Efficacy of Liberal Versus Restricted IV Fluid Approach in the Management of Sickle Cell Vaso-Occlusive Crisis
FLASC
Fluid Management in Sickle Cell Disease Vaso-occlusive Crisis: Restrictive Versus Liberal Strategies: A Randomized Controlled Trial (FLASC Trial)
1 other identifier
interventional
394
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a prevalent inherited blood disorder characterized by vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), which lead to severe pain and complications. Despite hydration being a cornerstone of VOC management, the optimal fluid strategy remains uncertain. This study evaluates restrictive versus liberal fluid management strategies in patients with acute VOC. This multi-center, open-label, non-inferiority RCT will enroll patients with SCD presenting with acute VOC. Participants will be randomized to either a restrictive or liberal intravenous fluid management protocol. Primary outcome is pain score reduction. Secondary outcomes include time to pain resolution, ED length of stay, hospital admission rate, cumulative opioid dose, adverse events (incidence of fluid overload, pulmonary congestion), acute chest syndrome, incidence of acute kidney injury, revisit rates within 72 hours of ED discharge, need for intensive care or high-dependency unit admission, need for additional interventions, and 28 days overall mortality. Data will be analyzed using intention-to-treat principles. We hypothesize that a restrictive fluid strategy will achieve non-inferior pain control compared to a liberal strategy, while minimizing fluid-related complications. This study will provide evidence to inform clinical guidelines for fluid management in SCD patients experiencing VOCs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 23, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 5, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2028
March 18, 2026
March 1, 2026
2.8 years
August 11, 2025
March 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Pain intensity
Measured using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)
Baseline (within 30 minutes post admission), 1 hour, then hourly until ED discharge or 24- 48- and 72-hours post-admission ( for admitted patients)
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Time to pain resolution
up to 4 hours
ED length of stay
at least 4 hours
Hospital admission rate
within 24 hours of ED admission
Cumulative Opioid Dose
up to 4 hours
Revisit Rates
within 72 hours post ED discharge
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Restricted approach group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this arm will receive maintenance intravenous fluids at a keep-vein-open (KVO) rate and no extra intravenous fluids is administered
Liberal Approach Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients will receive an IV bolus of 20 mL/kg of normal saline or lactated Ringer's over 1 hour, followed by maintenance fluids at 1.5-2 ml/kg times the calculated daily maintenance requirements
Interventions
Keep vein open rate
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients \>18 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of SCD.
- Presenting with a VOC.
- NPRS \>5
- Willingness to participate and provide informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Patient requiring specialized IVF management as per the treating physician discretion.
- Patients with congestive heart failure, and /or acute or chronic symptomatic systolic heart failure
- Patients with ESRD on chronic dialysis
- Patients with signs of shock (low SBP \<100 or MAP \< 65) and signs of hypo perfusion
- Known or suspected pregnancy
- Previously enrolled in this trial within the last 30 days
- Enrolled in another trial study that interfered with fluid management
- Unable to obtain IV access.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
King Fahd Hospital of the University
Dammam, Eastern Province, 31952, Saudi Arabia
King Saud University Medical City
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Related Publications (6)
Puri L, Nottage KA, Hankins JS, Anghelescu DL. State of the Art Management of Acute Vaso-occlusive Pain in Sickle Cell Disease. Paediatr Drugs. 2018 Feb;20(1):29-42. doi: 10.1007/s40272-017-0263-z.
PMID: 28853040BACKGROUNDRizio AA, Bhor M, Lin X, McCausland KL, White MK, Paulose J, Nandal S, Halloway RI, Bronte-Hall L. The relationship between frequency and severity of vaso-occlusive crises and health-related quality of life and work productivity in adults with sickle cell disease. Qual Life Res. 2020 Jun;29(6):1533-1547. doi: 10.1007/s11136-019-02412-5. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
PMID: 31933113BACKGROUNDOkomo U, Meremikwu MM. Fluid replacement therapy for acute episodes of pain in people with sickle cell disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 12;(3):CD005406. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005406.pub4.
PMID: 25764071BACKGROUNDBrandow AM, Carroll CP, Creary S, Edwards-Elliott R, Glassberg J, Hurley RW, Kutlar A, Seisa M, Stinson J, Strouse JJ, Yusuf F, Zempsky W, Lang E. American Society of Hematology 2020 guidelines for sickle cell disease: management of acute and chronic pain. Blood Adv. 2020 Jun 23;4(12):2656-2701. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2020001851.
PMID: 32559294BACKGROUNDRosa RM, Bierer BE, Thomas R, Stoff JS, Kruskall M, Robinson S, Bunn HF, Epstein FH. A study of induced hyponatremia in the prevention and treatment of sickle-cell crisis. N Engl J Med. 1980 Nov 13;303(20):1138-43. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198011133032002.
PMID: 6999348BACKGROUNDGBD 2021 Sickle Cell Disease Collaborators. Global, regional, and national prevalence and mortality burden of sickle cell disease, 2000-2021: a systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet Haematol. 2023 Aug;10(8):e585-e599. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(23)00118-7. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
PMID: 37331373BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mohammed S Alshahrani, MD
King Fahd Hospital of the University- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Consultant, Emergency and Critical Care Departments
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 11, 2025
First Posted
September 23, 2025
Study Start
October 5, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
October 1, 2028
Last Updated
March 18, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
1. Demographics: Age, sex, and other baseline characteristics. 2. Outcome Measures: primary and secondary outcomes of the trial. 3. Adverse Events: Data on side effects or other adverse events participants experienced during the trial. 4. Treatment Allocations: Information on which participants were assigned to each treatment group.