"Bimodal vs Unimodal High-Intensity Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis"
HIPEMF-OAK
Effect of High-Intensity Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy as a Bimodal Intervention for Analgesia and Strengthening in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Clinical Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
64
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized, double-blind clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of high-intensity pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (HI-PEMF) applied either exclusively on the knee joint or bimodally on the knee and quadriceps, in older adults with knee osteoarthritis. Both groups will also receive a structured home-based exercise program. The primary outcome is pain reduction, and secondary outcomes include functional performance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable knee-osteoarthritis
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 15, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 30, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 5, 2026
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 15, 2026
CompletedSeptember 30, 2025
September 1, 2025
5 months
September 22, 2025
September 22, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in pain intensity measured by the Numeric Analog Scale (NAS)
Pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Analog Scale (0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain), reported by the patient at rest and related to the most symptomatic knee. The primary endpoint is the change in NAS score from baseline to end of the 5-week intervention and at 2-month follow-up (approximately week 13). This will allow evaluation of both immediate and sustained effects of the intervention.
Baseline, end of intervention (week 5), and 2-month follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in functional mobility measured by the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test
Baseline, end of intervention (week 5), and 2-month follow-up
Change in lower-limb functional strength measured by the 5-times Sit-to-Stand (5STS) test
Baseline, end of intervention (week 5), and 2-month follow-up
Study Arms (2)
Group A - Unimodal HI-PEMF
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in Group A will receive high-intensity pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (HI-PEMF) applied exclusively to the symptomatic knee (femorotibial joint) for 10 minutes per session, twice a week over 5 weeks, completing a total of 9 sessions. The intervention will use the "Chronic Pain" protocol of the BTL-6000 Super Inductive System. A standardized home-based exercise program will be provided to all participants.
Group B - Bimodal HI-PEMF
EXPERIMENTALParticipants in Group B will receive high-intensity pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (HI-PEMF) applied to both the symptomatic knee (femorotibial joint) and the quadriceps muscle (rectus femoris), with 10 minutes per site, twice a week over 5 weeks, completing a total of 9 sessions. The knee application will follow the "Chronic Pain" protocol, and the quadriceps application will follow the "Muscle Strengthening" protocol, both using the BTL-6000 Super Inductive System. A standardized home-based exercise program will be provided to all participants.
Interventions
High-intensity pulsed electromagnetic field (HI-PEMF) therapy applied to the symptomatic knee using the "Chronic Pain" protocol of the BTL-6000 Super Inductive System, 10-minute duration per session, applied twice per week over 5 weeks (total of 9 sessions). The applicator is positioned 2-3 cm above the patella, without skin contact, with the patient seated or in supine position.
HI-PEMF therapy will be applied to both the symptomatic knee and the quadriceps muscle (rectus femoris). The knee application will follow the same procedure as in Group A, using the "Chronic Pain" protocol of the BTL-6000 Super Inductive System. In addition, the quadriceps will be treated using the "Muscle Strengthening" protocol. Each site will receive 10 minutes of therapy per session, twice per week over 5 weeks (total of 9 sessions). The applicator for the quadriceps will be positioned perpendicular to the muscle belly, without skin contact, with the patient lying supine and a cushion under the knee for slight flexion.
Standardized home-based exercise program prescribed to both groups. It includes five exercises: isometric quadriceps contractions, straight leg raises, seated knee extensions, sit-to-stand from chair, and stationary marching. Participants are instructed to perform the exercises three times per week during the 5-week intervention. Printed instructions and a video guide are provided. Adherence is reinforced via weekly follow-up.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥ 60
- Clinical and radiological diagnosis of knee OA grade I-IV
- Pain ≥ 3 on Numeric Analog Scale for \>6 months
- Can walk (with/without aid)
- Cognitive ability to follow instructions
- Signed informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Prior total knee arthroplasty (unilateral or bilateral)
- Neurological disorders affecting motor function or cognition (e.g., Parkinson's disease, stroke, moderate to severe dementia)
- Active inflammatory rheumatic diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, lupus)
- Presence of pacemakers, implantable defibrillators, or metallic implants near the treatment area
- Current use of other physical therapy modalities for pain (e.g., electrotherapy, ultrasound, TENS) outside the study protocol
- Participation in another clinical trial within the past 3 months
- Current use of NSAIDs or systemic/local corticosteroids (including intra-articular injections)
- Open wounds or active infections at the treatment site
- Decompensated cardiac conditions or medical contraindication to exercise
- Vestibular disorders that affect balance and interfere with functional assessments
- Uncorrected visual impairment interfering with gait or balance (visual acuity worse than 20/60 in the better eye, assessed by Snellen chart)
- Withdrawal Criteria:
- Participants who complete fewer than 7 out of the 9 planned intervention sessions (i.e., less than 80% adherence)
- Occurrence of serious adverse events related to the intervention that contraindicate continuation
- Repeated non-compliance with the home exercise program, documented in at least two consecutive weekly follow-up reports
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Hospital Civil de Guadalajara "Fray Antonio Alcalde"
Guadalajara, Jalisco, 44280, Mexico
Related Publications (3)
Iannitti T, Fistetto G, Esposito A, Rottigni V, Palmieri B. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy for management of osteoarthritis-related pain, stiffness and physical function: clinical experience in the elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:1289-93. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S35926. Epub 2013 Sep 26.
PMID: 24106421BACKGROUNDOng MT, Man GC, Lau LC, He X, Qiu J, Wang Q, Chow MC, Choi BC, Yu M, Yung PS. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field as an intervention for patients with quadriceps weakness after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial. Trials. 2022 Sep 12;23(1):771. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06674-2.
PMID: 36096886BACKGROUNDBagnato GL, Miceli G, Marino N, Sciortino D, Bagnato GF. Pulsed electromagnetic fields in knee osteoarthritis: a double blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2016 Apr;55(4):755-62. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kev426. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
PMID: 26705327BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants were informed that the intervention would be applied to the lower limb without specifying the anatomical region. The HI-PEMF equipment produces no perceptible sensations, aiding participant blinding. Outcome assessors were independent and unaware of group assignment. Care providers administering the intervention were not blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Physician Specialist, Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 22, 2025
First Posted
September 30, 2025
Study Start
September 15, 2025
Primary Completion
February 5, 2026
Study Completion
April 15, 2026
Last Updated
September 30, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study is conducted within a public hospital setting without external funding, and there is no current plan or infrastructure to support secondary data sharing. Data will be used exclusively for the primary objectives outlined in the approved protocol.