Warm-Up Effects on Adolescent Goalkeepers' Performance
Acute Effects of Different Warm-Up Protocols on Motor Performance in Adolescent Football Goalkeepers: A Randomised Crossover Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
15
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the acute effects of different warm-up protocols on performance outcomes in adolescent male football goalkeepers. Specifically, it investigates the impact of aerobic running, static stretching, dynamic stretching, and movement preparation on flexibility, explosive power, and dynamic balance.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2024
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 10, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2024
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 2, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 18, 2025
CompletedSeptember 18, 2025
September 1, 2025
9 days
September 2, 2025
September 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Flexibility (Sit and Reach)
Flexibility of the posterior chain was assessed using the sit-and-reach test with a standardized measurement box. Participants performed three trials barefoot with knees fully extended, and the best score was recorded in centimeters.
Immediately post-intervention, after each warm-up session (4 sessions, separated by at least 48 hours).
Explosive Lower-Limb Power (Standing Long Jump)
Explosive horizontal power was measured by the standing long jump test. From a standing position, participants jumped bilaterally as far as possible. The distance was measured to the nearest cm from the starting line to the rearmost heel. Three maximal trials were performed with 2 minutes rest, and the best score was used.
Immediately post-intervention, after each warm-up session (4 sessions, separated by at least 48 hours).
Dynamic Balance (Y Balance Test normalized composite score)
Dynamic postural control was assessed using the Y Balance Test. Reach distances in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions were normalized to leg length. A composite score (mean of three directions) was calculated and used for analysis.
Immediately post-intervention, after each warm-up session (4 sessions, separated by at least 48 hours).
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Anthropometric Parameters (Height, Weight, BMI)
Baseline (Day 1, prior to the first warm-up intervention session)
Internal Load (Heart Rate Monitoring)
During each warm-up session (15 minutes, across AR, SS, DS, MP protocols)
Study Arms (4)
Arm 1: Aerobic Running Warm-Up (AR)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform a 15-minute aerobic running protocol with heart rate maintained at 60-75% of age-predicted maximum (HRₘₐₓ). Includes 7 minutes of light jogging followed by slight intensity increase.
Arm 2: Static Stretching Warm-Up (SS)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform 5 minutes of light jogging, followed by static stretches of six lower-limb muscle groups (gastrocnemius, quadriceps, hamstrings, hip flexors, adductors, gluteals). Each muscle stretched twice for 30 seconds. Finishes with 3-4 minutes of light dynamic movements.
Arm 3: Dynamic Stretching Warm-Up (DS)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform 5 minutes of light jogging, followed by dynamic stretches targeting the same six lower-limb muscle groups over 10-15 meters with short rest between repetitions.
Arm 4: Movement Preparation Warm-Up (MP)
EXPERIMENTALParticipants perform a combination of light jogging, multi-joint mobility drills (e.g., lateral shuffles, inchworms), submaximal sprinting (80-90% maximum velocity), and low-intensity balance drills adapted from FIFA 11+ and HarmoKnee.
Interventions
15-minute aerobic running protocol. Heart rate maintained at 60-75% of age-predicted maximum (HRₘₐₓ). Includes 7 minutes light jogging followed by slight intensity increase.
5 minutes light jogging followed by static stretches of six lower-limb muscles (gastrocnemius, quadriceps, hamstrings, hip flexors, adductors, gluteals). Each muscle stretched twice for 30 seconds, finishing with 3-4 minutes of light dynamic movements.
5 minutes light jogging followed by dynamic stretches targeting the same six muscle groups over 10-15 meters with brief rest between repetitions.
Description: Combination of light jogging, multi-joint mobility drills (e.g., lateral shuffles, inchworms), submaximal sprinting (80-90% max velocity), and low-intensity balance drills adapted from FIFA 11+ and HarmoKnee.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Biologically male football goalkeepers
- Aged 14-15 years
- Actively competing in youth leagues
- Minimum training experience of approximately 3-4 years
- Free from chronic diseases or musculoskeletal injuries that could affect physical performance
- Maintain regular sleep and dietary routines during the study period
You may not qualify if:
- Current injuries
- Chronic health conditions
- Any physical limitations that could interfere with safe participation in warm-up protocols or performance testing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Uşak Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Uşak University
Uşak, 64200, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mustafa AKIL, Professor Dr.
Uşak University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Melek G. GUNGOR
Uşak University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mehmet Emin Yelken, Ph.D.
Ilgaz Provincial Directorate of Youth and Sports
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- No additional parties are masked in this study. Only the outcome assessors are blinded to the warm-up protocol.
- Purpose
- BASIC SCIENCE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Instructor of Physical Education and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Ph.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 2, 2025
First Posted
September 18, 2025
Study Start
March 1, 2024
Primary Completion
March 10, 2024
Study Completion
April 1, 2024
Last Updated
September 18, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09