Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial of AI-Assisted CTA Detection for Intracranial Aneurysms in Regional Hospitals
IDEAL2
Impact of an AI-Driven CT Angiography Model on Intracranial Aneurysm Detection and Clinical Outcomes in Regional Hospitals (IDEAL2): A Nationwide Stepped-Wedge Cluster-Randomized Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
14,400
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This study (IDEAL 2) is a nationwide stepped-wedge cluster-randomized trial designed to prospectively enroll over 14,400 patients undergoing outpatient head CT angiography (CTA). The trial will be conducted across more than 72 regional hospitals in China. Clusters were randomly assigned to nine randomization groups. In accordance with the stepped-wedge design, clusters will sequentially transition from the control condition (standard human diagnosis) to the intervention condition (AI-assisted diagnosis) at regular intervals over a 10-month period, until all clusters receive the intervention. The primary outcome is the detection rate of intracranial aneurysms. Secondary outcomes include patient prognosis and clinical outcomes.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Oct 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 7, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 15, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 9, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 31, 2029
August 20, 2025
August 1, 2025
11 months
August 7, 2025
August 15, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Detection rate of intracranial aneurysms
The proportion of patients diagnosed with intracranial aneurysms among all individuals undergoing CTA during the observation period. This outcome is used to compare the diagnostic effectiveness of conventional radiologist interpretation based on local clinical practice versus AI-assisted diagnosis in detecting intracranial aneurysms.
Day 1
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Detection rates of other intracranial lesions except aneurysms
Day 1
Follow-up visits and referrals
At 3-month and 12-month follow-up.
Hospitalization
At 3-month and 12-month follow-up.
Invasive DSA examinations
At 3-month and 12-month follow-up.
Aneurysm treatment decisions
At 3-month and 12-month follow-up.
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
AI-Assisted Diagnosis
EXPERIMENTALPatients in this group will undergo head CTA, interpreted by radiologists with the assistance of a previously validated deep learning AI model. The model highlights suspected aneurysm candidates on the CTA images to support diagnostic decision-making.
Standard Diagnosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients in this group will undergo head CTA, which will be interpreted by radiologists following standard local diagnostic protocols. No AI assistance will be provided during image interpretation.
Interventions
A locked, independently validated deep learning model was used to assist radiologists in interpreting head CTA scans. The model was trained on 16,546 CTA cases and externally validated on an independent set of 900 DSA-verified CTA cases, achieving a patient-level sensitivity of 0.943 and an average of 0.187 false positives per case.
Head CTA interpretation performed by radiologists using local routine diagnostic workflows without AI support.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients in the outpatient setting who are scheduled to undergo head CTA scanning
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- History of cerebrovascular surgery involving any metallic implants (e.g., aneurysm embolization, aneurysm clipping, or vascular stenting)
- Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score \> 3
- Refuse to sign written informed consent
- Contraindications to CTA examination
- CTA scan failure, incomplete imaging data, or image quality insufficient for diagnostic evaluation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of Radiology
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 7, 2025
First Posted
August 15, 2025
Study Start
October 9, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 31, 2029
Last Updated
August 20, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share