Comparative Evaluation of Postoperative Pain and Clinical Success
2 other identifiers
interventional
63
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Sixty-three mandibular molars with vital pulp, symptomatic acute pain, and a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of 7 or higher-requiring emergency treatment-were randomly allocated into three groups according to the preparation systems to be used: conventional manual instrumentation technique with hand files, reciprocating motion technique with WaveOne Gold files, and rotary motion technique with ProTaper Ultimate files. In the first session, patients received emergency treatment with one of the three file systems, and seven days later, root canal treatments were completed using the same system within each patient group. Preoperative pain scores of patients presenting to our clinic with acute pain were recorded using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). During the emergency root canal treatment session, the first group was instrumented with hand files, the second group with WaveOne Gold files, and the third group with ProTaper Ultimate files, and the emergency treatment session was completed. Shaping times were measured during the procedures. Following the emergency session, patients were instructed to record their postoperative pain at the 6th hour, 12th hour, and on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th, and 7th days using the provided NRS. One week after the emergency treatment session, root canal obturation was performed using each system's own gutta-percha and Bioceramic root canal sealer. Clinical and radiographic follow-ups were carried out at 6 and 12 months.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2024
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 11, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 11, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 11, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 12, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 20, 2025
CompletedAugust 20, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.1 years
August 12, 2025
August 19, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The incidence and intensity of post-obturation pain
Post-obturation pain up to 30 days after root canal treatment was measured with Numerical Rating Scale. The Numerical Rating Scale is a pain measurement scale that encompasses the following grades: 0 no pain, 1-3 mild pain, 4-6 moderate pain, 7-10 severe pain.
up to 30-day
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Clinical and radiographical success
Up to 1 year follow up
Study Arms (3)
Conventional Manuel Instrumentation Technique Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoot canals were prepared with hand files. Irrigation was performed with 10 mL of NaOCl, followed by 5 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Temporary coronal restoration was completed with glass ionomer cement. For this group, 72 hours after the completion of root canal preparation in the emergency intervention session, calcium hydroxide was applied to the root canals for 7 days, and the teeth were obturated using a bioceramic root canal sealer with the system-specific gutta-percha and obturation methods recommended by the manufacturers.
Reciprocating Motion Technique Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoot canals were prepared with WaveOne Gold instruments and an X-Smart Plus (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland) endodontic motor. Irrigation was performed with 10 mL of NaOCl, followed by 5 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Temporary coronal restoration was completed with glass ionomer cement. For this group, 72 hours after the completion of root canal preparation in the emergency intervention session, calcium hydroxide was applied to the root canals for 7 days, and the teeth were obturated using a bioceramic root canal sealer with the system-specific gutta-percha and obturation methods recommended by the manufacturers.
Rotation Motion Technique Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORRoot canals were prepared with ProTaper Ultimate instruments and an X-Smart Plus (Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland) endodontic motor. Irrigation was performed with 10 mL of NaOCl, followed by 5 mL of 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Temporary coronal restoration was completed with glass ionomer cement. For this group, 72 hours after the completion of root canal preparation in the emergency intervention session, calcium hydroxide was applied to the root canals for 7 days, and the teeth were obturated using a bioceramic root canal sealer with the system-specific gutta-percha and obturation methods recommended by the manufacturers.
Interventions
Root canal treatments were performed with hand files
Root canal treatments were performed with WaveOne Gold Files
Root canal treatments were performed with ProTaper Ultimate Files
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients aged 18-65
- Patients who can come to regular check-ups and have high treatment motivation
- Patients who can establish an appropriate patient-doctor dialogue
- Patients without systemic disease
- Patients with teeth that have not previously undergone endodontic treatment
- Patients who meet the clinical definition of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (pain, prolonged sensitivity to hot and cold,percussion sensitivity, pulpal bleeding)
- Delayed positive response of teeth to cold testing and electric pulp testing
- Presence of spontaneous pain before treatment
- Mandibular first or second molar with complete root development
- Formation of large pulpal perforation during caries removing
- Presence of bleeding in the exposed pulp that cannot be stopped within 5 minutes after the pulp exposure
You may not qualify if:
- Patients who refused to participate in the study
- Patients at medical risk (patients with immune system diseases/systemic diseases, patients using medication),
- Patients with NSAID (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory) allergy
- Patients with allergy to the materials used during root canal treatment
- Patients who used antibiotics or analgesics before applying to the clinic
- Pregnant patients
- Asymptomatic or devital teeth
- Presence of advanced periodontal disease (probing depth\> 3 mm)
- Patients with more than one tooth requiring endodontic treatment
- The relevant tooth has previously undergone endodontic treatment
- The tooth needs a post-core or is a prosthetic support tooth
- Presence of calcified root canal
- Teeth with internal or external root resorption
- Teeth with open apex
- Mandibular third molars
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ege Universitylead
Study Sites (1)
Gözde Kandemir Demirci
Izmir, 35100, Turkey (Türkiye)
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Gözde Kandemir Demirci, Associate Professor
Ege University Faculty of Dentistry
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 12, 2025
First Posted
August 20, 2025
Study Start
June 11, 2024
Primary Completion
July 11, 2025
Study Completion
July 11, 2025
Last Updated
August 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share