NCT07151950

Brief Summary

This mixed-methods usability study evaluates the effectiveness of the Obi Gen 3 robotic feeding device in meeting user needs among providers, caregivers, and patients. Participants will complete a one-week trial using Obi in home, school, or community settings, followed by feedback surveys and optional interviews. The study seeks to validate that the device design meets usability requirements prior to broader deployment.

Trial Health

55
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
50

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2025

Shorter than P25 for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
active not recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 10, 2025

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 12, 2025

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 12, 2025

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 3, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 31, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

September 3, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

August 12, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 26, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

upper extremity impairmentsRobot Assisted Feedingassistive technologyusability

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (3)

  • System Usability Scale

    The System Usability Scale (SUS) is a widely used, reliable tool for measuring the usability of a product or system. It consists of a 10-item questionnaire with a five-point Likert scale ranging from "Strongly Disagree" to "Strongly Agree." SUS provides a single score on a scale from 0 to 100 that reflects the overall ease of use and user satisfaction. Developed by John Brooke in 1986, the SUS is technology-agnostic and can be applied across a wide range of systems, including software, websites, and assistive technologies. Its simplicity, robustness, and versatility make it a standard in usability evaluation.

    one week post trial

  • Non-Standardized, Custom Survey

    Another primary outcome for this study is stakeholder-reported usability of the Obi Gen 3 device, as assessed by structured, study-specific surveys developed for this clinical investigation. Separate but parallel survey instruments were created for patients, caregivers, and clinicians/providers to capture device performance and user experience from multiple perspectives. Each survey includes both closed-ended and open-ended questions addressing: * Ease of use - learning to operate the device, understanding controls, and integrating it into mealtime routines * Effectiveness - ability to self-feed, control bite timing and size, and accommodate a variety of foods * Satisfaction - overall impressions, perceived benefits, and willingness to recommend the device * Safety and comfort - perceived safety during operation, confidence in device reliability, and comfort while using the device * Suggestions for improvement - opportunities for design or functionality enhancements

    one week trial

  • Functional Eating Status

    Functional eating status is measured by the clinical provider at baseline (without use of Obi) and again one week post-trial (with use of Obi). The participants' level of performance is assessed on a Likert Scale as follows: 0 - No problem, 1 - Mild, 2 - Moderate, 3 - Severe, 4 - Complete

    One week trial

Study Arms (3)

Providers who recommend Obi

Caregivers of Persons who trial Obi

Caregivers who assist persons with disabilities who trial Obi are invited to share their perspectives and experiences in helping to set up the device, interpret instructions, and describe the experience of trialing Obi from their perspective as a caregiver

Device: One-week trial of Obi Medical device, which provides robotic assistance with feeding to persons with upper extremity impairments who are unable to self-feed in the traditional manner using utensils

Persons with Disabilities who trial Obi

Device: One-week trial of Obi Medical device, which provides robotic assistance with feeding to persons with upper extremity impairments who are unable to self-feed in the traditional manner using utensils

Interventions

This study explores the stakeholders' experiences in recommending and using Obi. Stakeholders/Participants include: 1. Persons with disabilities or conditions which prevent them from successfully using their upper extremities (UE) to self-feed independently 2. Caregivers of the persons with disabilities described above 3. Providers (OT, SLP, PT, ATP, etc.) who provide services to persons with disabilities

Caregivers of Persons who trial ObiPersons with Disabilities who trial Obi

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

The study will enroll three key stakeholder groups to evaluate the usability of the Obi Gen 3 device: Pediatric and Adult Patients - Individuals aged 5 years and older with functional self-feeding impairments who are recommended for Obi use by a clinician. Patients must have sufficient cognitive and communication abilities to provide feedback directly or with assistance. Caregivers - Family members or paid support personnel who assist the patient with meals or device operation. Caregivers will provide insight into the impact of the device on mealtime routines, supervision needs, and caregiving burden. Clinicians/Providers - Healthcare professionals (e.g., occupational therapists, speech-language pathologists, rehabilitation specialists) who assess, recommend, or train patients in Obi use. Providers will evaluate device usability, safety, and integration into clinical practice.

You may qualify if:

  • Providers with relevant expertise to recommend and evaluate patients' ability to use Obi
  • Caregivers directly assisting users with Obi
  • Adults or children (≥5 years) needing assistive feeding technology to self-feed

You may not qualify if:

  • Inability to provide informed consent/assent
  • Cognitive impairments that may prevent the ability to understand or respond to the survey questions
  • Non-English speakers (English-only materials)
  • Residents of California who are new Obi users

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Desin, Llc

Jacksonville, Florida, 32256, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cerebral PalsyAmyotrophic Lateral SclerosisRett Syndrome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Brain Damage, ChronicBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System DiseasesSpinal Cord DiseasesMotor Neuron DiseaseNeurodegenerative DiseasesTDP-43 ProteinopathiesNeuromuscular DiseasesProteostasis DeficienciesMetabolic DiseasesNutritional and Metabolic DiseasesX-Linked Intellectual DisabilityIntellectual DisabilityNeurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsGenetic Diseases, X-LinkedGenetic Diseases, InbornCongenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and AbnormalitiesHeredodegenerative Disorders, Nervous System

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator & Research Consultant

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 12, 2025

First Posted

September 3, 2025

Study Start

May 10, 2025

Primary Completion

August 12, 2025

Study Completion

October 31, 2025

Last Updated

September 3, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared due to the small sample size, the vulnerability of the pediatric population, and the inclusion of potentially identifiable health information. Data will be reported only in aggregate form to protect participant privacy and comply with applicable privacy regulations (e.g., HIPAA).

Locations