Evaluation of Gingival Displacement Methods
Clinical Evaluation of Different Gingival Displacement Methods
1 other identifier
interventional
52
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This clinical study is being conducted to compare four different methods used to temporarily push the gums away from the teeth during dental procedures. This process, called gingival displacement, is important for dentists to clearly see and work around the tooth when placing crowns or taking impressions. The four methods being studied include: A retraction cord soaked in a special solution, A retraction paste in a capsule, A retraction paste applied with a cap, A soft tissue laser (called a diode laser). Each method is applied to teeth that need crown treatment. The goal is to find out which method moves the gum tissue the most effectively, and which one causes the least bleeding. Fifty-two teeth in total were treated using one of these four methods. Before and after treatment, gum measurements were taken to evaluate how much the gums moved and how much bleeding occurred. By studying these methods, the researchers hope to help dentists choose the most effective and least invasive technique for each patient's needs.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2016
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 24, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 14, 2025
CompletedAugust 14, 2025
August 1, 2025
3 months
July 24, 2025
August 12, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Horizontal Gingival Displacement
The amount of tissue movement away from the tooth surface (laterally). Measured by comparing stereomicroscopic images of polyvinyl siloxane (PVS) impressions taken before and after displacement. The horizontal gap is measured in millimeters.
Baseline and 1 week post-displacement
Vertical Gingival Displacement
The amount of tissue movement in the vertical direction (apically) after using each gingival displacement method.
Baseline and 1 week post-displacement
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Gingival Hemorrhage
Immediately post-displacement
Study Arms (4)
Group K
EXPERIMENTALRetraction cord impregnated with 15% ferric sulfate is used for gingival displacement
Group P1
EXPERIMENTALA retraction paste in capsule form, containing 15% aluminum chloride is used for gingival displacement.
Group P2
EXPERIMENTALA retraction paste in injector form is used for gingival displacement.
Group L
EXPERIMENTALA diode laser is used for gingival displacement.
Interventions
A thin cord (type "00") was soaked in 15% ferric sulfate ferric sulfate hemostatic solution and carefully packed into the gingival sulcus. After 3 minutes, the cord was removed and the sulcus was rinsed. This is a traditional mechanical gingival displacement method.
A retraction paste was applied using a capsule tip placed around the gingival margin. The paste remained in place for 3 minutes and was then rinsed off with air-water spray. This is a non-traumatic chemical displacement technique.
Retractrion paste in injector form with compression cap (15% aluminum chloride) was injected into the sulcus, and a cotton compression cap was placed over the tooth. Patients gently bit on the cap for 3 minutes to apply pressure. Afterward, the paste and cap were removed and the area was rinsed. This method combines chemical and slight mechanical displacement.
A 810-nm diode laser with a 400-micron fiber optic tip was used in contact mode to ablate the sulcular epithelium. The laser was operated at 1.0 W with pulsed settings. The procedure was completed by wiping the area with saline to remove residues. This technique enables precise, bloodless gingival retraction with minimal trauma.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Being over 18 years of age
- Having clinically and radiographically healthy periodontal tissues (probing depth not exceeding 3 mm, no bleeding on probing, no gingival recession, no bone loss)
- Having completed Phase I periodontal therapy
- Having no systemic disease that could affect periodontal health
- Having abutment teeth located in the canine, premolar, or molar regions
- Absence of any developmental anomalies in the abutment teeth
- Absence of age-related degenerative changes in the abutment teeth
You may not qualify if:
- Being under 18 years of age
- Having an uncontrolled or periodontal-health-affecting systemic disease
- Not having periodontally healthy tissues
- Having adjacent abutment teeth
- Having previously prepared abutment teeth
- Presence of any developmental anomaly in the abutment teeth
- Presence of age-related degenerative changes in the abutment teeth
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Seda CENGİZ, DDS, Phd
Professor, Counsellor for Education of Turkish Embassy in Vienna, Prinz-Eugen, Vienna, Austria.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 24, 2025
First Posted
August 14, 2025
Study Start
December 1, 2015
Primary Completion
March 1, 2016
Study Completion
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
August 14, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share