Optimal Ablation Strategies for Persistent AF With HF
1 other identifier
interventional
300
1 country
10
Brief Summary
Atrial fibrillation (AF) in the context of heart failure (HF) is associated with a markedly poor prognosis. Catheter ablation has been shown to improve outcomes in this population, enhancing ablation success rates in these patients is critical for further reducing morbidity and mortality. We conducted this multicenter, randomized clinical trial to systematically evaluate the optimal ablation strategy in patients with heart failure and persistent AF.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable heart-failure
Started Jan 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable heart-failure
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 4, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
September 4, 2025
August 1, 2025
6 years
August 26, 2025
August 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits
The primary endpoint was the incidence of a composite of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization or urgent visits due to worsening heart failure during the follow-up period after a single catheter ablation procedure
12, 18, 24, 36, 46, 60months
freedom from any documented AF/AT
freedom from any documented AF/AT episode lasting more than 30 seconds after the blanking period without anti-arrhythmic drug treatment
12, 18, 24, 36, 48, 60months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
AF burden <1%
12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Improvement in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class
12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Change in 6-minute walk test
12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after a single procedure
Change in N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)
Month 3,12, 24, 36, 48, 60 after a single procedure
Incidence of procedure-related complications
30 days after a single procedure
Study Arms (3)
Anatomical-guided Ablation Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the ANAT group would receive anatomical-guided ablation after PVI, including linear ablation and Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion.
Electrogram-guided Ablation Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in the EGM group received target electrogram ablation after PVI while did not receive anatomical-guided ablation. We defined the target electrograms into 4 types as follows.(1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity (3) High-Frequency Potentials (4) Focal Activity
Extensive Electrogram-Anatomical Guided Ablation Group
EXPERIMENTALPatients in the extensive ablation group (EXT group) would receive EGM-guided ablation firstly. The anatomical-guided ablation would be performed after EGM-guided ablation no matter whether AF terminated during EGM-guided ablation.
Interventions
pulmonary vein ioslation; target electrograms ablation, including (1) Spatial-temporal Dispersion Activation, (2) Locally Short Cycle Length Activity, (3) High-Frequency Potentials, (4) Focal Activity.
pulmonary vein isolation; LA roof, posterior inferior wall and mitral isthmus linear lesion; Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol infusion.
pulmonary vein isolation; target electrogram ablation; linear ablation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age: Patients aged 18-80 years, with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF), regardless of ejection fraction (EF).
- Diagnosis of Heart Failure:
- Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF): LVEF ≤ 40%. Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF): LVEF \> 40%, including HFmrEF (LVEF 41-50%).
- Symptomatic Atrial Fibrillation: Patients with symptomatic persistent AF who have failed or are intolerant to at least one antiarrhythmic drug.
- NYHA Class II-III: Patients with heart failure classified as NYHA class II-III, who are symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Informed Consent: Able to provide written informed consent for participation in the study.
- Guideline-Recommended Pharmacologic Therapy: Patients who have received and are currently on guideline-recommended pharmacologic therapy for heart failure, including but not limited to ACE inhibitors, beta-blockers, diuretics, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs).
You may not qualify if:
- Any of the following criteria shall be excluded.
- End-Stage Heart Failure: Patients with heart failure classified as NYHA class IV or with LVEF ≤ 20%.
- Severe Comorbidities:
- Patients with severe pulmonary disease (e.g., COPD, severe restrictive lung disease).
- Severe renal dysfunction (eGFR \< 30 mL/min/1.73m²) or advanced liver disease.
- Active malignancy or other terminal illnesses with a prognosis of less than one year.
- Inability to Tolerate Ablation:
- <!-- -->
- Patients unable to undergo catheter ablation due to anatomical or procedural issues.
- Patients with contraindications to the procedure, including allergy to contrast agents or inability to tolerate anesthesia.
- Left atrial thrombus confirmed by preoperative esophageal ultrasound; 7. Uncontrolled Arrhythmias: Patients with persistent or paroxysmal AF who are unable to maintain sinus rhythm despite optimal medical therapy or require frequent hospitalization for arrhythmia control.
- \. Pregnancy: Pregnant or breastfeeding women. 9. Contraindications to Anticoagulation: 10. Patients who are contraindicated for anticoagulation therapy (e.g., history of major bleeding or bleeding diathesis).
- \. History of Severe Valve Disease: Patients with a history of severe valve disease and/or prosthetic valve replacement.
- \. Recent Myocardial Infarction or Stroke: Patients who have had a myocardial infarction or stroke within the past 3 months.
- \. Contrast Agent Allergy: Patients with a known allergy to contrast agents. 14. Contraindications for Cardiac Catheterization: Any contraindications for cardiac catheterization, including inability to safely perform the procedure.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Xu Liulead
Study Sites (10)
The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital
Anqing, Anhui, 246000, China
The Central Hospital of Wuhan, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430014, China
Changshu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Changshu, Jiangsu, 215516, China
Xuzhou Central Hospital
Xuzhou, Jiangsu, 221009, China
Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine
Jinan, Shandong, 250000, China
Jinan City People's Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, 271100, China
Affiliated Hospital of Jining Medical University
Jining, Shandong, 272000, China
Yuhuan Second People's Hospital
Yuhuan, Zhejiang, 317600, China
Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Chest Hospital
Shanghai, 200030, China
Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
Shanghai, 200127, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 26, 2025
First Posted
September 4, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The individual participant data (IPD) from this study will not be shared publicly due to concerns regarding patient confidentiality and the sensitive nature of medical data. Given the potential risks of identifying participants from detailed clinical information, the data will remain confidential and will not be made available for public sharing. Additionally, the study involves proprietary methodologies and ongoing analyses that are part of the intellectual property of the institution. As such, sharing the IPD at this stage could compromise the integrity of the study's findings and its future applications.