Validation of Point Partial User Needs With Partial Finger Amputees
1 other identifier
interventional
5
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The objective of the device feasibility study will be to validate the user needs of the Point Partial system. This study will be a single group intervention model where one group of 5 partial finger amputees will be asked to perform several tasks. Successful completion of a task results in a fulfilled user need. Failure to complete a task results in an unfulfilled user need.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2020
Typical duration for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 3, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2021
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
November 8, 2024
CompletedNovember 8, 2024
August 1, 2024
2.2 years
August 12, 2021
August 21, 2024
August 21, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (10)
VAL-1: System Comfort Validation Test
User wears Point Partial(s) for a full day (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be comfortable for a full day's use. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (8 hours)
VAL-2: Unilateral Function Validation Test
User flexes and extends the Point Partial(s) without using contralateral hand (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall allow the user to flex and extend finger without their second hand. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.1: System Robustness Validation Test With 25 lb Bag
User lifts a 25 lb. bag with Point Partial(s) (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-3.2: Robustness Validation Test With Hammer
User grips a hammer with Point Partial(s) and drives a nail into a piece of wood (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robust enough to operate in challenging environments. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-4: Object Release Validation Test
User releases Point Partial(s) while performing an active grasp by pressing the dorsal button (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be releasable while performing active grasps. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-5: Position Function Validation Test
User positions Point Partial(s) into each of the locking positions (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a smooth ratcheting mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-6: Extension Function Validation Test
User activates spring-back mechanism by using (1) contralateral hand, (2) tabletop, and (3) side or thigh throughout day without failed extension (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a reliable auto spring-back mechanism. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-7: Grip Functions Validation Test
User grips a 5 lb. cylindrical smooth object using Point Partial(s) for 10 seconds (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have high grip surface friction. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-8: Fine Motor Function Validation Test
User picks up 1 coin from a smooth tabletop (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall have a pronounced fingernail. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (10 minutes)
VAL-9: Overall Function & Robustness Validation Test
User performs VAL-1 through VAL-8 (Pass/Fail). This validation method was used to confirm the following user need of the Point Partial has been met: Point Partial shall be robustly attached to mounting system. A simple pass/fail result was recorded for each user need for each participant. An overall passing rate above 80% across all user needs and participants is considered a success. Each participant attended a single-day experimental session. A day-use prosthetic socket was fabricated and Point Partials were mounted to the socket. Then, each participant attempted the validation test.
Day 1 (8 hours)
Study Arms (1)
Prosthesis
EXPERIMENTALPatient is temporarily fit with Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system
Interventions
The Point Partial partial finger prosthetic system consists of 1-4 ratcheting mechanical partial digits and mounting brackets
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Partial finger amputees with partial absence of index and/or middle fingers and presence of thumb. Additional finger loss is acceptable if all other criterion are met.
- Fluent in English
- Individuals aged 18 or greater
- Patients may present with either fused or mobile MCP joints.
You may not qualify if:
- Significant cognitive deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant neurological deficits as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Significant physical deficits of the residual limb impacting full participation in the study as determined upon clinical evaluation
- Uncontrolled pain or phantom pain impacting full participation in the study as determined upon OT evaluation
- Serious uncontrolled medical problems as judged by the project therapist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Point Designslead
- University of Colorado, Denvercollaborator
Study Sites (2)
University of Colorado Denver | Anschutz Medical Campus
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Point Designs
Lafayette, Colorado, 80026, United States
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Research
- Organization
- Point Designs
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DEVICE FEASIBILITY
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2021
First Posted
August 19, 2021
Study Start
November 3, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2022
Study Completion
December 31, 2022
Last Updated
November 8, 2024
Results First Posted
November 8, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share