NCT07167212

Brief Summary

Background: The diaphragm muscle is a respiratory muscle with postural function. Patients with chronic LBP (CLBP) are more susceptible to diaphragm fatigue than healthy people and, therefore, can likely benefit from exercises designed to improve strength/endurance in this muscle. Studying the results of diaphragmatic training versus myofascial release was a strategy for determining which of them was the most effective in improving pain, flexibility and disability in the patients with chronic non- specific low back pain. Objective: The objective of the study will be to compare the effect of Diaphragm training and myofascial release back pain patients. Methods: A randomized clinical trial will be conducted on 44 patients aged 20-45 years. The patients will be randomized using lottery method. Group A will underwent diaphragmatic training with four positions with hot-pack and therapeutic ultrasound as baseline treatment NPRS will be used to measure the intensity of pain, ODI for the measurement of disability and Schober's test for lumbar flexibility before and after the completion of treatment sessions. Group B will receive myofascial release of diaphragm for 15 minutes with two sets of repetition of 10 breaths with a one-minute interval between them. Total duration will be 4 weeks.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2024

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 16, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 24, 2025

Completed
17 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 10, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 1, 2025

Completed
10 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 11, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 18, 2025

Status Verified

September 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 1, 2025

Last Update Submit

September 14, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

PainFlexibilityDisabilityStrengthLumbar

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • Pain Level

    Pain level will be assessed by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The participants rated their pain on a defined 0-10 scale, where 0 is no pain, and 10 is the worst pain imaginable. NRS has different advantages, such as simplicity, reproducibility, and sensitivity to small changes in pain. NRS takes less than 1 min to complete and is a valid and reliable scale to measure pain intensity

    Pre-intervention and 4 weeks Post-intervention

  • Disability

    The disability due to NSLBP will be assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), which is a self-administered questionnaire to evaluate the limitations of various daily living activities. The ODI is one of the most common scoring systems used for patients with LBP. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, where a higher score indicates a higher level of disability.

    Pre and 4 week post-intervention

  • Flexibility

    The lumbar flexibility will be measured by Modified Schober test. The examiner puts his thumbs on the inferior margin of the subject's PSIS. An ink mark is drawn along the midline of the lumbar spine horizontal to the PSIS (lower landmark). While the examiner holds the tape firmly against the subject's skin, he marks a second line 15 cm above the original one (higher landmark). Then the subject is asked to do an active anterior flexion of the trunk without increasing the pain. The new distance between the lower and higher landmarks is then measured. The subject returns to the neutral position. The difference in the initial distance between the skin markings in the neutral position and the new measurements made in the flexion position is used to indicate the amount of lumbar flexion. Each therapist recorded measurements to the nearest mm

    Pre and 4 weeks Post intervention

Study Arms (2)

Diaphragm Training

EXPERIMENTAL

Diaphragm Training

Other: Diaphragm Training

Myofascial Release technique

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Myofascial Release technique

Other: Myofascial Release Technique

Interventions

The diaphragm serves dual roles in respiration and postural control, yet its contribution is often overlooked in core stability exercise (CSE) programs for low back pain (LBP) rehabilitation. Abdominal hollowing, or the 'tummy tuck,' targets TrA and lumbar multifidus. Diaphragmatic breathing (DB) increases intra-abdominal pressure, contributing to lumbar stability. The intervention included four progressive weeks: Week 1-Supine and Crocodile breathing; Week 2-Supine and Crocodile with TheraBand; Week 3-Seated and 90/90/90 breathing; Week 4-Seated and 90/90/90 with TheraBand. Supine emphasized diaphragmatic expansion with resistance at the thoracolumbar junction; Crocodile focused on lateral rib expansion; Seated required upright posture with rib control; 90/90/90 integrated deep breathing with resisted stabilization. This study evaluates DB combined with CSE on pain, disability, muscle activity, and sleep quality in chronic LBP.

Diaphragm Training

The myofascial release technique for the diaphragm was performed with the participant lying supine and limbs relaxed. The therapist, positioned at the head, placed the pisiform, hypothenar, and last three fingers bilaterally under the seventh to tenth rib costal cartilages, forearms aligned toward the shoulders. During inspiration, gentle traction was applied cephalad and slightly laterally, accompanying rib elevation. On exhalation, pressure was directed inward along the costal margin to maintain resistance. With each breath, traction was gradually deepened to improve release. The maneuver consisted of two sets of 10 deep breaths with a 1-minute rest between sets. Figure 1 illustrates the manual diaphragm release technique (source: author's photo). This method, adapted from Rocha et al. (2015), emphasizes progressive traction and controlled resistance to facilitate diaphragmatic mobility and rib cage expansion.

Myofascial Release technique

Eligibility Criteria

Age20 Years - 45 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • with intermittent nonspecific CLBP for ≥12 weeks, with VAS between 3 to 7. All participants will be active at a recreational level, history of at least 12 weeks of NLBP, absence of radiculopathy or spinal damage due to tumors, stenosis, or fractures, and a minimum level of physical activity to be able to perform the exercises.

You may not qualify if:

  • lumbar surgery experience,
  • inflammatory spinal disease,
  • spinal deformities,
  • neurologic radiating pain

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Arif Memorial Teaching Hospital

Lahore, Punjab Province, 54900, Pakistan

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Siglan U, Colak S. Effects of diaphragmatic and iliopsoas myofascial release in patients with chronic low back pain: A randomized controlled study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2023 Jan;33:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2022.09.029. Epub 2022 Sep 29.

    PMID: 36775506BACKGROUND
  • Otadi K, Nakhostin Ansari N, Sharify S, Fakhari Z, Sarafraz H, Aria A, Rasouli O. Effects of combining diaphragm training with electrical stimulation on pain, function, and balance in athletes with chronic low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2021 Mar 4;13(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13102-021-00250-y.

    PMID: 33663607BACKGROUND
  • Masroor S, Tanwar T, Aldabbas M, Iram I, Veqar Z. Effect of Adding Diaphragmatic Breathing Exercises to Core Stabilization Exercises on Pain, Muscle Activity, Disability, and Sleep Quality in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Control Trial. J Chiropr Med. 2023 Dec;22(4):275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2023.07.001. Epub 2023 Sep 2.

    PMID: 38205226BACKGROUND
  • Oh YJ, Park SH, Lee MM. Comparison of Effects of Abdominal Draw-In Lumbar Stabilization Exercises with and without Respiratory Resistance on Women with Low Back Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Sci Monit. 2020 Mar 17;26:e921295. doi: 10.12659/MSM.921295.

    PMID: 32182226BACKGROUND
  • Gonzalez-Alvarez FJ, Valenza MC, Torres-Sanchez I, Cabrera-Martos I, Rodriguez-Torres J, Castellote-Caballero Y. Effects of diaphragm stretching on posterior chain muscle kinematics and rib cage and abdominal excursion: a randomized controlled trial. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016 Jun 16;20(5):405-411. doi: 10.1590/bjpt-rbf.2014.0169.

    PMID: 27333481BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Pain

Interventions

Myofascial Release Therapy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

MassageTherapy, Soft TissueMusculoskeletal ManipulationsComplementary TherapiesTherapeuticsPhysical Therapy ModalitiesRehabilitation
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Senior Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2025

First Posted

September 11, 2025

Study Start

December 16, 2024

Primary Completion

March 24, 2025

Study Completion

April 10, 2025

Last Updated

September 18, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-09

Locations