The Test-retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Figure of Eight Walk Test and the 360° Turn Test
Beyond Straight Lines: The Test-retest Reliability and Concurrent Validity of the Figure of Eight Walk Test and the 360° Turn Test in Patients With Total Hip Arthroplasty
1 other identifier
observational
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are no existing studies that have evaluated the reliability and validity of the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test (F8WT) and the 360° Turn Test (360°TT) specifically in patients with total hip arthroplasty (PwTHA). The objective of this investigation was to assess the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the F8WT and 360°TT within this patient population.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 20, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 22, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2025
CompletedMarch 17, 2026
March 1, 2026
3 months
September 15, 2025
March 14, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Figure of eight walk test (F8WT)
The F8WT was developed to evaluate parameters such as gait speed, balance, and directional turning capabilities. The protocol involves participants walking in a figure-eight pattern around two cones positioned 1.52 meters apart. Timing commences when participants initiate the task from the midpoint of the figure-eight trajectory and concludes upon their return to the starting location. Participants' walking directions and chosen speeds are adjusted according to individual preferences and comfort levels.
Baseline
Figure of eight walk test (F8WT)
The F8WT was developed to evaluate parameters such as gait speed, balance, and directional turning capabilities. The protocol involves participants walking in a figure-eight pattern around two cones positioned 1.52 meters apart. Timing commences when participants initiate the task from the midpoint of the figure-eight trajectory and concludes upon their return to the starting location. Participants' walking directions and chosen speeds are adjusted according to individual preferences and comfort levels.
1 hour after baseline
360° turn test (360°TT)
The 360°TT serves as a performance evaluation tool aimed at assessing dynamic balance capabilities. The protocol requires participants to execute a complete 360° turn in the shortest possible duration. Turn time and the number of steps employed during the maneuver are recorded using a stopwatch. A turn duration exceeding 2.1 seconds is indicative of a heightened risk of balance deterioration and potential functional impairment.
Baseline
360° turn test (360°TT)
The 360°TT serves as a performance evaluation tool aimed at assessing dynamic balance capabilities. The protocol requires participants to execute a complete 360° turn in the shortest possible duration. Turn time and the number of steps employed during the maneuver are recorded using a stopwatch. A turn duration exceeding 2.1 seconds is indicative of a heightened risk of balance deterioration and potential functional impairment.
1 hour after baseline
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Timed up and go test (TUG)
Baseline
Harris hip score (HHS)
Baseline
Study Arms (1)
Patients with Total Hip Arthroplasty
Participants who have undergone total hip arthroplasty and are enrolled to evaluate the reliability and validity of performance-based outcome measures.
Eligibility Criteria
Participants who have undergone total hip arthroplasty and are enrolled to evaluate the reliability and validity of performance-based outcome measures.
You may qualify if:
- surgery performed at least 6 months prior;
- unilateral total hip arthroplasty;
- patients who scored at least 24 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).
You may not qualify if:
- a history of additional surgery on the lower extremities;
- bilateral THA or revision surgery;
- severe neurological or orthopedic conditions that may influence musculoskeletal mobility or walking;
- body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² or higher;
- lack of consent to participate in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın
Artvin, 08000, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (13)
Bahl JS, Nelson MJ, Taylor M, Solomon LB, Arnold JB, Thewlis D. Biomechanical changes and recovery of gait function after total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jul;26(7):847-863. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.897. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
PMID: 29474993BACKGROUNDYarar HA, Narin S, Erduran M, Gurbanov I. The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 360 degrees turn test in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Somatosens Mot Res. 2024 Jun;41(2):90-96. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2178402. Epub 2023 Feb 14.
PMID: 36786842BACKGROUNDBarker KL, Batting M, Schlussel M, Newman M. The reliability and validity of the Figure of 8 Walk test in older people with knee replacement: does the setting have an impact? Physiotherapy. 2019 Mar;105(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
PMID: 30241701BACKGROUNDTillman M, Molino J, Zaferiou AM. Frontal plane balance during pre-planned and late-cued 90 degree turns while walking. J Biomech. 2022 Aug;141:111206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111206. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
PMID: 35772242BACKGROUNDAlmajid R, Goel R, Tucker C, Keshner E. Balance confidence and turning behavior as a measure of fall risk. Gait Posture. 2020 Jul;80:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 20.
PMID: 32454377BACKGROUNDMokkink LB, Elsman EBM, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0. Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2929-2939. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03761-6. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
PMID: 39198348BACKGROUNDFolstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.
PMID: 1202204BACKGROUNDOzden F, Ozkeskin M, Ar E, Yuceyar N. Gait assessment in shaped pathways: The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the figure of eight test and L test in multiple sclerosis patients without mobility aids. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103998. Epub 2022 Jun 25.
PMID: 35777291BACKGROUNDDobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Marshall CJ, Sayer T, Anderson C, Newcomb N, Stratford PW, Bennell KL. Reliability and measurement error of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommended performance-based tests of physical function in people with hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Nov;25(11):1792-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
PMID: 28647467BACKGROUNDRamadanov N, Voss M, Hable R, Hakam HT, Prill R, Salzmann M, Dimitrov D, Becker R. Postoperative Harris Hip Score Versus Harris Hip Score Difference in Hip Replacement: What to Report? Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan;17(1):3-21. doi: 10.1111/os.14272. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
PMID: 39434235BACKGROUNDCelik D, Can C, Aslan Y, Ceylan HH, Bilsel K, Ozdincler AR. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Harris Hip Score. Hip Int. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):473-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000146. Epub 2014 Sep 10.
PMID: 25264204BACKGROUNDPittenger DJ. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research. Ethics Behav. 2003;13(1):45-60. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1301_08.
PMID: 14552304BACKGROUNDGandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Syed KA, Mahomed NN. Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population. Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;28(3):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1021-y. Epub 2008 Oct 8.
PMID: 18853222BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın, Dr.
Artvin Coruh University
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- OTHER
- Time Perspective
- CROSS SECTIONAL
- Target Duration
- 3 Months
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 15, 2025
First Posted
September 22, 2025
Study Start
September 20, 2025
Primary Completion
December 30, 2025
Study Completion
December 30, 2025
Last Updated
March 17, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share