NCT07176091

Brief Summary

TMS regulates cortical excitability through electromagnetic induction, with low-frequency stimulation suppressing and high-frequency stimulation enhancing excitability. Building on theta-gamma coupling, iTBS induces broader improvements in functional brain connectivity within a shorter stimulation period, particularly by significantly reducing abnormal variability in the prefrontal and parietal regions, demonstrating superior neuromodulatory efficiency and network remodeling capacity. This study aims to compare the symptomatic effects of different iTBS protocols on Parkinson's disease, optimize stimulation parameters, and evaluate safety, while also analyzing the time-dependent trends of therapeutic efficacy through 1- and 3-month follow-ups.

Trial Health

75
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
13mo left

Started Jan 2025

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
enrolling by invitation

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress53%
Jan 2025Jun 2027

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2025

Completed
7 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 10, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 16, 2025

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2027

Expected
3 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

2.2 years

First QC Date

August 10, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 11, 2026

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Assessment with the KPPS

    King's PD Pain Scale (KPPS) includes 14 items rating the severity and frequency of pain, each item scored by severity (0-3) multiplied by frequency (0-4), resulting in a subscore of 0 to 12, with a total possible score range from 0 to 168. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severities and more serious influence.

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • Assessment with the MKPPS

    Modified King's PD Pain Scale (MKPPS),the modified version which is more suitable for Chinese people, combined with Ford's pain subtypes basing on the original. It covers five main domains, including 16 items, each item scored by severity (0-3) multiplied by frequency (0-4), resulting in a total possible score range from 0 to 192. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severities and more serious influence.

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • Change in Pain Intensity Scores (VAS)

    VAS, a 0-10 numeric rating scale with 0= no pain and 10=maximal pain. Higher scores indicate greater symptom severities and more serious influence.

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Changes in MDS-UPDRS I

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • Change in MDS-UPDRS II

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • Change in MDS-UPDRS III

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • Changes in PD Depression Score

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • Changes in PD Anxiety Score

    at baseline, on day 1 after treatment, and at 1 month and 3 months after treatment

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

High-dose iTBS treatment group

EXPERIMENTAL

High-dose iTBS, 5 sessions per day for 5 consecutive days.

Procedure: High-dose iTBS treatment group

Low-dose iTBS treatment group

EXPERIMENTAL

Conventional-dose iTBS, once daily for 5 consecutive days.

Procedure: Low-dose iTBS treatment group

Sham stimulation group

SHAM COMPARATOR

Administer sham stimulation

Procedure: Sham stimulation group

Interventions

The stimulation intensity is 80% of the resting motor threshold (RMT), with an intra-burst frequency of 50 Hz and an inter-burst frequency of 5 Hz. Each train lasts 2 seconds, followed by an 8-second inter-train interval, delivering 1,800 pulses per session. The session is repeated after a 30-minute interval, with a total of 5 sessions per day (amounting to 9,000 pulses daily). Stimulation is administered for 5 consecutive days, resulting in a total of 45,000 pulses.

Also known as: The group treated with tDCS, The group treated with rTMS
High-dose iTBS treatment group

The stimulation intensity is 80% of the resting motor threshold (RMT), with an intra-burst frequency of 50 Hz and an inter-burst frequency of 5 Hz. Each train lasts 2 seconds, followed by an 8-second inter-train interval, delivering 1,800 pulses per session. Stimulation is administered once daily (1,800 pulses per day) for 5 consecutive days, resulting in a total of 9,000 pulses.

Low-dose iTBS treatment group

The intervention procedure is identical to that of active stimulation, with the sole difference being the use of a specific sham coil. This sham coil has the same appearance as the active coil but is specially modified to produce no magnetic field, generating only vibration and sound.

Sham stimulation group

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged 40-80 years; ② Diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease meeting the MDS Clinical Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinson's disease (2015 edition), with a disease duration of at least 3 years and Hoehn \& Yahr stage \< 4;
  • Stable use of anti-parkinsonian medication for 2 weeks prior to the study and throughout the entire study period, with no dosage adjustments; ④ Concurrently meeting the diagnostic criteria for Parkinson's disease-related pain, with a frequency of at least 3 times per week and duration of at least 3 months; Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score ≥ 3; ⑤ Passing the TMS Safety Screening Questionnaire (TSSQ);

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with other diseases that may affect peripheral nerve sensation, including but not limited to diabetes, herpes infection, stroke, or spinal cord disorders;
  • Patients with comorbid severe depression or psychiatric disorders;
  • Presence of severe cognitive impairment, defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≤ 9;
  • Patients with concurrent intracranial organic lesions or a history of traumatic brain injury; ⑤ Patients with severe organic diseases involving the heart, liver, kidneys, or other vital organs; ⑥ Patients unable to undergo cranial MRI examination or TMS treatment due to claustrophobia, presence of implanted devices such as pacemakers, history of epilepsy, or other contraindications.
  • Providing written informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

Suzhou, Jiangsu, 215000, China

Location

Related Publications (4)

  • Liu S, Yang S, Wang C, Li J, Wang L. Effects of two types of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on brain network in Parkinson's disease. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2025 Jul 1;11(1):191. doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01054-4.

    PMID: 40593930BACKGROUND
  • Huang YZ, Edwards MJ, Rounis E, Bhatia KP, Rothwell JC. Theta burst stimulation of the human motor cortex. Neuron. 2005 Jan 20;45(2):201-6. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.033.

    PMID: 15664172BACKGROUND
  • Galanis C, Hananeia N, Lenz M, Vasheghani Farahani M, Jedlicka P, Vlachos A. Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces plasticity of excitatory synapses through cooperative pre- and postsynaptic activity. Brain Stimul. 2025 Sep-Oct;18(5):1641-1650. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2025.08.019. Epub 2025 Aug 23.

    PMID: 40850522BACKGROUND
  • Armstrong MJ, Okun MS. Diagnosis and Treatment of Parkinson Disease: A Review. JAMA. 2020 Feb 11;323(6):548-560. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.22360.

    PMID: 32044947BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Parkinsonian Disorders

Interventions

Transcranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Basal Ganglia DiseasesBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesMovement Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Electric Stimulation TherapyTherapeuticsConvulsive TherapyPsychiatric Somatic TherapiesBehavioral Disciplines and ActivitiesElectroshockPsychological TechniquesMagnetic Field Therapy

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The figure-of-eight coils used for active or sham stimulation are similar, including the emitted sound and the scalp tapping sensation.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Patients will be randomised into three groups-high-dose iTBS, low-dose iTBS, and sham stimulation-at a 1:1:1 ratio.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Associate Professor

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2025

First Posted

September 16, 2025

Study Start

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Last Updated

February 13, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations