Effect and Cost of a Physiotherapy-led Care Model in Emergency Departments for Patients With Minor Musculoskeletal Injuries
Effect and Cost-effectiveness of a Physiotherapy-led Care Model for Patients Referred to an Emergency Department Due to Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Multicentre Quasi-randomized Clinical Trial
2 other identifiers
interventional
800
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Both in Denmark and internationally, emergency departments have been overwhelmed for several years by a growing number of patients, combined with a shortage of doctors and nurses. This problem is expected to continue because the number of elderly people with multiple health problems is increasing. To keep providing good quality care in emergency departments, we need to consider new ways of organizing treatment. In Canada, Australia, and the UK, some hospitals have tried a model where specially trained physiotherapists examine and treat patients who come in with muscle and joint injuries and pain. Since these patients make up about 25% of all those referred to emergency departments, this model could help take some pressure off doctors and nurses. That way, doctors and nurses can spend more time caring for seriously ill patients who need urgent help. Several studies on these physiotherapist-led models show benefits for both patients and the healthcare system. Patients report being more satisfied and better informed about their injury and treatment. They wait less, have fewer unnecessary tests, and need fewer repeat visits to the emergency department. However, similar studies have never been done in Scandinavia, even though some Danish emergency departments have tested similar models. Healthcare systems and the education of physiotherapists differ between Scandinavian countries and the countries mentioned above. So, we don't know if we would see the same benefits here. Also, there has been no research on whether this model is cost-effective, which is important for decision-makers when planning future healthcare budgets. With this research project, we want to test a model in Danish hospitals where specially trained physiotherapists take care of examining, treating, and discharging patients with muscle and joint pain and injuries. We will look at how this model affects patient experiences (like pain and satisfaction) and clinical outcomes (like repeat emergency visits and use of imaging tests), compared to the usual practice where doctors handle these patients. We will also study whether the model is cost-effective, meaning whether the benefits of using this approach are worth the costs, or even greater than the costs. The study will be conducted at 4-5 hospitals, where a total of 800 patients with minor musculoskeletal injuries will be included in connection with their visit at the emergency department. Patients will receive questionnaires at 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury regarding patient reported outcomes. Register data will be retrieved at 26 weeks regarding the patients' health care use during follow-up.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2028
August 28, 2025
August 1, 2025
2.5 years
August 15, 2025
August 22, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Brief pain inventory short form
BPI short form is a self-reported questionnaire, using the 7 items pain interference on functional ability, mood, sleep and work. The patient completes the assessment at baseline, 1, 4, 12 and 26 weeks after injury
From baseline (time of injury) to 12 weeks follow-up
Euroqol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels
The EQ5D assesses health-related quality of life using 5 items. It is used as the primary outcome for qualculation of QUALYs in the health economic analysis.
From baseline to 26 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Visit-specific satisfaction questionnaire
Is collected at week 1 after baseline
PROMIS short form physical function
From baseline to 12 weeks after.
PROMIS short form upper extremety
From baseline to 12 weeks
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment
From baseline to 12 weeks
Return-visits to emergency department
From baseline to 12 week follow-up
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Advanced practice physiotherapy
EXPERIMENTALAdvanced practice physiotherapists will independently diagnose, manage and discharge patients
Usual care
ACTIVE COMPARATORNurses and physicians in the emergency department will diagnose, manage and discharge patients as per usual care
Interventions
Physiotherapists undergoing post-graduate education as advanced practice physiotherapists will independently diagnose, manage and discharge patients.
Nurses and physicians in the emergency department will diagnose, manage and discharge patients as usual
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Musculoskeletal pain and injury to the upper or lower extremities
- Triaged non-urgent (blue) in the emergency department
- Speaks and understands Danish
You may not qualify if:
- High velocity trauma
- Cognitively unable to participate
- Non-malignant conditions (cancer, inflammation, infection)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aarhus University Hospitallead
- Slagelse Hospitalcollaborator
- Gødstrup Hospitalcollaborator
- Université de Montréalcollaborator
- Independent Research Fund Denmarkcollaborator
- University of Aarhuscollaborator
- Danske Fysioterapeutercollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Nanna Rolving, Associate professor
Aarhus University Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 15, 2025
First Posted
August 22, 2025
Study Start
August 15, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2028
Last Updated
August 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08