Helping Couples Communicate Better: Does This Help Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Respond Better to a Step Count Prescription?
PartnerStepT2D
A Dyadic Coping Strategy to Enhance Step Prescription Effects in Type 2 Diabetes: a Bayesian Adaptive Basket Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Being active is one way to reach better blood sugar control and heart health in type 2 diabetes. The investigators developed a strategy to help people with type 2 diabetes walk more. They track their steps with a step counter and set targets with their doctor through a kind of 'step prescription.' While this strategy helps people increase their physical activity, it can be useful to have support besides the clinic visits. Their partner might be a good person to help. Partners often have similar activity levels. Partners of people with type 2 diabetes are also more likely to develop type 2 diabetes. There are good reasons to work together! However, not all partners communicate in a way that helps them work together effectively. The investigators are going to give a step counter and step prescriptions to a large group of people with type 2 diabetes. The partners will also receive counters and step prescriptions. Half of the couples will be randomized (assigned to a group based on something equivalent to a coin toss) to participate in online or in-person sessions with a counselor. They will work together to figure out how to communicate more kindly and effectively. The investigators will see if the people with these sessions wind up having higher steps and better sugar control than the people who do not. To figure out in which types of couples the strategy works, The investigators will also divide the couples into groups based on the type of marriage that they have (figured out through a questionnaire) and body size. The investigators will see if the counseling strategy helps in both 'high' and 'low' quality relationships and if couples where both partners have extra weight respond differently to the strategy than other couples. During the trial, if The investigators see that the strategy is not working well in one particular group of people, The investigators may recruit fewer in this group and more in the others. The investigators will do this in consultation with specialized statisticians who will look at the data at specific points in time. This is a way of making sure that the investigators are testing the right strategy in the right group, increasing the 'efficiency' and relevance of the study.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable type-2-diabetes
Started Dec 2025
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 26, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2027
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2027
December 4, 2025
November 1, 2025
1.7 years
August 19, 2025
November 26, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in steps/day
Difference between mean baseline (week 1) and final (week 24) steps/day; daily steps are automatically uploaded to a secure cloud-based server and pulled by our research team for weekly goals and outcome assessment. We require at least 4 days of measurement. If sufficient days are not captured in week 1, we may compute based on the earliest of weeks 2 through 4 that includes sufficient data. If sufficient days are not captured in week 24, we may compute based on the latest of weeks 20 through 24 that includes sufficient data.
The primary outcome is at 24 weeks and a secondary outcome will be at 12 weeks (midpoint)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in A1C
24 weeks
Change in insulin resistance
24 weeks
Change in systolic blood pressure
24 weeks
Total steps
24 weeks
Dyadic coping
24 weeks
Other Outcomes (11)
Change in body mass index (BMI)
24 weeks
Change in marital quality
24 weeks
Change in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL)
24 weeks
- +8 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Step Count tracking and goals alone
ACTIVE COMPARATORWe will provide this active comparator arm with weekly step count goals and a step counter for the 24 week study period. We provide further details in the description of the intervention with the same title.
Step Count tracking and goals with dyadic coping intervention
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will receive the same step tracking and goal intervention described for the active comparator but will additionally participate in the dyadic coping intervention.
Interventions
We will provide participants and partners with Fitbits for the duration of the trial. After one week of step counting, the next week target will be to increase by 500 steps/day if baseline \< 5000 steps/day; increase by 750 steps/day if baseline 5000 to 7,500 steps/day; and increase by 1,000 steps/day if baseline \> 7,500 steps/day). Each week thereafter, study staff will pull the step data and apply an algorithm to generate new targets for the next week. In our algorithm, subsequent targets are higher if the participant exceeds prior week targets, and lower/unchanged if below target. This is similar to the algorithm we used in our trial ACTIVE PATIENT GDM (Dasgupta K, Chan D, Bond R, Garfield N, Coolen J, Halperin IJ, Peters TM, et al. Step and weight tracking with targets and coaching interventions in gestational diabetes: A randomized factorial feasibility trial. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2025 Jun;224:112241. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2025.112241. Epub 2025 May 9. PMID: 40349846.)
Couples will participate in 8 one-hour coaching sessions over 12 weeks (virtual, in-person, or a combination, as preferred). The sessions aim to enhance the couple's understanding of how they influence each other. Both couple members will explore their preferences in terms of ways of communicating and supporting one another's goals. We will use changes in steps as a context to explore how partners can effectively support and "coach" each other without without eliciting behavioural reactance. We will use are goal setting, action planning, self-monitoring, graded tasks, social environment restructuring, and social support. The coaches will be psychology students. They will receive structured training on the coaching strategy from a licensed mental health professional. We will record the sessions for fidelity and quality assurance purposes. All coaches will meet weekly with the supervising licensed mental health professional.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- (i) Index participant has T2D;
- (ii) Index participant 45 years of age or older;
- (iii) Index participant and partner: Co-habiting with a partner (same or different sex) for two or more years;
- (iv) Index participant and partner: Absence of gait difficulties or other co-morbid conditions that impede walking in the index participant;
- (v) Willingness to complete an audiovisual recording of a conversation between the couple members to capture couple communication styles
- (vi) Index participant and partner Smartphone and Internet access.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
St. Mary's Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 0A2, Canada
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2, Canada
McGill University Health Centre
Montreal, Quebec, H4A 0B1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kaberi Dasgupta, MDCM, MSc, FRCPC
Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jean-Philippe Gouin, PhD
Concordia University, Montreal
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Shirin Golchi, PhD
McGill University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Masking Details
- The technicians who perform the assays (hemoglobin A1C, lipid profiles) are masked to study arm. Steps/day measurements are captured through step counting devices. Blood pressure and weight are assessed through automated devices.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Scientist, Professor of Medicine, Physician
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 19, 2025
First Posted
August 26, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 1, 2027
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 1, 2027
Last Updated
December 4, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-11