The Spiral MRI Study
MRI Technology for Greater Efficiency and Improved Value
5 other identifiers
interventional
131
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The goal of this clinical trial is to find out if new Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) computer software will:
- help make scans and exams faster
- reduce artifacts
- make MRI easier to understand
- allow technicians to focus more on the participant and less on the scanner Participants will complete one brain MRI imaging session, lasting about 60 minutes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2028
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 3, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2028
ExpectedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2031
Study Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2031
September 17, 2025
September 1, 2025
2.7 years
September 3, 2025
September 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Image quality - decreasing scan time
Participants will be scanned using 2 versions (standard and spiral) of 6 sequences (12 scans total). For each sequence pair, scan time will be sped up. Image quality will be compared between the 2 versions.
60 minutes
Image quality - tau
Measuring whether image quality is sufficient for routine diagnostic interpretation - specifically robustness to artifacts. The independent variable is a scanning parameter called tau, which researchers want to be long (because it makes the total scan time shorter). Researchers will compare the value of tau between SOC imaging and spiral. They will use a 5-point Likert scale to compare, where 1= undiagnostic (unacceptable), 2 = spiral scans slightly worse than SOC but acceptable, 3= spiral scans same as SOC (acceptable), 4= spiral scans slightly better than SOC (acceptable), 5=spiral scans much better than SOC (acceptable).
60 minutes
Image quality - consistent scan time
Participants will be scanned using 2 versions (standard and designed) of 6 sequences (12 scans total). Scan time will remain the same for each pair. Radiologists will compare each pair for differences in image quality using a 5-point Likert scale where 1= A much worse than B, 2=A slightly worse than B, 3=A comparable to B, 4=A slightly better than B, 5=A much better than B. A=new spiral scans and B=SOC scans.
60 minutes
Signal to Noise Ratio (SNR)
Measuring the SNR in images, by measuring the signal strength in the image and the calculated noise in those images and taking the ratio. Researchers will compare this SNR to that which their methods predicted.
60 minutes
Image quality - acoustic comfort
Image quality will be compared between running at full strength, which is noisy, and running at reduced strength, which should be quieter. A 5-point Likert scale will be used, where 1= A much worse than B, 2=A slightly worse than B, 3=A comparable to B, 4=A slightly better than B, 5=A much better than B. A=spiral scans with full gradient strength and B=spiral scans with reduced gradient strength (that should be quieter).
60 minutes
Acoustic noise
Scans will be compared between running at full strength and running at reduced strength. Participants will rate the acoustic noise using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1= A much louder than B, 2=A slightly louder than B, 3=A comparable to B, 4=A slightly quieter than B, 5=A much quieter than B. A=spiral scans with full gradient strength and B=spiral scans with reduced gradient strength.
60 minutes
Difference in Image quality
Based on the results of the other 5 outcome measures, specifically whether scan time impacts image quality, the desired time will be used and scans will be compared between SOC and their method. Image quality will be measured using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1= A much worse than B, 2=A slightly worse than B, 3=A comparable to B, 4=A slightly better than B, 5=A much better than B. A=new spiral scans and B=SOC scans.
60 minutes
Study Arms (6)
Healthy Participants - Scan Efficiency
EXPERIMENTALParticipants not otherwise undergoing a brain MRI
Standard of Care (SOC) Brain MRI
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants undergoing SOC MRI
Healthy Participants - Tau
EXPERIMENTALParticipants not otherwise undergoing a brain MRI
Healthy Participants - image quality
EXPERIMENTALParticipants not otherwise undergoing a brain MRI
Healthy Participants - SNR
EXPERIMENTALParticipants not otherwise undergoing a brain MRI
Healthy Participants - Gradient Derating
EXPERIMENTALParticipants not otherwise undergoing a brain MRI
Interventions
90 participants will undergo a 60 minute SOC brain MRI followed by 15 minute spiral MRI
6 participants will be scanned using 2 versions (SOC and spiral) pf 6 sequences (12 scans total).
10 participants will be scanned with 3 sequences, 3 times (9 total scans per participants)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adults at least 18 years
- Able to provide written informed consent on their own behalf
- Adults at least 18 years
- Able to provide written informed consent on their own behalf
- Scheduled for standard of care brain MRI
You may not qualify if:
- Unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Contraindication(s) to or inability to undergo MRI
- Currently pregnant
- Participants requiring intravenous (IV) conscious sedation for imaging are not eligible; participants requiring mild, oral anxiolytics for the clinical MRI will be allowed as long as the following criteria are met:
- participant has their own prescription for the medication
- informed consent process is conducted prior to the self-administration of the medication
- they come to the research visit with a driver
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Wisconsin - Madison
Madison, Wisconsin, 53705, United States
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Pipe, PhD
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 3, 2025
First Posted
September 11, 2025
Study Start (Estimated)
August 1, 2028
Primary Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2031
Study Completion (Estimated)
May 1, 2031
Last Updated
September 17, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-09