NCT07119697

Brief Summary

This randomized comparative trial evaluates the efficacy of Shacklock neural mobilization versus the McKenzie extension principle in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. The study aims to compare both interventions in terms of their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functional disability. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The trial seeks to inform evidence-based physiotherapeutic approaches for managing lumbar radiculopathy.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
59

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2021

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 7, 2021

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

July 19, 2021

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 26, 2021

Completed
3.7 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 29, 2025

Completed
15 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 13, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

August 13, 2025

Status Verified

August 1, 2025

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

July 29, 2025

Last Update Submit

August 5, 2025

Conditions

Keywords

Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)McKenzie MethodNeural MobilizationRadiculopathyExercise TherapyRehabilitation Outcome

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain Intensity

    Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm horizontal line anchored by no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain. The VAS is a validated and reliable tool, with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94) and strong correlations with other pain measures. Patients marked their pain after a 10-minute rest to minimize activity-induced fluctuations, and assessments were conducted at standardized time points throughout the intervention period.

    3 weeks

  • Functional Disability

    The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1a was used to assess functional limitations related to lumbar radiculopathy. This 10-item questionnaire, scored from 0 to 100%, has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91) in lumbar spine conditions. Participants completed the ODI independently under standardized conditions, ensuring accurate assessment of daily activity limitations associated with radiculopathy.

    3 weeks

  • Lumbar Range of Motion

    Spinal mobility was objectively assessed using a modified Schober's test combined with digital inclinometry (Baseline® inclinometer). Flexion was measured using Schober's method, while extension was assessed with the inclinometer placed at the T12-L1 level. Three consecutive readings were taken and averaged for each direction following a standardized warm-up protocol to minimize viscoelastic tissue effects and ensure consistency across assessments.

    3 weeks

  • Neurodynamic Assessment

    The Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test was conducted using a standardized protocol known for high sensitivity in detecting nerve root compression when combined with ankle dorsiflexion. A Baseline® 12 plastic goniometer was used to measure the angle at which radicular symptoms were first reproduced. The hip was moved at a controlled rate of 10 degree, second to differentiate neural from musculoskeletal responses. This approach allows for consistent and reliable monitoring of neurodynamic changes throughout the intervention period.

    3 weeks

Study Arms (2)

SNM Group

EXPERIMENTAL

SNM Group exhibited 22 participants who received allocated intervention, including Shacklock Neural Mobilization and hydrocollator packs for 15-20 minutes per session, 3-5 days weekly for three weeks.

Other: Shacklock Neural MobilizationOther: Hydrocollator hot packs

MEP Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

MEP Group exhibited 22 participants who received allocated intervention, including the McKenzie Extension Principle and hydrocollator packs for 15-20 minutes per session, 3-5 days weekly for three weeks.

Other: McKenzie Extension PrincipleOther: Hydrocollator hot packs

Interventions

In the SNM group, participants lay supine with hips neutral and knees flexed to 45 degrees. Therapists applied the remote slider technique by extending the knee near end-range and dorsiflexing the ankle to 15 degrees, performed in 3 sets of 15 reps with 30-second rests. Each session lasted 20 minutes including setup. Progression was made by increasing hip flexion in 5 degrees increments when a VAS pain reduction of ≥2 cm was observed. This technique, based on neurodynamic principles, was designed to reduce neural mechanosensitivity and improve mobility in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.

SNM Group

MEP group was treated with MEP in a prone position, starting with 10 repetitions of active trunk extension, holding end-range for 3 seconds. If no symptom centralization occurred, therapists progressed from patient-applied overpressure (EIL-POP) to clinician-applied grade III mobilizations (3 oscillations/second), following McKenzie's force progression model. Each session included 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 1-minute rest between sets, totaling 15 minutes of active intervention. For unilateral symptoms, the approach advanced to hips-off-center techniques involving a 15 degree lateral shift. This graded sequence aimed to reduce nerve root compression and promote symptom centralization.

MEP Group

Both groups received standardized thermotherapy using hydrocollator-heated moist hot packs (40 degrees centigrade, wrapped in 6-8 towel layers) applied to the lumbar region for 15-20 minutes to improve tissue compliance and reduce pain. Participants were positioned prone or side-lying based on comfort and symptom severity; semi-prone positions with pillow support were used for those with heightened sensitivity to maintain spinal neutrality. Thermotherapy was administered five times in week 1 and three times weekly during weeks 2-3. Skin condition and comfort were monitored. This pre-treatment method promoted transient pain relief and muscle relaxation, enhancing tolerance to subsequent therapeutic interventions.

MEP GroupSNM Group

Eligibility Criteria

Age25 Years - 38 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • It required participants to have subacute lumbar radiculopathy (3-6 months duration) with radiating pain to or beyond the knee, with or without neurological signs, and MRI-confirmed mild disc bulge. Eligibility also required meeting at least three of four standardized test item cluster criteria and the ability to read and understand English.

You may not qualify if:

  • It included a history of spinal trauma or surgery, presence of systemic diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes), severe disc pathology (e.g., sequestration), spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis \>10°), chronic radiculopathy lasting more than one year, or current use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

King Saud University Hospital

Riyadh, 10219, Saudi Arabia

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Radiculopathy

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Prof. Ahmad H. Alghadir, PhD

    Rehabilitation Reseach Chair; King Saud University

    STUDY CHAIR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2025

First Posted

August 13, 2025

Study Start

April 7, 2021

Primary Completion

July 19, 2021

Study Completion

November 26, 2021

Last Updated

August 13, 2025

Record last verified: 2025-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Study title, brief and descriptive summary, Methodology, including, Study design, setting, Study protocol, outcomes, iterventions may be shared.

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL
Time Frame
6 weeks
Access Criteria
Peer reviewing intended

Locations