NCT07194798

Brief Summary

aims to compare the efficacy of the posterior pericardial window versus retro-cardiac drain in preventing postoperative atrial fibrillation and pericardial complications following CABG, while assessing their impact on hospital and ICU stay, pericardial effusions, re exploration for bleeding, post-operative blood transfusions, and mortality.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
122

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for all trials

Timeline
5mo left

Started Oct 2025

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress60%
Oct 2025Dec 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 19, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 26, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 1, 2025

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 26, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 19, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 19, 2025

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Incidence of postoperative atrial fibrillation and pericardial complications

    Postoperative atrial fibrillation will be detected by continuous ECG monitoring during hospitalization. Pericardial complications, including early and late pericardial effusion, cardiac tamponade, and pleural effusion, will be assessed using echocardiography. The outcome will be reported as the number and percentage of participants experiencing any of these events.

    During hospitalization and up to 3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Postoperative clinical outcomes (ICU stay, hospital stay, revision surgery, and in-hospital mortality)

    From surgery until hospital discharge (up to 30 days)

Study Arms (2)

Group 1: 61 patients undergoing CABG will have a posterior pericardial window created for drainage.

Based on determining the main outcome variable, the estimated minimum required sample size is 122 patients (61 patients in each group). * Group I (Posterior Pericardial Window group): 61 patients undergoing CABG will have a posterior pericardial window created for drainage. * Group II (Retro-cardiac Drain group): 61 patients undergoing CABG will receive a retro-cardiac drain for pericardial drainage.

Group 2 : 61 patients undergoing CABG will receive a retro-cardiac drain for pericardial drainage.

Based on determining the main outcome variable, the estimated minimum required sample size is 122 patients (61 patients in each group). * Group I (Posterior Pericardial Window group): 61 patients undergoing CABG will have a posterior pericardial window created for drainage. * Group II (Retro-cardiac Drain group): 61 patients undergoing CABG will receive a retro-cardiac drain for pericardial drainage.

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study population will include adult patients scheduled to undergo elective, first-time, isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery via median sternotomy. Eligible participants will be hemodynamically stable and able to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Patients will be randomized intraoperatively to receive either a posterior pericardial window or a retro-cardiac drain for postoperative management.

You may qualify if:

  • Adult patients (aged 18 and above) scheduled for elective, first-time coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).
  • Patients with preserved left ventricular function (ejection fraction ≥ 35%).
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with follow-up protocols.
  • No prior history of atrial fibrillation or other significant arrhythmias.

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients undergoing combined cardiac procedures (e.g., valve repair or replacement).
  • Emergency CABG cases or re-operations.
  • Known bleeding disorders or ongoing anticoagulation therapy that cannot be paused.
  • Severe pericardial adhesions or anatomical abnormalities preventing safe creation of a posterior pericardial window.
  • Chronic pulmonary disease or pleural pathology that may interfere with drainage assessment.
  • Patients with active infections or systemic inflammatory conditions.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (7)

  • Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, Rizzo RJ, Couper GS, VanderVliet M, Collins JJ Jr, Cohn LH, Burstin HR. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation. 1996 Aug 1;94(3):390-7. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.94.3.390.

    PMID: 8759081BACKGROUND
  • Kalavrouziotis D, Buth KJ, Ali IS. The impact of new-onset atrial fibrillation on in-hospital mortality following cardiac surgery. Chest. 2007 Mar;131(3):833-839. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-0735.

    PMID: 17356100BACKGROUND
  • Almassi GH, Schowalter T, Nicolosi AC, Aggarwal A, Moritz TE, Henderson WG, Tarazi R, Shroyer AL, Sethi GK, Grover FL, Hammermeister KE. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a major morbid event? Ann Surg. 1997 Oct;226(4):501-11; discussion 511-3. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199710000-00011.

    PMID: 9351718BACKGROUND
  • Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, Ramsay J, Duke P, Mazer CD, Barash PG, Hsu PH, Mangano DT; Investigators of the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation; Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA. 2004 Apr 14;291(14):1720-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.291.14.1720.

    PMID: 15082699BACKGROUND
  • Maisel WH, Rawn JD, Stevenson WG. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Dec 18;135(12):1061-73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-135-12-200112180-00010.

    PMID: 11747385BACKGROUND
  • Xiong T, Pu L, Ma YF, Zhu YL, Li H, Cui X, Li YX. Posterior pericardiotomy to prevent new-onset atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10 randomized controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021 Aug 14;16(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s13019-021-01611-x.

    PMID: 34391454BACKGROUND
  • Ranjan R, Kapetanakis S, Chandrasekaran V, Kaba RA, Momin AU. Posterior Pericardial Window and a Single Pleural Drain: A Dual Defence Against Post-CABG Pericardial Effusion and Atrial Fibrillation. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2025 Apr 15;21:481-487. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S521874. eCollection 2025.

    PMID: 40255667BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Arrhythmias, CardiacHeart DiseasesCardiovascular DiseasesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Central Study Contacts

Ahmed mohamed saad, Principal Investigator

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2025

First Posted

September 26, 2025

Study Start

October 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

September 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09