NCT07137754

Brief Summary

Both in Denmark and internationally, emergency departments have been overwhelmed for several years by a growing number of patients, combined with a shortage of doctors and nurses. This problem is expected to continue because the number of elderly people with multiple health problems is increasing. To keep providing good quality care in emergency departments, we need to consider new ways of organizing treatment. In Canada, Australia, and the UK, some hospitals have tried a model where specially trained physiotherapists examine and treat patients who come in with muscle and joint injuries and pain. Since these patients make up about 25% of all those referred to emergency departments, this model could help take some pressure off doctors and nurses. That way, doctors and nurses can spend more time caring for seriously ill patients who need urgent help. Several studies on these physiotherapist-led models show benefits for both patients and the healthcare system. Patients report being more satisfied and better informed about their injury and treatment. They wait less, have fewer unnecessary tests, and need fewer repeat visits to the emergency department. However, similar studies have never been done in Scandinavia, even though some Danish emergency departments have tested similar models. Healthcare systems and the education of physiotherapists differ between Scandinavian countries and the countries mentioned above. So, we don't know if we would see the same benefits here. Also, there has been no research on whether this model is cost-effective, which is important for decision-makers when planning future healthcare budgets. With this research project, we want to test a model in Danish hospitals where specially trained physiotherapists take care of examining, treating, and discharging patients with muscle and joint pain and injuries. We will look at how this model affects patient experiences (like pain and satisfaction) and clinical outcomes (like repeat emergency visits and use of imaging tests), compared to the usual practice where doctors handle these patients. We will also study whether the model is cost-effective, meaning whether the benefits of using this approach are worth the costs, or even greater than the costs. The study will be conducted at 4-5 hospitals, where a total of 800 patients with minor musculoskeletal injuries will be included in connection with their visit at the emergency department. Patients will receive questionnaires at 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury regarding patient reported outcomes. Register data will be retrieved at 26 weeks regarding the patients' health care use during follow-up.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
800

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
22mo left

Started Aug 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress29%
Aug 2025Mar 2028

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 15, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 15, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2025

Completed
2.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2028

Expected
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 28, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

August 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 22, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Brief pain inventory short form

    BPI short form is a self-reported questionnaire, using the 7 items pain interference on functional ability, mood, sleep and work. The patient completes the assessment at baseline, 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury

    From baseline (time of injury) to 12 weeks follow-up

  • Euroqol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels

    The EQ5D assesses health-related quality of life using 5 items. It is used as the primary outcome for qualculation of QUALYs in the health economic analysis.

    From baseline to 26 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Visit-specific satisfaction questionnaire

    Is collected at week 1 after baseline

  • PROMIS short form physical function

    From baseline to 12 weeks after.

  • PROMIS short form upper extremety

    From baseline to 12 weeks

  • Work Productivity and Activity Impairment

    From baseline to 12 weeks

  • Return-visits to emergency department

    From baseline to 12 week follow-up

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Advanced practice physiotherapy

EXPERIMENTAL

Advanced practice physiotherapists will independently diagnose, manage and discharge patients

Other: Advanced practice physiotherapy

Usual care

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Nurses and physicians in the emergency department will diagnose, manage and discharge patients as per usual care

Other: Usual Care

Interventions

Physiotherapists undergoing post-graduate education as advanced practice physiotherapists will independently diagnose, manage and discharge patients.

Advanced practice physiotherapy

Nurses and physicians in the emergency department will diagnose, manage and discharge patients as usual

Usual care

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Musculoskeletal pain and injury to the upper or lower extremities
  • Triaged non-urgent (blue) in the emergency department
  • Speaks and understands Danish

You may not qualify if:

  • High velocity trauma
  • Cognitively unable to participate
  • Non-malignant conditions (cancer, inflammation, infection)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Aarhus University Hospital

Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Musculoskeletal Diseases

Study Officials

  • Nanna Rolving, Associate professor

    Aarhus University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Nanna Rolving, Associate professor

CONTACT

Louise Mortensen, PhD student

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 15, 2025

First Posted

August 22, 2025

Study Start

August 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Last Updated

August 28, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Locations