NCT07186400

Brief Summary

To the best of the authors' knowledge, there are no existing studies that have evaluated the reliability and validity of the Figure-of-Eight Walk Test (F8WT) and the 360° Turn Test (360°TT) specifically in patients with total hip arthroplasty (PwTHA). The objective of this investigation was to assess the test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the F8WT and 360°TT within this patient population.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
54

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 15, 2025

Completed
5 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 20, 2025

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 22, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 30, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

March 17, 2026

Status Verified

March 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 15, 2025

Last Update Submit

March 14, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

total hip arthroplastytest-retest reliabilityvaliditybalance

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Figure of eight walk test (F8WT)

    The F8WT was developed to evaluate parameters such as gait speed, balance, and directional turning capabilities. The protocol involves participants walking in a figure-eight pattern around two cones positioned 1.52 meters apart. Timing commences when participants initiate the task from the midpoint of the figure-eight trajectory and concludes upon their return to the starting location. Participants' walking directions and chosen speeds are adjusted according to individual preferences and comfort levels.

    Baseline

  • Figure of eight walk test (F8WT)

    The F8WT was developed to evaluate parameters such as gait speed, balance, and directional turning capabilities. The protocol involves participants walking in a figure-eight pattern around two cones positioned 1.52 meters apart. Timing commences when participants initiate the task from the midpoint of the figure-eight trajectory and concludes upon their return to the starting location. Participants' walking directions and chosen speeds are adjusted according to individual preferences and comfort levels.

    1 hour after baseline

  • 360° turn test (360°TT)

    The 360°TT serves as a performance evaluation tool aimed at assessing dynamic balance capabilities. The protocol requires participants to execute a complete 360° turn in the shortest possible duration. Turn time and the number of steps employed during the maneuver are recorded using a stopwatch. A turn duration exceeding 2.1 seconds is indicative of a heightened risk of balance deterioration and potential functional impairment.

    Baseline

  • 360° turn test (360°TT)

    The 360°TT serves as a performance evaluation tool aimed at assessing dynamic balance capabilities. The protocol requires participants to execute a complete 360° turn in the shortest possible duration. Turn time and the number of steps employed during the maneuver are recorded using a stopwatch. A turn duration exceeding 2.1 seconds is indicative of a heightened risk of balance deterioration and potential functional impairment.

    1 hour after baseline

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Timed up and go test (TUG)

    Baseline

  • Harris hip score (HHS)

    Baseline

Study Arms (1)

Patients with Total Hip Arthroplasty

Participants who have undergone total hip arthroplasty and are enrolled to evaluate the reliability and validity of performance-based outcome measures.

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Participants who have undergone total hip arthroplasty and are enrolled to evaluate the reliability and validity of performance-based outcome measures.

You may qualify if:

  • surgery performed at least 6 months prior;
  • unilateral total hip arthroplasty;
  • patients who scored at least 24 points on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

You may not qualify if:

  • a history of additional surgery on the lower extremities;
  • bilateral THA or revision surgery;
  • severe neurological or orthopedic conditions that may influence musculoskeletal mobility or walking;
  • body mass index (BMI) of 40 kg/m² or higher;
  • lack of consent to participate in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın

Artvin, 08000, Turkey (Türkiye)

Location

Related Publications (13)

  • Bahl JS, Nelson MJ, Taylor M, Solomon LB, Arnold JB, Thewlis D. Biomechanical changes and recovery of gait function after total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2018 Jul;26(7):847-863. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.897. Epub 2018 Feb 21.

    PMID: 29474993BACKGROUND
  • Yarar HA, Narin S, Erduran M, Gurbanov I. The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of 360 degrees turn test in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Somatosens Mot Res. 2024 Jun;41(2):90-96. doi: 10.1080/08990220.2023.2178402. Epub 2023 Feb 14.

    PMID: 36786842BACKGROUND
  • Barker KL, Batting M, Schlussel M, Newman M. The reliability and validity of the Figure of 8 Walk test in older people with knee replacement: does the setting have an impact? Physiotherapy. 2019 Mar;105(1):76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2018.07.003. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

    PMID: 30241701BACKGROUND
  • Tillman M, Molino J, Zaferiou AM. Frontal plane balance during pre-planned and late-cued 90 degree turns while walking. J Biomech. 2022 Aug;141:111206. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2022.111206. Epub 2022 Jun 20.

    PMID: 35772242BACKGROUND
  • Almajid R, Goel R, Tucker C, Keshner E. Balance confidence and turning behavior as a measure of fall risk. Gait Posture. 2020 Jul;80:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.05.020. Epub 2020 May 20.

    PMID: 32454377BACKGROUND
  • Mokkink LB, Elsman EBM, Terwee CB. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures version 2.0. Qual Life Res. 2024 Nov;33(11):2929-2939. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03761-6. Epub 2024 Aug 28.

    PMID: 39198348BACKGROUND
  • Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975 Nov;12(3):189-98. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6. No abstract available.

    PMID: 1202204BACKGROUND
  • Ozden F, Ozkeskin M, Ar E, Yuceyar N. Gait assessment in shaped pathways: The test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the figure of eight test and L test in multiple sclerosis patients without mobility aids. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2022 Sep;65:103998. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103998. Epub 2022 Jun 25.

    PMID: 35777291BACKGROUND
  • Dobson F, Hinman RS, Hall M, Marshall CJ, Sayer T, Anderson C, Newcomb N, Stratford PW, Bennell KL. Reliability and measurement error of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI) recommended performance-based tests of physical function in people with hip and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2017 Nov;25(11):1792-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.06.006. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

    PMID: 28647467BACKGROUND
  • Ramadanov N, Voss M, Hable R, Hakam HT, Prill R, Salzmann M, Dimitrov D, Becker R. Postoperative Harris Hip Score Versus Harris Hip Score Difference in Hip Replacement: What to Report? Orthop Surg. 2025 Jan;17(1):3-21. doi: 10.1111/os.14272. Epub 2024 Oct 21.

    PMID: 39434235BACKGROUND
  • Celik D, Can C, Aslan Y, Ceylan HH, Bilsel K, Ozdincler AR. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Turkish version of the Harris Hip Score. Hip Int. 2014 Sep-Oct;24(5):473-9. doi: 10.5301/hipint.5000146. Epub 2014 Sep 10.

    PMID: 25264204BACKGROUND
  • Pittenger DJ. Internet research: an opportunity to revisit classic ethical problems in behavioral research. Ethics Behav. 2003;13(1):45-60. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1301_08.

    PMID: 14552304BACKGROUND
  • Gandhi R, Tsvetkov D, Davey JR, Syed KA, Mahomed NN. Relationship between self-reported and performance-based tests in a hip and knee joint replacement population. Clin Rheumatol. 2009 Mar;28(3):253-7. doi: 10.1007/s10067-008-1021-y. Epub 2008 Oct 8.

    PMID: 18853222BACKGROUND

Study Officials

  • Zeynep Yıldız Kızkın, Dr.

    Artvin Coruh University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
OTHER
Time Perspective
CROSS SECTIONAL
Target Duration
3 Months
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2025

First Posted

September 22, 2025

Study Start

September 20, 2025

Primary Completion

December 30, 2025

Study Completion

December 30, 2025

Last Updated

March 17, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations