Comparison of Postoperative Effects of Articaine and Lidocaine in Mucogingival Surgery
Differences in Soft Tissue Healing and Vascularization Between Articaine and Lidocaine: A Randomized Clinical and Ultrasonographic Study
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to compare and evaluate the effects of using lidocaine 2% (with adrenaline) and articaine 4% (with adrenaline) in free gingival graft (FGG) surgery on postoperative wound healing, changes in blood flow in the surgical area during the healing process, patients' postoperative pain levels, and anxiety levels before and after surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2025
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 30, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 30, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 14, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2025
CompletedAugust 28, 2025
August 1, 2025
7 months
August 14, 2025
August 27, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
early wound healing score (EHS)
The healing of the recipient site was evaluated using the EHS index during clinical exams on postoperative days 3, 7, and 14. The EHS index includes parameters of hemostasis (CSH), inflammation (CSI), and re-epithelialization (CSR). The total score ranges from 0 (worst healing) to 10 (best healing)
3rd day, 7th day, 14th day
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Ultrasonographic Evaluations
3rd, 7th, and 14th days
Modified Dental Anxiety Scale (MDAS)
baseline and 14 days after the procedure,
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S and STAI-T)
baseline and 14 days after the procedure,
Study Arms (2)
lidocaine HCL
OTHERParticipants will receive lidocaine HCL 2% with adrenaline for local anesthesia before free gingival surgery once only
articaine HCL
OTHERParticipants will receive articaine HCL 4% with adrenaline for local anestesia before free gingival surgery once only
Interventions
Patient were received infiltrative anesthesia with Lidocaine (Jetokain, Adeka Ilaç, Samsun, Türkiye): Active ingredient: Each 1 ml contains 20 mg lidocaine hydrochloride (HCL) and 0.012 mg epinephrine base. Excipients: Sodium metabisulfite, sodium chloride, water for injection.
Patients were received Infiltrative anesthesia with Articaine (Ultracain DS Forte, Sanofi Aventis İlaçları, Istanbul, Türkiye): Active ingredient: 40 mg articaine HCL and 0.012 mg epinephrine per 1 ml. Excipients: Sodium chloride, sodium metabisulfite, hydrochloric acid, water for injection
FGG surgery was performed around natural teeth and implants where keratinized gingival tissue was inadequate.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients\> 18 years requiring FGG surgery with ≤ 1 mm width of attached gingiva
- No systemic diseases or pregnancy.
- Smoking ≤10 cigarettes/day
- Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤10% (four sites per tooth).
- Need for FGG due to insufficient attached gingiva
- No history of mucogingival or periodontal surgery at experimental sites
You may not qualify if:
- Use of oral contraceptives, psychotropic drugs, sedatives, or NSAIDs
- Allergy or hypersensitivity to local anesthetics,
- Orofacial neurological symptoms,
- Active infection in the surgical area,
- Pathological mental conditions such as dementia or psychosis, or lack of cooperation,
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry
Denizli, 20100, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Kesici S, Kesici U, Ulusoy H, Erturkuner P, Turkmen A, Arda O. [Effects of local anesthetics on wound healing]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2018 Jul-Aug;68(4):375-382. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2018.01.016. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
PMID: 29884529BACKGROUNDAl-Saffar, M.T., A.S. Mahmood, and M.S. Sulaiman, Impact of Local Anesthesia on Wound Healing. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, 2020. 14(4): p. 1869-1874.
BACKGROUNDGiovannitti JA Jr, Rosenberg MB, Phero JC. Pharmacology of local anesthetics used in oral surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Aug;25(3):453-65, vi. doi: 10.1016/j.coms.2013.03.003. Epub 2013 May 7.
PMID: 23660127BACKGROUNDLuo W, Zheng K, Kuang H, Li Z, Wang J, Mei J. The potential of articaine as new generation of local anesthesia in dental clinics: A review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 2;101(48):e32089. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000032089.
PMID: 36482533BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Aysan Lektemur Alpan, PhD DDS
Pamukkale University Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- FACTORIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Periodontology Department
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 14, 2025
First Posted
August 28, 2025
Study Start
January 1, 2025
Primary Completion
July 30, 2025
Study Completion
July 30, 2025
Last Updated
August 28, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
I can share it after my article is published if there is a valid reason.