NCT07135947

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Point Powered system as compared to the patient's standard-of-care treatment. This study will be a single subject crossover design where one group of 10 adult partial hand amputees will be evaluated on several metrics on their existing prosthetic treatment (Treatment 1) and the Point Powered system (Treatment 2) over a period of three months using standard two-site myoelectric control. Metrics include: in-clinic functional measures, subjective assessments, bilateral hand use, and prosthesis wear time.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
10

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
4mo left

Started Nov 2025

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress62%
Nov 2025Aug 2026

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 8, 2025

Completed
14 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 22, 2025

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2025

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2026

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 31, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

August 22, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

August 8, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 20, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

ProsthesisMyoelectricDigitsFingers

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (24)

  • Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)

    The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.

    Baseline (pre-fitting)

  • The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

    The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.

    Baseline (pre-fitting)

  • PROMIS Social Isolation

    PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Baseline (pre-fitting)

  • PROMIS Ability to Participate

    PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Baseline (pre-fitting)

  • PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Baseline (pre-fitting)

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Baseline (pre-fitting)

  • Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)

    The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.

    Immediately post-fitting

  • The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

    The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.

    Immediately post-fitting

  • PROMIS Social Isolation

    PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Immediately post-fitting

  • PROMIS Ability to Participate

    PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Immediately post-fitting

  • PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Immediately post-fitting

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    Immediately post-fitting

  • Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)

    The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.

    30 days post-fitting

  • The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

    The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.

    30 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Social Isolation

    PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    30 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Ability to Participate

    PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    30 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    30 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    30 days post-fitting

  • Assessment of Capacity for Myoelectric Control (ACMC)

    The proctor for the measure chooses an everyday activity, such as setting up a table for snacks or replanting a flower, that is relevant to the study population. As the participants perform the chosen task, a trained rater will assess their capacity for control of their myoelectric prosthesis as represented by 30 items reflecting 6 aspects of quality of myoelectric control. These 6 aspects are "the need for external support," "grip force and opening width," "coordination of both hands, "in different positions and in motion (timing)," "repetitive grip and release," and "the need for visual feedback." Each item is scored on a 4-point scale and converted into linear measures of myoelectric control using Rasch analysis methods on the ACMC website. ACMC is the only measure that has been validated for individuals with upper limb (UL) loss who use myoelectric control and has been shown to demonstrate good test-retest reliability.

    60 days post-fitting

  • The Southampton Hand Assessment Procedure (SHAP)

    The SHAP is a time based test of a standardized protocol of 26 timed activities of daily living (ADL) tasks. The SHAP has a set of "common objects" representative of everyday items for the user to pick up. The results of the SHAP is a score which directly compares the abilities of the subject with those of intact able-bodied individuals as well as more refined scores for six prehensile patterns. A SHAP score of 100 is what an intact person is expected to achieve. This test has been validated for normative data.

    60 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Social Isolation

    PROMIS Social Isolation is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceptions of being avoided, excluded, detached, disconnected from, or unknown by, others. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    60 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Ability to Participate

    PROMIS Ability to Participate is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    60 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity

    PROMIS Physical Function - Upper Extremity is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on capability to perform activities that require use of the upper extremity including shoulder, arm, and hand. Examples include writing, using buttons, or opening containers. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    60 days post-fitting

  • PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities

    PROMIS Satisfaction with Social Roles and Activities is a self-reported person-centered measure that focuses on satisfaction with performing one's usual social roles and activities. Responses are scored on a scale of 1 to 5. Individual response scores are summed to get a raw score, which can be converted to a standardized T-score with a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10.

    60 days post-fitting

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Mean Prosthesis Wear Duration (MPWD)

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Bilateral magnitude (BM)

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Magnitude ratio (MR)

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

  • Secondary activity duration variables

    Through study completion, an average of 3 months

Study Arms (2)

Current/No Device

NO INTERVENTION

Baseline outcome measurements will be performed with subject's existing partial hand prosthetic treatment, as deemed standard-of-care by the patient's prosthetist. Device types include, but are not limited to, no prosthesis, passive prosthesis, passive positional prosthesis, body-powered prosthesis, myoelectric prosthesis, or other assistive device.

Point Powered

EXPERIMENTAL

Outcome measurements will be performed after the subject has been fit with the Point Powered at 3 different points in time: immediately post-fitting, \~30 days post-fitting, and \~60 days post-fitting.

Device: Point Powered partial hand prosthetic system

Interventions

The Point Powered system includes 1-4 3-joint mechatronic digits, low-profile EMG electrodes, a low-profile controller, and flexible batteries. These components will be integrated into a waterproof and dustproof packaging

Point Powered

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Partial unilateral hand loss with at least index and/or middle fingers amputated at the MCP level
  • Intact thumb with full range of motion
  • Fluent in English
  • Age of 18 years or older

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients with a residual limb that is unhealed from the amputation surgery
  • Unhealed wounds
  • Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
  • Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus

Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States

Location

Point Designs

Broomfield, Colorado, 80020, United States

Location

Hanger Clinic

Lafayette, Colorado, 80026, United States

Location

Study Officials

  • Levin Sliker, PhD

    Point Designs

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Rebecca Connolly

CONTACT

Levin Sliker, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2025

First Posted

August 22, 2025

Study Start

November 1, 2025

Primary Completion

March 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Last Updated

August 22, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations