Chewing Gum vs. Ondansetron as Rescue Treatment for PONV in Female Patients
A Randomized Clinical Trial; Chewing Gum vs. Ondansetron as Rescue Treatment for PONV in Female Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Surgery at a Single Centre in Lebanon
1 other identifier
interventional
90
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The proposed randomized clinical trial aims to test and compare the efficacy of chewing gum vs. Intravenous antiemetic ondansetron as rescue treatment for post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) among Lebanese female patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery in the post-operative anesthesia care unit (PACU).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_1
Started Aug 2025
Shorter than P25 for phase_1
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 22, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 28, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 28, 2026
CompletedOctober 1, 2025
September 1, 2025
6 months
August 22, 2025
September 23, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complete cessation of PONV with no recurrence and no rescue medication
2 hours
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Patient satisfaction
post-operative period ( up to 3 hours)
Quantity of rescue treatment modalities used
immediately after PONV start until complete resolution of symptoms
Study Arms (3)
Ondansetron
ACTIVE COMPARATORChewing Gum
EXPERIMENTALOndansetron + Chewing Gum
SHAM COMPARATORInterventions
Ondansetron 4 mg IV push Peppermint sugar free chewing gum
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females
- Aged 18 and above,
- Weight 40kg and above,
- Who have undergone laparoscopic
- Surgery under volatile anesthetic-based general anesthesia.
You may not qualify if:
- Have history of motion sickness,
- Maintained anesthesia during surgery using Propofol-pump
- Were given antiemetics within 8 hours pre-surgery
- Allergy to ondansetron
- Planned mechanical ventilation post-operation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Makassed General Hospital
Beirut, Lebanon
Related Publications (1)
Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51.
PMID: 2286697BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Chairman of Anesthesia Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 22, 2025
First Posted
October 1, 2025
Study Start
August 22, 2025
Primary Completion
February 28, 2026
Study Completion
February 28, 2026
Last Updated
October 1, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share