NCT07189819

Brief Summary

This study will compare the performance of a novel data-driven model-predictive controller (MPC) based functional electrical stimulation (FES) system versus a conventional FES system for footdrop correction during treadmill and overground walking tasks in people post-stroke.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
20

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Jun 2026

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 17, 2025

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2025

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2026

Expected
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2026

4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

September 17, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 23, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

post-stroke gait

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of Adverse Events

    Safety is assessed as the number of adverse events experienced by study participants.

    Day 1

  • Count of Risks

    Safety is assessed as the count of risks, including falling, discomfort, pain, skin problems, fatigue, and soreness.

    Day 1

  • Participant Perception of Comfort

    Participant perception of comfort is measured on an 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, where 10 is the most comfortable.

    Day 1

  • Participant Perception of Acceptability

    Participant perception of acceptability is measured on an 10-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 10, where 10 is the most acceptable.

    Day 1

  • Percent of Gait Cycles with Footdrop Correction

    Feasibility of the FES control system is assessed as the percentage of gait cycles with footdrop correction. The FES control system is considered effective if greater than 80% of gait cycles have footdrop correction.

    Day 1

  • Number of Participants Completing Gait Bouts

    Feasibility of the FES control system is assessed as the number of participants who are able to complete gait bouts with the MPC FES system. The FES control system is considered effective if greater than 80% of participants are able to complete gait bouts.

    Day 1

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Peak Ankle Dorsiflexion Angle During Swing

    Day 1

  • Overground Walking Distance

    Day 1

  • FES Intensity

    Day 1

Study Arms (2)

MPC FES Followed by Conventional FES

EXPERIMENTAL

Post-stroke participants participating in both treadmill and overground walking trials with the novel model-predictive controller (MPC) functional electrical stimulation (FES) system first and with a conventional functional electrical stimulation (FES) system second.

Device: Model-Predictive Controller (MPC) Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)Device: Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)

Conventional FES Followed by MPC FES

EXPERIMENTAL

Post-stroke participants participating in both treadmill and overground walking trials with a conventional functional electrical stimulation (FES) system first and the novel model-predictive controller (MPC) functional electrical stimulation (FES) system second.

Device: Model-Predictive Controller (MPC) Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)Device: Conventional Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES)

Interventions

The model-predictive controller (MPC) determines the timing and intensity of electrical stimulation delivered for FES. MPC combined with real-time ultrasound-based feedback delivers optimal FES intensities and minimizes fatigue. FES is delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using a commercially available FDA-approved electrical stimulator.

Conventional FES Followed by MPC FESMPC FES Followed by Conventional FES

For functional electrical stimulation, surface electrodes are placed on the paretic leg on skin overlying the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, with intensity pre-set to elicit dorsiflexion to neutral against gravity. FES will be delivered to the ankle dorsiflexor muscles using a commercially available FDA-approved electrical stimulator.

Conventional FES Followed by MPC FESMPC FES Followed by Conventional FES

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • \>6 months since stroke
  • cortical or subcortical stroke
  • able to walk 10-meters with or without an assistive device
  • sufficient cardiovascular health and ankle stability to walk on treadmill without ankle orthosis
  • passive ankle range of motion to benefit from dorsiflexor FES assistance
  • resting heart rate 40-100 bpm

You may not qualify if:

  • cerebellar signs
  • score \>1 on question 1b (does not know the current month and age) and \>0 on question 1c (can not blink eyes and squeeze hands) on NIH Stroke Scale
  • inability to communicate with investigators
  • neglect/hemianopia
  • unexplained dizziness in past 6 months
  • sensory loss in paretic leg
  • musculoskeletal or medical conditions limiting walking
  • neurologic diagnoses other than stroke

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Emory Rehabilitation Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Trisha Kesar, PT, PhD

    Emory University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Trisha Kesar, PT, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Model Details: Participants are randomized to the order of the test conditions.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2025

First Posted

September 24, 2025

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Last Updated

March 25, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data for primary dependent variables that underlie the results reported in publications from this study (such as text, tables, appendices) will be made available for sharing with other researchers.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
Time Frame
Data will be made available for sharing beginning 9 months and for 2 years after publication of the manuscript presenting the study primary results.
Access Criteria
Data will be made available for sharing with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal to achieve the aims proposed by the requestor. Proposed purposes for using the shared data include replication studies, meta-analyses or systematic reviews, and other special requests. Researchers wanting to use data from this study should direct their requests to tkesar@emory.edu. To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Locations