based rehabilitationsymptom management

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • NHPT+SSST score

    The primary outcome will be a combined measure of upper and lower extremity motor function, consisting of the Nine Hole Peg Test and the Six Spot step test (labelled NHPT+SSST score). Values are expressed in seconds. A higher score, indicates a worse outcome.

    After one and six weeks of stimulation for the intervention group. The control group will be assessed at the same time points.

Secondary Outcomes (14)

  • Six spot step test (SSST)

    SSST assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  • Nine Hole Peg Test (NHPT)

    NHPT assessment will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  • Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)

    MAS assessment will take place during screening, as they are used to determine eligibility and after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  • Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA)

    SARA assessment will take place during screening, as they are used to determine eligibility and after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  • Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    NRS assessments will take place after weeks 1 and 6 of stimulation.

  • +9 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (10)

  • Multiple Sclerosis (MS) type

    Will be collected (at baseline) when a partcipant is found eligible

  • age

    Will be collected at baseline when a partcipant is found eligible

  • sex

    Will be collected at baseline when a partcipant is found eligible

  • +7 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

stimulation suit group

EXPERIMENTAL

This group will wear a full-body stimulation suit every day or every other day for six weeks, in addition to their usual care.

Device: electro-stimulation suitOther: Usual Care

usual care

OTHER

This group will be a comparator and have no added intervention expect for their usual care.

Other: Usual Care

Interventions

In EXOPULSE Mollii Suit is a multi-channel full-body suit with a low energy electrical stimulation - 20 Volt and 20 Hz. It generates 2 milliamp pulses (into 0-10,000 Ohms) with the following parameters: * Pulse width: variable between 25 and 170 μs. * Length of period: 50 ms. * Maximum amplitude: 20 V. It is composed of a control unit, a jacket and pants, with 58 embed-ded electrodes, in direct contact with the skin, and pre-positioned to stimulate 40 key muscle groups. The suit comes in different sizes. A trained medical staff pre-programs which nerves/muscles to be stimulated based on a clinical assessment of the user and the outcome is evaluated through standardized methods. The stimulation program is thus specific to each user.

Also known as: neuromodulation suit, stimulation suit, EXOPULSE MOLLII suit
stimulation suit group

The rehabilitation therapy that is being offered at the National MS Center Melsbroek, but somewhat reduced/adjusted to make time for initiation and follow-up of using the neuromodulation suit and potentially also during the weeks at home (i.e., rehabilitation being offered by municipalities).

Also known as: standard care
stimulation suit groupusual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The patient must have the cognitive abilities to understand instructions and to be able to complete the questionnaires adequately
  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis.

You may not qualify if:

  • Implanted devices (like pacemaker, Baclofen pump, neurostimulator, defibrillator, shunts, ECG equipment, electronic life support, high frequency operation equipment )
  • Change in disease modifying treatment within the last 3 months
  • Use of Botuline Toxine A within the last 3months
  • Recent relapse within the last 3 months
  • Acute musculoskeletal problems that hinder the test performance,
  • Pregnancy
  • Sizes bigger than 3XL (triple eXtra Large)
  • Skin eruptions and/or skin areas in the stimulation zone that are swollen, infected or inflamed.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Nationaal MS Center Melsbroek

Steenokkerzeel, 1820, Belgium

RECRUITING

The Danish MS Hospitals

Ry, 8680, Denmark

RECRUITING

Related Publications (26)

  • Weller LJR, Sherwood SM, Ng SH, Vellaichamy M, Noordin AA, Tan LY, Mahadev A, Yeo TH, Ng ZM. Can External Neuromodulation Garments Improve Gait and Function in Children With Cerebral Palsy? A Prospective Single-Arm Study. Health Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 23;8(3):e70566. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70566. eCollection 2025 Mar.

    PMID: 40129510BACKGROUND
  • Skjerbaek AG, Dalgas U, Stenager E, Boesen F, Hvid LG. The six spot step test is superior in detecting walking capacity impairments compared to short- and long-distance walk tests in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2023 Dec 12;9(4):20552173231218127. doi: 10.1177/20552173231218127. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.

    PMID: 38105806BACKGROUND
  • Riemenschneider M, Trenel P, Norgaard M, Boesen F. Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:104012. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012. Epub 2022 Jul 2.

    PMID: 35820358BACKGROUND
  • Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001 Jul;33(5):337-43. doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087.

    PMID: 11491192BACKGROUND
  • Perpetuini D, Russo EF, Cardone D, Palmieri R, De Giacomo A, Pellegrino R, Merla A, Calabro RS, Filoni S. Use and Effectiveness of Electrosuit in Neurological Disorders: A Systematic Review with Clinical Implications. Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jun 2;10(6):680. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10060680.

    PMID: 37370612BACKGROUND
  • Palmcrantz S, Pennati GV, Bergling H, Borg J. Feasibility and potential effects of using the electro-dress Mollii on spasticity and functioning in chronic stroke. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020 Aug 10;17(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12984-020-00740-z.

    PMID: 32778118BACKGROUND
  • Moller AB, Bibby BM, Skjerbaek AG, Jensen E, Sorensen H, Stenager E, Dalgas U. Validity and variability of the 5-repetition sit-to-stand test in patients with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(26):2251-8. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.683479. Epub 2012 May 22.

    PMID: 22612360BACKGROUND
  • Miller L, Mattison P, Paul L, Wood L. The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on spasticity in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007 May;13(4):527-33. doi: 10.1177/1352458506071509. Epub 2007 Jan 29.

    PMID: 17463075BACKGROUND
  • Milinis K, Tennant A, Young CA; TONiC study group. Spasticity in multiple sclerosis: Associations with impairments and overall quality of life. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2016 Jan;5:34-9. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Oct 22.

    PMID: 26856941BACKGROUND
  • McGinley MP, Goldschmidt CH, Rae-Grant AD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review. JAMA. 2021 Feb 23;325(8):765-779. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.26858.

    PMID: 33620411BACKGROUND
  • Mai AS, Yong JH, Lim OZH, Tan EK. Non-invasive electrical stimulation in patients with neurodegenerative ataxia and spasticity: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Neurol. 2022 Sep;29(9):2842-2850. doi: 10.1111/ene.15438. Epub 2022 Jun 27.

    PMID: 35666142BACKGROUND
  • Learmonth YC, Motl RW, Sandroff BM, Pula JH, Cadavid D. Validation of patient determined disease steps (PDDS) scale scores in persons with multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2013 Apr 25;13:37. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-37.

    PMID: 23617555BACKGROUND
  • Jones AA, Purohit R, Bhatt T, Motl RW. Maintaining Mobility and Balance in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review Examining Potential Impact of Symptomatic Pharmacotherapy. CNS Drugs. 2025 Apr;39(4):361-382. doi: 10.1007/s40263-025-01159-7. Epub 2025 Feb 15.

    PMID: 39954116BACKGROUND
  • Jakimovski D, Bittner S, Zivadinov R, Morrow SA, Benedict RH, Zipp F, Weinstock-Guttman B. Multiple sclerosis. Lancet. 2024 Jan 13;403(10422):183-202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01473-3. Epub 2023 Nov 7.

    PMID: 37949093BACKGROUND
  • Hvid LG, Gaemelke T, Dalgas U, Slipsager MK, Rasmussen PV, Petersen T, Norgaard M, Skjerbaek AG, Boesen F. Personalised inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation elicits clinically relevant improvements in physical function in patients with multiple sclerosis - The Danish MS Hospitals Rehabilitation Study. Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2021 Feb 17;7(1):2055217321989384. doi: 10.1177/2055217321989384. eCollection 2021 Jan-Mar.

    PMID: 33643662BACKGROUND
  • Hobart JC, Riazi A, Lamping DL, Fitzpatrick R, Thompson AJ. Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12). Neurology. 2003 Jan 14;60(1):31-6. doi: 10.1212/wnl.60.1.31.

    PMID: 12525714BACKGROUND
  • Hahn A, Moeller S, Schlausch A, Ekmann M, de Chelle G, Westerlund M, Braatz F, Mayr W. Effects of a full-body electrostimulation garment application in a cohort of subjects with cerebral palsy, multiple sclerosis, and stroke on upper motor neuron syndrome symptoms. Biomed Tech (Berl). 2023 Sep 12;69(1):49-59. doi: 10.1515/bmt-2023-0271. Print 2024 Feb 26.

    PMID: 38354212BACKGROUND
  • Gijbels D, Dalgas U, Romberg A, de Groot V, Bethoux F, Vaney C, Gebara B, Medina CS, Maamagi H, Rasova K, de Noordhout BM, Knuts K, Feys P. Which walking capacity tests to use in multiple sclerosis? A multicentre study providing the basis for a core set. Mult Scler. 2012 Mar;18(3):364-71. doi: 10.1177/1352458511420598. Epub 2011 Sep 27.

    PMID: 21952098BACKGROUND
  • Feys P, Lamers I, Francis G, Benedict R, Phillips G, LaRocca N, Hudson LD, Rudick R; Multiple Sclerosis Outcome Assessments Consortium. The Nine-Hole Peg Test as a manual dexterity performance measure for multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2017 Apr;23(5):711-720. doi: 10.1177/1352458517690824. Epub 2017 Feb 16.

    PMID: 28206826BACKGROUND
  • Feys, P., Moghames, P., Kasilingam, E., King, R., Manacorda, T., Fonseca, M., Notas, K., & Kos, D. (2024). Prevalence, severity and impact of MS symptoms, and use of services in Europe: Results from the large scale IMSS survey. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 30(3S), 1160.

    BACKGROUND
  • Cameron MH, Wagner JM. Gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis: pathogenesis, evaluation, and advances in treatment. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2011 Oct;11(5):507-15. doi: 10.1007/s11910-011-0214-y.

    PMID: 21779953BACKGROUND
  • Callesen J, Richter C, Kristensen C, Sunesen I, Naesby M, Dalgas U, Skjerbaek AG. Test-retest agreement and reliability of the Six Spot Step Test in persons with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2019 Feb;25(2):286-294. doi: 10.1177/1352458517745725. Epub 2017 Dec 20.

    PMID: 29260609BACKGROUND
  • Buckley E, Mazza C, McNeill A. A systematic review of the gait characteristics associated with Cerebellar Ataxia. Gait Posture. 2018 Feb;60:154-163. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.11.024. Epub 2017 Dec 1.

    PMID: 29220753BACKGROUND
  • Boesen F, Norgaard M, Trenel P, Rasmussen PV, Petersen T, Lovendahl B, Sorensen J. Longer term effectiveness of inpatient multidisciplinary rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in MS patients: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial - The Danish MS Hospitals Rehabilitation Study. Mult Scler. 2018 Mar;24(3):340-349. doi: 10.1177/1352458517735188. Epub 2017 Oct 6.

    PMID: 28984159BACKGROUND
  • Bharmal M, Payne K, Atkinson MJ, Desrosiers MP, Morisky DE, Gemmen E. Validation of an abbreviated Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9) among patients on antihypertensive medications. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Apr 27;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-36.

    PMID: 19397800BACKGROUND
  • Amatya B, Khan F, Song K, Galea M. Effectiveness of Non-Pharmacological Interventions for Spasticity Management in Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review. Ann Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;48(5):305-343. doi: 10.5535/arm.240064. Epub 2024 Oct 31.

    PMID: 39497494BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Multiple SclerosisCerebellar AtaxiaAtaxiaMuscle Spasticity

Interventions

Standard of Care

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Demyelinating Autoimmune Diseases, CNSAutoimmune Diseases of the Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesDemyelinating DiseasesAutoimmune DiseasesImmune System DiseasesCerebellar DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesDyskinesiasNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMuscular DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesMuscle HypertoniaNeuromuscular Manifestations

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Quality Indicators, Health CareQuality of Health CareHealth Services AdministrationHealth Care Quality, Access, and Evaluation

Study Officials

  • Daphne Kos

    Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Alix-Anne Schreinemacher

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 25, 2025

First Posted

October 1, 2025

Study Start

March 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 6, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-01

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations