NCT07136584

Brief Summary

Parents and caregivers of children who have a chronic condition carry a large care burden and are at higher risk of having mental health symptoms. This study aims to see if completion of a mental health questionnaire by parents / caregivers at or before the child's paediatric appointment can help identify any symptoms of stress, anxiety or depression. Following the questionnaire, parents / caregivers will be provided with the results of the questionnaire along with an information resource sheet. This will include information on anxiety, stress and depression, as well as different agencies they can contact to get support. Parents / caregivers will be followed up at 3 and 6 months to see if they have any changes to mental health and quality of life, and whether they accessed any support services. The primary aim for this trial is to see whether parents / caregivers find this process acceptable, and whether it can work in a busy hospital clinic.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
100

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Oct 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 7, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

October 22, 2025

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 28, 2026

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 28, 2026

Completed
Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

6 months

First QC Date

August 7, 2025

Last Update Submit

November 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

parentcaregiverchronic illnessscreeningmental healthanxietydepressionstressreferral pathways

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Acceptability of the overall SOS Model for caregivers

    The proportion of caregivers with a 95% confidence interval who completed screening questionnaires and received information resource sheets who report it as acceptable as measured by response to a text message: "Thinking about your recent outpatient clinic appointment with your child at The Royal Children's Hospital, did you find the SOS Model (screening, outcomes and feedback, support pathways for your own mental health and wellbeing) acceptable?" Response: Yes/No

    Day 7

  • The proportion of eligible caregivers who provide informed consent and enrol in the trial

    The proportion of eligible caregivers with a 95% confidence interval who provide informed consent and enrol in the trial, calculated as the number of consenting participants divided by the total number of caregivers invited to participate.

    Through study completion, an average of 6 months

  • The proportion of caregivers who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 3-month survey.

    The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 3-month survey.

    3 months

  • The proportion of caregivers who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 6-month survey.

    The proportion of caregivers, with a 95% confidence interval, who report following up on a recommended service on the information resource sheet on the 6-month survey.

    6 months

Secondary Outcomes (36)

  • The proportion of caregivers reporting comfort (acceptability) when completing the mental health survey as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

    3 months

  • The proportion of caregivers who would recommend to others completing a mental health and wellbeing survey (acceptability) as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

    3 months

  • The proportion of caregivers reporting comfort (acceptability) when discussing their survey results with a clinician as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

    3 months

  • The proportion of clinicians who report feeling their interactions were well-received in a survey on their experience as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

    4 weeks

  • The proportion of clinicians who report feeling that caregivers understood the feedback results in a survey on their experience (acceptability) as measured on a Likert scale on a study-designed survey

    4 weeks

  • +31 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Screening outcome - information resource sheet

OTHER

Arm Description * This is a single-arm prospective feasibility trial * Every consenting caregiver is screened with a mental health screening questionnaire - the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) * They will be provided feedback on their results * Regardless of the results, all participants will be provided an information resource sheet will that provides descriptions of common mental health conditions, details on how to access psychology support services and links to existing online mental health resources.

Other: Screening, Outcomes and Referral Pathways

Interventions

All participants complete baseline screening with follow up at 3 and 6 months. A key feature of the study is that a standardised information resource sheet (to community-based services) is provided to all caregivers, regardless of their screening scores. Primary outcomes focus on implementation feasibility and acceptability, while secondary outcomes examine service uptake and longitudinal measurement of caregiver wellbeing. This differs from existing research by providing resources universally rather than only to those scoring above clinical thresholds. Our longitudinal follow-up addresses an evidence gap identified in our systematic review - limited published data on downstream effects on actual service uptake and mental health outcomes over time. The services in the resource sheet also link to routine clinical care that doesn't require specialist support programs with dedicated funding.

Screening outcome - information resource sheet

Eligibility Criteria

Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • must be a parent of a child \<18yo in an outpatient clinic at Royal Children's Hospital (in enrolled clinics either neuromuscular or diabetes)
  • able to complete a consent form in English without an interpreter

You may not qualify if:

  • need for an interpreter to complete informed consent

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Outpatient clinics - Royal Children's Hospital

Parkville, Victoria, 3052, Australia

RECRUITING

Related Publications (2)

  • Weiner BJ, Lewis CC, Stanick C, Powell BJ, Dorsey CN, Clary AS, Boynton MH, Halko H. Psychometric assessment of three newly developed implementation outcome measures. Implement Sci. 2017 Aug 29;12(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

    PMID: 28851459BACKGROUND
  • Coscini N, McMahon G, Schulz M, Hosking C, Mulraney M, Grobler A, Hiscock H, Giallo R. Screening parents of children with a chronic condition for mental health problems: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2025 Aug 18;110(9):722-728. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2024-328300.

    PMID: 39978866BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Psychological Well-BeingDepressionChronic DiseaseAnxiety Disorders

Interventions

Mass ScreeningTreatment Outcome

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Personal SatisfactionBehaviorBehavioral SymptomsDisease AttributesPathologic ProcessesPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Diagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisHealth SurveysSurveys and QuestionnairesData CollectionEpidemiologic MethodsInvestigative TechniquesDiagnostic ServicesPreventive Health ServicesHealth ServicesHealth Care Facilities Workforce and ServicesHealth Care Evaluation MechanismsQuality of Health CareHealth Care Quality, Access, and EvaluationPublic HealthEnvironment and Public HealthPublic Health PracticePrognosisOutcome Assessment, Health CareOutcome and Process Assessment, Health CareHealth Services Administration

Study Officials

  • Nadia Coscini, BA, MBBS, MSc

    Murdoch Children's Research Institute & University of Melbourne

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Nadia Coscini, BA, MBBS, MSc

CONTACT

Harriet Hiscock, MBBS, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 7, 2025

First Posted

August 22, 2025

Study Start

October 22, 2025

Primary Completion

April 28, 2026

Study Completion

April 28, 2026

Last Updated

November 26, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Individual Participant Data (IPD) will be shared with other researchers. The specific information that will be made available includes the study protocol, statistical analysis plan, informed consent form templates, and the final report containing de-identified participant data summarised in tables and figures.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR, ANALYTIC CODE
Time Frame
Beginning 12 months following analysis and article publication (aim August 2028), the following will be made available long-term for use by future researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept Murdoch Children's Research Institute's (MCRI) conditions for access: * Study protocol, Participant Information and Consent Forms (PICF), surveys * Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)
Access Criteria
Researchers from a recognised research institution whose proposed use of the data has been ethically reviewed and approved by an independent committee and who accept MCRI's conditions for access: * Study protocol, PICF, surveys * Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article after de-identification (text, tables, figures, and appendices)
More information

Locations