NCT07137546

Brief Summary

Bile duct injury (BDI) remains the most feared complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, particularly in difficult gallbladder cases. The fundus-first technique has emerged as a potentially safer alternative to classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy for challenging cases. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial compared the efficacy and safety of fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy (FF-LC) versus classical laparoscopic cholecystectomy (C-LC) in 174 patients with difficult gallbladder characteristics. The primary outcome was bile duct injury rate. Secondary outcomes included conversion to open surgery, operative parameters, and postoperative complications.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
174

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2024

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2024

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 14, 2025

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2025

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2026

Completed
16 days until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 17, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

February 19, 2026

Status Verified

February 1, 2026

Enrollment Period

1.8 years

First QC Date

August 14, 2025

Last Update Submit

February 17, 2026

Conditions

Keywords

Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomyConventional laparoscopic cholecystectomyBile duct injuryDifficult gallbladderCritical view of safety

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Bile Duct Injury Rate

    Incidence of bile duct injury, confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography, direct visualization, or postoperative imaging.

    Intraoperative to 30 days postoperative

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Conversion to Open Surgery Rate

    Intraoperative

  • Operative Time

    Intraoperative

  • Time to Achieve Critical View of Safety (CVS)

    Intraoperative

  • CVS Achievement Rate

    Intraoperative

  • Estimated Blood Loss

    Intraoperative

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (6)

  • Intraoperative Complications Rate

    Intraoperative

  • Postoperative Complications

    Up to 30 days postoperative

  • Major Postoperative Complications

    Up to 30 days postoperative

  • +3 more other outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Fundus-First Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ( FFLC)

EXPERIMENTAL

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy starting dissection at the gallbladder fundus, progressing retrograde toward the cystic duct/artery. Critical View of Safety (CVS) confirmed before duct division.

Procedure: Fundus-First Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ( FFLC)

Classical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The standard "critical view of safety" technique (anterior-posterior dissection of Calot's triangle first).

Procedure: Classical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC)

Interventions

* Standard 4-port laparoscopic setup * Carbon dioxide (CO₂) pneumoperitoneum (12-15 mmHg) * Dissection begins at gallbladder fundus * Peritoneum incised from infundibulum to fundus along liver bed * Gallbladder dissected from fundus toward infundibulum * Cystic artery and duct identified and divided last * Critical view of safety achieved before vessel division

Fundus-First Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ( FFLC)

* Standard 4-port laparoscopic setup * Carbon dioxide (CO₂) pneumoperitoneum (12-15 mmHg) * Dissection begins at Calot's triangle * Critical view of safety achieved first * Cystic artery and duct divided before gallbladder bed dissection * Gallbladder dissected from liver bed

Classical Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (CLC)

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 80 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18-80 years
  • Symptomatic cholelithiasis or cholecystitis requiring laparoscopic cholecystectomy (elective or emergency)
  • Difficult gallbladder characteristics: Acute cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 Grade II/III), wall thickness \>4 mm on US, pericholecystic fluid, impacted stone in Hartmann's pouch/cystic duct, previous upper abdominal surgery, BMI \>30 kg/m², ≥3 previous cholecystitis episodes, contracted gallbladder, Mirizzi syndrome Type I/II, empyema, severe pericholecystic adhesions on imaging, suspected anatomical variations
  • The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Suitable for laparoscopic approach
  • Informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Suspected gallbladder malignancy
  • Choledocholithiasis requiring endoscopic intervention
  • Mirizzi syndrome Grade III-IV
  • Gallbladder perforation with generalized peritonitis
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Contraindications to laparoscopy (severe cardiopulmonary disease, coagulopathy)
  • Previous biliary or hepatic surgery
  • Cirrhosis with portal hypertension
  • Active coagulopathy
  • Patient refusal

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Liver and GIT hospital / Minia university

Minya, Minya Governorate, 61519, Egypt

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

CholecystitisCholecystitis, Acute

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Gallbladder DiseasesBiliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Saleh K Saleh, MD

    Minia University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Surgeons are not blinded due to the intervention's nature; data collectors, assessors, and analysts are blinded.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Lecturer

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 14, 2025

First Posted

August 22, 2025

Study Start

May 1, 2024

Primary Completion

February 1, 2026

Study Completion

February 17, 2026

Last Updated

February 19, 2026

Record last verified: 2026-02

Locations