RCT of Cervical Ripening Double Ballon Catheter Prior to Dilation and Evacuation.
CRDB RCT
Cervical Ripening Double Balloon Catheters Versus Osmotic Dilators For Cervical Preparation Before Dilation & Evacuation: A Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the overnight use of an FDA-cleared CRDB catheter is superior to the use of overnight osmotic dilators as is standard of care cervical preparation for patients presenting for dilation and evacuation (D\&E). The CRDB catheter is an FDA cleared device for cervical dilation prior to labor induction at term. It has not been FDA cleared for cervical dilation in the second-trimester, however, will be used in a similar fashion to labor inductions at term. Our standard of care osmotic dilators (e.g., laminaria, Dilapan-S) are both FDA cleared for cervical dilation prior to labor induction at term or gynecologic procedures requiring cervical dilation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 3, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2028
February 5, 2026
February 1, 2026
1.7 years
September 22, 2025
February 2, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Mean Cervical Dilation
Cervical dilation will be measured in centimeters.
Day 1 (cervical preparation visit) to Day 2 (D&E)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Need for Mechanical Dilation at the Time of Procedural Abortion
Day 2 (D&E)
Mean Total Procedure Time
Day 2 (D&E)
Study Arms (2)
Cervical Ripening Double Balloon (CRDB) Catheter
EXPERIMENTALOsmotic Dilators
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The physician will place a CRDB catheter for overnight cervical preparation. The CRDB catheter is comprised of two balloons that can be inflated with up to 80 mL of sterile water.
Osmotic dilators (e.g., laminaria and Dilapan-S) are mechanical dilators that are placed in the cervix prior to gynecologic procedures and facilitate dilation through the slow absorption of moisture. The physician will place osmotic dilators in the standard fashion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Singleton pregnancy between 19 weeks 0 days to 23 weeks 6 days GD.
- Planning to undergo D\&E with Yale Family Planning and has undergone standard informed clinical consent counseling for the procedure and signed the clinical procedure consent form.
- Stated willingness to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the active part of the study.
- English- or Spanish-speaking individual.
- Residents of the state of Connecticut.
You may not qualify if:
- Spontaneous or induced fetal demise.
- Multiple pregnancy.
- Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).
- Intraamniotic infection.
- Active genital tract infection.
- Active vaginal bleeding.
- Placenta previa or vasa previa.
- Placenta accreta spectrum.
- History of \>3 cesarean deliveries.
- BMI \>45 kg/m2.
- Contraindication to osmotic cervical dilator or CRDB catheter use as determined by the physician.
- Contraindication to medication used during standard of care cervical preparation.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Yale Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Yale Family Planning Clinic
New Haven, Connecticut, 06519, United States
Related Publications (19)
Atad J, Hallak M, Auslender R, Porat-Packer T, Zarfati D, Abramovici H. A randomized comparison of prostaglandin E2, oxytocin, and the double-balloon device in inducing labor. Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Feb;87(2):223-7. doi: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00389-4.
PMID: 8559528BACKGROUNDCook Medical. Cook Cervical Ripening Balloon with Stylet.
BACKGROUNDHarris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009 Apr;42(2):377-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010. Epub 2008 Sep 30.
PMID: 18929686BACKGROUNDLiu SM, Henkel A, Meza P, Shorter JM, Cahill E, Blumenthal PD, Shaw KA. Comparing transcervical balloon with osmotic dilators for cervical preparation prior to procedural abortion: A noninferiority randomized trial. Contraception. 2024 Dec;140:110550. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110550. Epub 2024 Jul 25.
PMID: 39067560BACKGROUNDOrnat L, Alonso-Ventura V, Bueno-Notivol J, Chedraui P, Perez-Lopez FR; Health Outcomes and Systematic Analyses (HOUSSAY) Research Group. Misoprostol combined with cervical single or double balloon catheters versus misoprostol alone for labor induction of singleton pregnancies: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2020 Oct;33(20):3453-3468. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1574741. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
PMID: 30741051BACKGROUNDSolt I, Frank Wolf M, Ben-Haroush S, Kaminskyi S, Ophir E, Bornstein J. Foley catheter versus cervical double balloon for labor induction: a prospective randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Apr;34(7):1034-1041. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1623776. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
PMID: 31185762BACKGROUNDHoppe KK, Schiff MA, Peterson SE, Gravett MG. 30 mL Single- versus 80 mL double-balloon catheter for pre-induction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(12):1919-25. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1067297.
PMID: 26302817BACKGROUNDCook Medical. (2021) A nonpharmaceutical option for preinduction dilation. Cervical ripening balloon with stylet.
BACKGROUNDAtad J, Hallak M, Ben-David Y, Auslender R, Abramovici H. Ripening and dilatation of the unfavourable cervix for induction of labour by a double balloon device: experience with 250 cases. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Jan;104(1):29-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1997.tb10644.x.
PMID: 8988692BACKGROUNDBeaty O 3rd, Sloop CH, Schmid HE Jr, Buckalew VM Jr. Renin response and angiotensinogen control during graded hemorrhage and shock in the dog. Am J Physiol. 1976 Oct;231(4):1300-7. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1976.231.4.1300.
PMID: 984215BACKGROUNDEmbrey MP, Mollison BG. The unfavourable cervix and induction of labour using a cervical balloon. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Commonw. 1967 Feb;74(1):44-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1967.tb03931.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 6018096BACKGROUND"Options for second-trimester termination." Contemporary OB/GYN, Nov. 2013, www.contemporaryobgyn.net/view/options-second-trimester-termination. Accessed 16 Mar. 2025.
BACKGROUNDLambert SJ, Lunde B, Porsch L, Stoffels G, MacIsaac L, Dayananda I, Dragoman MV. Adjuvant misoprostol or mifepristone for cervical preparation with osmotic dilators before dilation and evacuation. Contraception. 2024 Apr;132:110364. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110364. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
PMID: 38218312BACKGROUNDWhite KO, Jones HE, Shorter J, Norman WV, Guilbert E, Lichtenberg ES, Paul M. Second-trimester surgical abortion practices in the United States. Contraception. 2018 Apr 14:S0010-7824(18)30140-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.04.004. Online ahead of print.
PMID: 29665357BACKGROUNDCasey FE, Ye PP, Perritt JD, Moreno-Ruiz NL, Reeves MF. A randomized controlled trial evaluating same-day mifepristone and misoprostol compared to misoprostol alone for cervical preparation prior to second-trimester surgical abortion. Contraception. 2016 Aug;94(2):127-33. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.02.032. Epub 2016 Mar 4.
PMID: 26948184BACKGROUNDGoldberg AB, Fortin JA, Drey EA, Dean G, Lichtenberg ES, Bednarek PH, Chen BA, Dutton C, McKetta S, Maurer R, Winikoff B, Fitzmaurice GM. Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation Using Adjunctive Misoprostol or Mifepristone Compared With Overnight Osmotic Dilators Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):599-609. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000977.
PMID: 26196084BACKGROUNDShaw KA, Shaw JG, Hugin M, Velasquez G, Hopkins FW, Blumenthal PD. Adjunct mifepristone for cervical preparation prior to dilation and evacuation: a randomized trial. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):313-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.11.014. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
PMID: 25499589BACKGROUNDDiedrich JT, Drey EA, Newmann SJ. Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 20-24 weeks' gestation. Contraception. 2020 May;101(5):286-292. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2020.01.002. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
PMID: 32007418BACKGROUNDSanchez-Ramos L, Levine LD, Sciscione AC, Mozurkewich EL, Ramsey PS, Adair CD, Kaunitz AM, McKinney JA. Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Mar;230(3S):S669-S695. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.02.009. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
PMID: 38462252BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Tessa Madden, MD
Yale University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2025
First Posted
September 30, 2025
Study Start
December 3, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
September 1, 2028
Last Updated
February 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share