Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation
2 other identifiers
interventional
300
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to compare three different ways of opening a woman's cervix before her second-trimester surgical abortion.
- Osmotic dilators: small rods that, when inserted into the cervix, gently expand to open the cervix
- Osmotic dilators plus mifepristone, a medicine that is swallowed
- Osmotic dilators plus misoprostol, a medicine that is placed between the cheek and gum Hypotheses:
- adding buccal misoprostol 3 hours preoperatively will significantly improve dilation compared to laminaria alone, making procedures faster, easier and safer.
- adding oral mifepristone at the time of laminaria placement will confer a similar benefit.
- the efficacy of adjunctive misoprostol and mifepristone will be influenced by gestational age, with women later in gestation having increased efficacy from these agents.
- significantly more patients who receive adjunctive misoprostol or mifepristone will have adequate initial dilation, fewer will require manual dilation or additional cervical preparation and there will be fewer complications in these arms, although complication rates will be low and we will only be able to detect relatively large differences.
- patients will prefer to have the procedure done as quickly as possible with as little discomfort as possible, that cervical ripening with adjunctive misoprostol will be associated with more cramping than osmotic dilators alone and that mifepristone will be well tolerated and may not cause more cramping or other side effects than osmotic dilators alone.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2013
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 17, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 24, 2016
CompletedFebruary 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
1.1 years
December 12, 2012
September 2, 2015
January 27, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Operative Time
The duration of the D\&E procedure was measured with a stopwatch, starting with the first instrument that passes into the uterus and ending when the last instrument is removed from the uterus upon completion of the D\&E
participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Initial Cervical Dilation
participants were assessed during cervical dilation process, average time of 1 minute
Ability to Complete the D&E on the First Attempt
participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes
Need for Mechanical Dilation
participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes
Ease of Mechanical Dilation
participants were assessed for the duration of the procedure, an average of 6 minutes
Complications From Procedure
assessed immediately after completion of D&E and at 1 week and 1 month post-procedure
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Osmotic dilators + placebo (vit c) + placebo (vit B12)
OTHERWomen will receive osmotic dilators on Day 1, oral placebo on Day 1, and buccal placebo on Day 2.
Osmotic dilators + placebo (vit c) + misoprostol
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen will receive osmotic dilators on Day 1, oral placebo on Day 1, and buccal misoprostol 400 mcg on Day 2.
Osmotic dilators + mifepristone + placebo (vit B12)
ACTIVE COMPARATORWomen will receive osmotic dilators on Day 1, oral mifepristone 200 mg on Day 1, and buccal placebo on Day 2.
Interventions
oral mifepristone 200 mg on Day 1.
buccal misoprostol 400 mcg on Day 2
osmotic dilators on Day 1
placebo for mifepristone, on day 1
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years and older
- Able to give informed consent
- Medically eligible for outpatient second trimester pregnancy termination at the clinical site
- English-speaking or Spanish-speaking at sites with ability to obtain informed consent in Spanish
You may not qualify if:
- Active bleeding (\>1 pad/hour) or hemodynamically unstable at enrollment
- Signs of chorioamnionitis or clinical infection at enrollment
- Signs of spontaneous labor or cervical insufficiency at enrollment
- Spontaneous intrauterine fetal demise
- Patient incarcerated
- Allergy to mifepristone or misoprostol
- Chronic steroid use or adrenal insufficiency
- Porphyria
- Inflammatory bowel disease requiring treatment
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (7)
San Francisco General Hospital
San Francisco, California, 94110, United States
Family Planning Associates
Chicago, Illinois, 60630, United States
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115, United States
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118, United States
Planned Parenthood of New York City
New York, New York, 10012, United States
Lovejoy Surgical Center
Portland, Oregon, 97210, United States
Magee Women's Hospital
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213, United States
Related Publications (1)
Goldberg AB, Fortin JA, Drey EA, Dean G, Lichtenberg ES, Bednarek PH, Chen BA, Dutton C, McKetta S, Maurer R, Winikoff B, Fitzmaurice GM. Cervical Preparation Before Dilation and Evacuation Using Adjunctive Misoprostol or Mifepristone Compared With Overnight Osmotic Dilators Alone: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Sep;126(3):599-609. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000977.
PMID: 26196084DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Limitations include inadequate sample size to measure complications as a primary outcome and reliance on outcomes that measure efficacy of the cervical preparation rather than its direct effect on overall safety.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Principal Investigator
- Organization
- Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigator, MD, MPH
Planned Parenthood League of Massachusetts
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2012
First Posted
December 17, 2012
Study Start
January 1, 2013
Primary Completion
February 1, 2014
Study Completion
June 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 24, 2016
Results First Posted
February 24, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-01