Innovative Closed-loop Functional Electrical Stimulation Control System for Augmenting Post-stroke Gait
2 other identifiers
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the performance of a novel data-driven model-predictive controller (MPC) based functional electrical stimulation (FES) system versus a conventional FES system for footdrop correction during treadmill and overground walking tasks in people post-stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2026
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 17, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2026
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2026
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2026
March 25, 2026
March 1, 2026
2 months
September 17, 2025
March 23, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Number of Adverse Events
Safety is assessed as the number of adverse events experienced by study participants.
Day 1
Count of Risks
Safety is assessed as the count of risks, including falling, discomfort, pain, skin problems, fatigue, and soreness.
Day 1
Participant Perception of Comfort
Participant perception of comfort is measured on an 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, where 10 is the most comfortable.
Day 1
Participant Perception of Acceptability
Participant perception of acceptability is measured on an 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, where 10 is the most acceptable.
Day 1
Percent of Gait Cycles with Footdrop Correction
Feasibility of the FES control system is assessed as the percentage of gait cycles with footdrop correction. The FES control system is considered effective if greater than 80% of gait cycles have footdrop correction.
Day 1
Number of Participants Completing Gait Bouts
Feasibility of the FES control system is assessed as the number of participants who are able to complete gait bouts with the MPC FES system. The FES control system is considered effective if greater than 80% of participants are able to complete gait bouts.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle During Swing
Day 1
Overground Walking Distance
Day 1
FES Intensity
Day 1
Study Arms (2)
MPC FES Followed by Conventional FES
EXPERIMENTALPost-stroke participants participating in both treadmill and overground walking trials with the novel model-predictive controller (MPC) functional electrical stimulation (FES) system first and with a conventional functional electrical stimulation (FES) system second.
Conventional FES Followed by MPC FES
EXPERIMENTALPost-stroke participants participating in both treadmill and overground walking trials with a conventional functional electrical stimulation (FES) system first and the novel model-predictive controller (MPC) functional electrical stimulation (FES) system second.
Interventions
The model-predictive controller (MPC) determines the timing and intensity of electrical stimulation delivered for FES. MPC combined with real-time ultrasound-based feedback delivers optimal FES intensities and minimizes fatigue. FES is delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using a commercially available FDA-approved electrical stimulator.
For functional electrical stimulation, surface electrodes are placed on the paretic leg on skin overlying the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, with intensity pre-set to elicit dorsiflexion to neutral against gravity. FES will be delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using a commercially available FDA-approved electrical stimulator.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- \>6 months since stroke
- cortical or subcortical stroke
- able to walk 10-meters with or without an assistive device
- sufficient cardiovascular health and ankle stability to walk on treadmill without ankle orthosis
- passive ankle range of motion to benefit from dorsiflexor FES assistance
- resting heart rate 40-100 bpm
You may not qualify if:
- cerebellar signs
- score \>1 on question 1b (does not know the current month and age) and \>0 on question 1c (can not blink eyes and squeeze hands) on NIH Stroke Scale
- inability to communicate with investigators
- neglect/hemianopia
- unexplained dizziness in past 6 months
- sensory loss in paretic leg
- musculoskeletal or medical conditions limiting walking
- neurologic diagnoses other than stroke
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Emory Rehabilitation Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Trisha Kesar, PT, PhD
Emory University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 17, 2025
First Posted
September 24, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
June 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2026
Last Updated
March 25, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Data will be made available for sharing beginning 9 months and for 2 years after publication of the manuscript presenting the study primary results.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be made available for sharing with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the aims proposed by the requestor. Proposed purposes for using the shared data include replication studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and other special requests. Researchers wanting to use data from this study should direct their requests to tkesar@emory.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
De-identified individual participant data for primary dependent variables that underlie the results reported in publications from this study (such as text, tables, appendices) will be made available for sharing with other researchers.