Pain and Health Beliefs in Rehabilitation Outpatients
Pain Beliefs, Spiritual Well-Being, and Health Beliefs on Complementary and Alternative Medicine in Rehabilitation Outpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study
1 other identifier
observational
116
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate the relationships between patients' pain beliefs, health beliefs about complementary and alternative medicine, and levels of spiritual well-being in a Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Adult participants between 18 and 65 years of age were enrolled. Standardized questionnaires were used to evaluate psychological status, pain-related beliefs, attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine, and spiritual well-being. The study aimed to contribute to holistic pain management approaches by integrating psychological, spiritual, and health belief perspectives.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Dec 2024
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 19, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2025
CompletedOctober 3, 2025
September 1, 2025
6 months
September 22, 2025
September 30, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Pain Beliefs Questionnaire
Description: The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire was developed in 1992 by Edwards and colleagues. It contains 12 items. Six items assess organic pain beliefs (score range: 6-30) and four items assess psychological pain beliefs (score range: 4-20). Participants rate each item using a Likert-type scale from 1 to 5. Higher scores on the organic subscale indicate stronger beliefs in an organic cause of pain (considered maladaptive), while higher scores on the psychological subscale indicate stronger beliefs in a psychological origin of pain (considered more adaptive).
At enrollment
Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale
Description: The Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale was developed in 2017 by Eksi and Kardas. It contains 29 items with three subscales: transcendence (11 items, score range: 11-55), harmony with nature (6 items, score range: 6-30), and anomie (12 items, score range: 12-60; reverse-scored). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale. The total score ranges from 29 to 145. Higher total scores indicate greater levels of spiritual well-being (a better outcome).
At enrollment
Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Scale
This scale was developed in 2004 by Lie and Boker. It contains 10 items. Each item is scored on a seven-point Likert scale. Three of the items are reverse-scored. The total score ranges from 10 to 70. Higher scores indicate stronger health beliefs related to complementary and alternative medicine. The scale does not have a cut-off score.
At enrollment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
At enrollment
Complementary, Alternative, and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale
At enrollment
Study Arms (1)
Rehabilitation Outpatients
Adult patients (18-65 years) attending a university hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic. Participants were evaluated once using self-report questionnaires and scales
Interventions
Participants completed a sociodemographic questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire, the Complementary, Alternative, and Conventional Medicine Attitude Scale, the Complementary and Alternative Medicine Health Belief Scale, and the Three-Factor Spiritual Well-Being Scale.
Eligibility Criteria
Adult patients aged 18 to 65 years who attended the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic of a university hospital in Türkiye.
You may qualify if:
- Adults between 18 and 65 years of age
- Attending the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinic
- Able to read and write
- Cognitively intact
- Voluntarily willing to participate and able to provide informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Younger than 18 years or older than 65 years
- Illiterate individuals
- Individuals with cognitive impairment
- Individuals with communication difficulties
- Patients who declined to participate or had incomplete data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Yozgat Bozok University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
Yozgat, Yozgat, 66100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (8)
Uslu, F. (2020). Geleneksel ve tamamlayıcı tıp (getat) sağlık inanış anketinin türkçe geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. (Uzmanlık Tezi). Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi Ankara Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Sağlık Uygulama ve Araştırma Merkezi Aile Hekimliği Kliniği, Ankara. https://tez.yok.gov.tr/UlusalTezMerkezi/ sayfasından erişilmiştir. (Tez Numarası 644233).
BACKGROUNDElif, K. Ö. S. E., Hasan Çetin Ekerbiçer, and Ünal Erkorkmaz. "Complementary, alternative and conventional medicine attitude scale: Turkish validity reliability study." Sakarya Tıp Dergisi 8.4 (2018): 726-736.
BACKGROUNDHyland ME, Lewith GT, Westoby C. Developing a measure of attitudes: the holistic complementary and alternative medicine questionnaire. Complement Ther Med. 2003 Mar;11(1):33-8. doi: 10.1016/s0965-2299(02)00113-9.
PMID: 12667973BACKGROUNDEdwards LC, Pearce SA, Turner-Stokes L, Jones A. The Pain Beliefs Questionnaire: an investigation of beliefs in the causes and consequences of pain. Pain. 1992 Dec;51(3):267-272. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(92)90209-T.
PMID: 1491853BACKGROUNDAydemir, O. J. T. P. D: Hastane Anksiyete ve Depresyon Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenilirliği. Türk Psikiyatri Dergisi, 8, 187-280, 1997.
BACKGROUNDZigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983 Jun;67(6):361-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
PMID: 6880820BACKGROUNDOkan N, Kose N, Kardas S. Spiritual Contradiction Scale: A New Way of Understanding Internal and External Contradictions. J Relig Health. 2024 Apr;63(2):1567-1584. doi: 10.1007/s10943-023-01924-2. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
PMID: 37819529BACKGROUNDBerk HO, Bahadir G. [The experience of chronic pain and pain beliefs]. Agri. 2007 Oct;19(4):5-15. Turkish.
PMID: 18159574BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gülseren Demir Karakılıç, Asst Prof
Yozgat Bozok University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 1 Day
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor, Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2025
First Posted
September 30, 2025
Study Start
December 19, 2024
Primary Completion
June 30, 2025
Study Completion
June 30, 2025
Last Updated
October 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available beginning 6 months after publication of the study results and will remain available for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- De-identified individual participant data and supporting documents will be available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author for academic and research purposes only. Requests will be reviewed by the study investigators, and data will be shared via secure electronic transfer in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines.
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. De-identified data will be shared for academic and research purposes in accordance with institutional and ethical guidelines.