Feasibility and Outcomes of 3D-printed External Cranial Orthosis After Craniectomy
Feasibility, Safety and Patient Reported Outcomes of 3D-Printed Externally-applied Cranial Orthosis (PEACO) After Decompression Craniectomy in Clinical Settings: A Retrospective Comparison Study of Monitored Versus Unmonitored Protocols
1 other identifier
observational
32
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will compare the outcomes of a current clinical implementation of PEACO designed for one-handed donning and doffing with carer-monitoring with a previous prototype (HPPD) requiring carer-donning and doffing with therapist monitoring.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Jul 2025
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 29, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 29, 2026
August 14, 2025
August 1, 2025
1.1 years
July 31, 2025
August 7, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Treatment-emergent adverse events (safety and tolerability)
The therapist will assess patient in terms of pain, redness, skin imprints and pruritus' on patient's skin after wearing the cranial cap. This is to allow the understanding of the incidence of the treatment-emergent adverse events (safety and tolerability).
30 minutes post fitting (version 1 and 2)
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) PROMs (compliance)
The patient will be sent a questionnaire. The question relating to compliance is "Approximately, how many hours of wear per day including rest breaks?" This will allow team to assess feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes.
2023-2025
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) PROMs (wearing time)
The patient will be sent a questionnaire. The question relating to wearing time is "Approximately, how many hours of wear per day including rest breaks?" This will allow team to assess feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes.
2023-2025
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) PROMs (adverse events)
The patient will be sent a questionnaire. The question relating to adverse event is "Did you experience any of the following after two hours of wear? This will allow team to assess feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes.
2023-2025
Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMS) PROMs (cosmesis rating)
The patient will be sent a questionnaire. The question relating to cosmesis rating is "Please rate the appearance of your cranial cap". This will allow team to assess feasibility, safety and clinical outcomes.
2023-2025
Study Arms (1)
Version 1 Head protection Device 2021
Version 2 Head protection device 2025
Eligibility Criteria
NA as no patient is recruited for this study as the outcomes involve retrospective data as part of a clinical service audit.
You may qualify if:
- Unilateral decompressive craniectomy (DC)
- Acute Stroke or traumatic brain injury
- \>30 days post DC
- Healed surgical wounds, non-bulging flaps
- Presence of caregiver supervision
You may not qualify if:
- Vegetative or minimally responsive state
- Uncontrolled medical illnesses, e.g. sepsis, delirium, active malignancy
- Life expectancy \< 6 months
- Unhealed or infected post-DC neurosurgical wounds
- Known allergy to investigational products
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Singapore, Singapore
Related Publications (3)
Chua KSG, Krishnan RR, Yen JM, Plunkett TK, Soh YM, Lim CJ, Chia CM, Looi JC, Ng SG, Rao J. 3D-printed external cranial protection following decompressive craniectomy after brain injury: A pilot feasibility cohort study. PLoS One. 2021 Oct 28;16(10):e0258296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258296. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 34710123BACKGROUNDFernandez LL, Rodriguez D, Griswold DP, Khun I, Aristizabal S, Aristizabal JH, Richards G, Pavek A, Jayaraman S. Innovative External Cranial Devices for Protecting a Craniectomy Site: A Scoping Review on Noninvasive Approaches for Patients Awaiting Cranioplasty. Neurosurgery. 2025 Apr 1;96(4):713-724. doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000003157. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
PMID: 39248525BACKGROUNDMa S, Li C, Gu Y, Chen Y, Li X, Wang Q, Xu H. Application of a 3D printed wig protection device after decompressive craniectomy. Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9545. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-94246-0.
PMID: 40108252BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Dr Karen Chua, MBBS
Tan Tock Seng Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Consultant Dr (MD)
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2025
First Posted
August 14, 2025
Study Start
July 29, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
August 29, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
August 29, 2026
Last Updated
August 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
no new IP generated