Impact of Blood Cultures Drawn From Arterial Lines on the Incidence of Contamination, Detection of Bacteremia, and Blood Culture Volume
1 other identifier
observational
1,500
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Taking blood cultures is an important and very common procedure in intensive care units due to the high incidence of sepsis and the need for rapid and accurate identification of bacteremia. However, despite the importance of taking a sufficient volume of blood for the purpose of identifying bacterial growth in the blood, the average blood volume in blood cultures at our institution ranges from 3.5-4 ml per bottle (where the desired volume is 10 ml). Taking an insufficient amount of blood reduces the ability of the bacteriological laboratory to detect bacterial growth and thus may lead to a delay or missed diagnosis of bacteremia, identification of the pathogen, and adjustment of appropriate treatment according to sensitivities. In intensive care units, most patients are monitored using an arterial catheter, which allows for frequent blood tests without the need to puncture the patient. Following recently published studies that showed that there is no significant difference in the incidence of contamination when taking blood cultures from an arterial catheter compared to a peripheral vein puncture, and in order to improve our ability to identify bacteremia, it was decided to implement a new protocol in the General Intensive Care Unit that includes taking blood cultures from an arterial catheter. According to the new protocol, it was decided that when taking blood cultures from a patient with an arterial catheter, one pair of cultures should be taken from the arterial catheter and another pair from a peripheral vein puncture. In this study, we would like to examine the contamination rate of blood cultures, the identification of true bacteremia, and the collection of appropriate blood volume and number of blood specimens taken in patients hospitalized in the General Intensive Care Unit at our institution, while analyzing differences between the period before the implementation of the new protocol and the period after the implementation, and differences between cultures taken from an arterial catheter and from a peripheral vein puncture.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jan 2026
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 19, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2026
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2028
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
September 19, 2025
September 1, 2025
2 years
September 14, 2025
September 14, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Contamination and real bacteremia detection rates
To examine whether there are differences between the contamination rate and the detection rate of true bacteremia between blood cultures from an arterial catheter and blood cultures from a fresh puncture of a peripheral vein.
One week following blood cultures collection
Study Arms (2)
Cultures from arterial line
From each patient enrolled in the study, two sets of blood cultures will be drawn: one set (2 bottles) from an arterial line and one set from peripheral venous puncture. Each patient will be both the study and the control group for himself: The comparison will be between the arterial line vs. the peripheral vein puncture set. In addition, we will also perform a before and after intervention analysis- to examine whether the implementation of the new protocol improved the rate of appropriate blood culture volume and number of culture drawn from the patient .
Cultures from peripheral venous puncture
From each patient enrolled in the study, two sets of blood cultures will be drawn: one set (2 bottles) from an arterial line and one set from peripheral venous puncture. Each patient will be both the study and the control group for himself: The comparison will be between the arterial line vs. the peripheral vein puncture set. In addition, we will also perform a before and after intervention analysis- to examine whether the implementation of the new protocol improved the rate of appropriate blood culture volume and number of culture drawn from the patient .
Interventions
Blood culture taken from an arterial catheter (instead of peripheral venous puncture)
Eligibility Criteria
All patients admitted to the intensive care unit in our hospital between January 2024 and January 2027 who had blood cultures taken as part of their routine care.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, Israel
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 14, 2025
First Posted
September 19, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
January 1, 2028
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
September 19, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09