NCT07183904

Brief Summary

Distal radius fractures, commonly known as wrist fractures, are among the most frequent injuries seen in emergency departments. These injuries often require a closed reduction, a procedure in which the broken bone is manipulated back into place without surgery. One of the main challenges during this procedure is providing adequate pain control. Traditionally, many hospitals use a "hematoma block," which means injecting a local anesthetic directly into the site of the fracture. This technique is simple and generally safe, but it does not always provide enough pain relief. Some patients continue to experience significant discomfort, especially in the fingers, during the traction and manipulation required to realign the bone. Another option is to block the median nerve at the wrist. The median nerve supplies sensation to the thumb, index, and middle fingers. When combined with a hematoma block, this technique may improve digital pain relief during fracture reduction. However, this combined approach has not been well studied in Spain, and there is limited high-quality evidence worldwide. The purpose of this study is to compare two methods of pain control during closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures in adults: Hematoma block alone versus Hematoma block combined with median nerve block. We hypothesize that the combined approach will reduce pain more effectively than the hematoma block alone. The study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial involving 112 adult patients treated at two hospitals in Madrid (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Hospital Universitario de Getafe). Eligible participants are adults aged 18 to 100 years with an acute distal radius fracture (less than 48 hours old) requiring closed reduction. Patients will be randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Pain will be assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at three key moments: during finger traction, during the reduction itself, and at hospital discharge (90-120 minutes after casting). Other information such as age, sex, fracture side, and prior use of pain or psychiatric medication will also be collected. By answering whether the addition of a median nerve block improves pain control, this study could help establish a new protocol for managing distal radius fractures. If effective, this approach may lead to greater comfort for patients, higher satisfaction, and better overall outcomes in emergency care.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
180

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2024

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2024

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 17, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 5, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 13, 2025

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 19, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

September 13, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 13, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Distal Radius FractureHematoma BlockMedian Nerve BlockPain ManagementClosed Reduction

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain Intensity During Closed Reduction

    Pain will be measured using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain). Scores will be recorded at the wrist and fingers during traction, manipulation, and at discharge.

    During fracture reduction procedure and at hospital discharge (90-120 minutes post-casting).

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Demographic and Baseline Characteristics

    At enrollment (baseline).

  • Incidence of Adverse Events Related to Anesthetic Techniques

    From intervention until hospital discharge (90-120 minutes post-casting).

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Radiographic Quality of Reduction

    Immediately after closed reduction and casting.

Study Arms (2)

Hematoma Block

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants will receive a hematoma block only. Under aseptic conditions, 5-10 mL of 2% mepivacaine will be injected directly into the fracture hematoma using a 25-27 gauge needle. No additional nerve block will be performed. This technique is currently the standard of care in the Emergency Department for closed reduction of displaced distal radius fractures.

Procedure: Hematoma Block

Hematoma Block + Median Nerve Block

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants will receive both a hematoma block and a median nerve block. Median nerve block will be administered at the wrist using anatomical landmarks: 3-5 mL of 2% mepivacaine injected between palmaris longus and flexor carpi radialis.

Procedure: Hematoma BlockProcedure: Median Nerve Block

Interventions

Injection of 5-10 mL of 2% mepivacaine directly into the fracture hematoma under aseptic conditions.

Hematoma BlockHematoma Block + Median Nerve Block

Injection of 3-5 mL of 2% mepivacaine adjacent to the median nerve at the wrist, using anatomical landmarks.

Hematoma Block + Median Nerve Block

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Adults aged 18 to 100 years.
  • Diagnosis of acute displaced distal radius fracture (\< 48 hours since injury).
  • Indication for closed reduction and immobilization.
  • Ability to provide informed consent.

You may not qualify if:

  • Age under 18 years or open physes on plain radiograph.
  • Open or pathological distal radius fractures.
  • Local infection at or near the planned injection site.
  • Significant neurological disease or cognitive impairment interfering with study participation.
  • Presence of osteosynthesis material in the same segment of the affected limb.
  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics used in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

12 de Octubre University Hospital

Madrid, Madrid, 28041, Spain

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Wrist FracturesAgnosia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Wrist InjuriesArm InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, BonePerceptual DisordersNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: * Two-arm design with participants randomized 1:1. * One group receives hematoma block alone (control). * The other group receives hematoma block combined with median nerve block (intervention). * Randomization is stratified by study center (Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre and Hospital Universitario de Getafe) and balanced for sex, age, fracture side, and prior medication use. * Each participant is assigned to only one study arm and followed prospectively.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr. (Orthopaedic Surgeon)

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 13, 2025

First Posted

September 19, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2024

Primary Completion

January 17, 2025

Study Completion

March 5, 2025

Last Updated

September 19, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

De-identified individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial that underlie the primary and secondary outcomes will be shared. This includes pain scores (VAS values), demographic information (age, sex, fracture side, prior medication use), and adverse event data. No information that could directly identify a participant (e.g., names, dates of birth, hospital ID numbers) will be included. Requests should be directed to the Principal Investigator (jaguerrero14@hotmail.com)

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
IPD Sharing Start Date: Approximately 6 months after publication of the primary study results (end-2026). IPD Sharing End Date: Data will be available for 5 years after publication (end-2031).
Access Criteria
Who will be able to access the IPD and supporting information: Qualified researchers with a methodologically sound proposal will be able to access the data. Access will be considered for investigators affiliated with academic institutions or healthcare organizations who intend to use the data for research aligned with the aims of this study. What they will be able to access: De-identified individual participant data underlying the primary and secondary outcomes (VAS pain scores, demographics, adverse event data), as well as the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and data dictionary. How they will be able to access it: Researchers may request access by contacting the Principal Investigator. Following approval of the proposal by the study investigators, the dataset and supporting documents will be transferred using secure, encrypted methods to protect confidentiality.

Locations