DELINEATE-Prospective
DELINEATE
Deep Learning for Echo Analysis, Tracking, and Evaluation Prospective Evaluation (DELINEATE-Prospective)
1 other identifier
observational
50
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Heart disease is the leading cause of death in the United States, and echocardiography (or "echo") is the most common way doctors look at the heart. Echo is safe, painless, and can detect major heart problems, including weak heart pumping and valve disease. Valve disease, especially aortic stenosis (narrowing) and mitral regurgitation (leakage), is common in older adults but often goes undiagnosed. While echo is the main tool for finding valve problems, it takes time, requires expert training, and results can vary between readers. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), especially deep learning (DL), have shown promise in automatically analyzing heart images. However, past research hasn't fully tackled key echo techniques-like color Doppler and spectral Doppler-that are crucial for measuring how blood moves through heart valves. AI tools also face challenges in being used in everyday medical practice because of workflow issues, lack of real-world testing, and concerns about how the algorithms make decisions. At Columbia University Irving Medical Center, researchers have built a large database of heart tests over the last six years and developed AI programs to analyze echocardiograms. The current study will test whether providing AI analysis to cardiologists in real time during echo reading can make the process faster and more consistent.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Apr 2026
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 15, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
April 16, 2026
April 1, 2026
1.5 years
August 14, 2025
April 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Clinically Meaningful Reclassification by Panel Review
Proportion of cases where the expert panel reclassifies valvular regurgitation severity by at least one grade (upgrade or downgrade). The proportion will be calculated as the number of cases with reclassification ÷ total number of cases reviewed.
18 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of Cases with AI-Based Reclassification Leading to a Change in Clinical Management
18 months
Proportion of Cases with AI-Based Reclassification Leading to Referral to a Valve Specialist or Surgeon
18 months
Proportion of Cases with AI-Based Reclassification Leading to a Change in Frequency of Follow-Up Echocardiography
18 months
Proportion of Cases with AI-Based Reclassification Leading to Referral for Further Testing (TEE or Cardiac MRI)
18 months
Other Outcomes (5)
Concordance Between AI and Panel Review
18 months
Concordance Between Cardiologist Clinical Read and Panel Review
18 months
Comparison of Concordance Rates (AI vs Cardiologist) Against Panel Review
18 months
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Intervention Group
Studies meeting the following criteria will undergo adjudication by an expert panel: Moderate, moderate-severe, or severe mitral, aortic, or tricuspid regurgitation by physician or AI model assessment. Discrepancy between physician and AI interpretations, where AI-assessed severity is greater than the physician-assessed severity (i.e. indicates that more valvular regurgitation is present)
Control Group
A stratified random sample of cases will be selected to match the distribution of AI-flagged cases by physician-assessed valvular regurgitation severity and will undergo the same expert panel adjudication.
Eligibility Criteria
Board-certified attending cardiologists at Columbia University, ColumbiaDoctors, or NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital who interpret transthoracic echocardiograms in the Columbia echocardiography laboratory and have provided informed consent to participate
You may qualify if:
- Attending cardiologist employed by Columbia University, ColumbiaDoctors, or NewYork Presbyterian Hospital who reads transthoracic echocardiograms in the Columbia echocardiography laboratory
- Provided informed consent to take part in the questionnaires or pivotal study
You may not qualify if:
- Physician in training (cardiology fellow or advanced imaging fellow)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Columbia Universitylead
- American Heart Associationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Pierre A Elias, MD
Columbia University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor of Medicine in the Department of Biomedical Informatics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2025
First Posted
September 29, 2025
Study Start
April 15, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
April 16, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Patient privacy and confidentiality: Even with de-identification, sharing detailed health data could risk re-identification of participants. Regulatory restrictions: Institutional Review Boards (IRBs), HIPAA rules, or local laws may limit data sharing, especially for sensitive health information like echocardiograms. Consent limitations: If participants did not explicitly consent to broad data sharing at enrollment, the study cannot ethically or legally provide their IPD.