Upper Cervical Mobilization vs. Sub-Occipital MET for Neck Pain and FHP
Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization Versus Sub Occipital Muscle Energy Technique in Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain and Forward Head Posture
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
forty-five patients with MNP and FHP age from 25-40 years will be randomly assigned into three groups: Group A (study): 15patients will receive (upper cervical translatoric mobilization) and traditional physical therapy, Group B (study): 15patients received sub occipital muscle energy technique and traditional physical therapy, and Group C (control): 15 patients will receive the traditional physical therapy treatment only . Interventions will be conducted three times a week for four weeks. Craniovertebral angle (CVA) using Photographic Posture Analysis Method (surgimap software), pain intensity using viual analogue scale (VAS), Cervical ROM using CROM device, and neck functional ability using Neck Disability Index (NDI) will be assessed for all participants before and after the treatment program.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 10, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2025
CompletedJanuary 5, 2026
January 1, 2026
1 month
August 31, 2025
January 1, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Intensity
Pain intensity will be assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm line where 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable". A lower score indicates improvement.
Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain Intensity
Baseline and after 4 weeks of treatment
Craniovertebral Angle (CVA) via Photographic Posture Analysis
baseline and after 4 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive Upper Cervical Translatoric Mobilization (UC-TSM) applied to the upper cervical spine (C0-C2), in addition to conventional physical therapy (hot pack and Kendall exercises), three times per week for 4 weeks.
Sub-Occipital Muscle Energy Technique
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive Sub-Occipital Muscle Energy Technique (MET) targeting the sub-occipital muscles, in addition to conventional physical therapy (hot pack and Kendall exercises), three times per week for 4 weeks.
traditional physical therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants will receive conventional physical therapy only, including application of a hot pack for 15 minutes followed by Kendall exercises for postural correction, three times per week for 4 weeks.
Interventions
(UC-TSM) is defined as a system of manual techniques using straight-line forces delivered in a parallel or perpendicular direction to an individual vertebral joint or motion segment there is also increasing in body of evidence supporting the its clinical effectiveness and safety in the management of patients with cervical impairments.
Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is another form of a gentle manual therapy intervention that primarily targets the soft tissues, though it also contributes significantly to joint mobilization. It has been reported that, adding MET to exercise program resulted in better improvement in CVA and FHP than exercise group only
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- patients aged from 20-60 Years
- suffering from M echanical neck pain with Craniovertebral angle ; \< 53
- their NDI ranging from 30-48% \[9\]. Patients were excluded from the study if they have injury or trauma to cervical region, spinal surgery, cervical canal stenosis, radicular pain and malignancy.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients were excluded from the study if they have injury or trauma to cervical region, spinal surgery, cervical canal stenosis, radicular pain and malignancy.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- MTI Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of Physical Therapy, Benha University
Cairo, Benha, Egypt
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
reda K. Abdelrazik, associate professor
Benha University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Benha University
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 31, 2025
First Posted
September 10, 2025
Study Start
September 12, 2025
Primary Completion
October 15, 2025
Study Completion
December 1, 2025
Last Updated
January 5, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share