Shacklock Neural Mobilization vs. McKenzie on Pain and Functional Disability in Lumbar Radiculopathy
Efficacy of Shacklock Neural Mobilization vs. McKenzie Extension Principle in Lumbar Radiculopathy: A Randomized Comparative Trial on Pain and Functional Disability
1 other identifier
interventional
59
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This randomized comparative trial evaluates the efficacy of Shacklock neural mobilization versus the McKenzie extension principle in patients with lumbar radiculopathy. The study aims to compare both interventions in terms of their effectiveness in reducing pain and improving functional disability. Outcomes will be measured using validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The trial seeks to inform evidence-based physiotherapeutic approaches for managing lumbar radiculopathy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2021
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 7, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 19, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 26, 2021
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 29, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 13, 2025
CompletedAugust 13, 2025
August 1, 2025
3 months
July 29, 2025
August 5, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Pain Intensity
Pain intensity was measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), a 10-cm horizontal line anchored by no pain (0) and worst imaginable pain. The VAS is a validated and reliable tool, with excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.94) and strong correlations with other pain measures. Patients marked their pain after a 10-minute rest to minimize activity-induced fluctuations, and assessments were conducted at standardized time points throughout the intervention period.
3 weeks
Functional Disability
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) version 2.1a was used to assess functional limitations related to lumbar radiculopathy. This 10-item questionnaire, scored from 0 to 100%, has demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = 0.90) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.91) in lumbar spine conditions. Participants completed the ODI independently under standardized conditions, ensuring accurate assessment of daily activity limitations associated with radiculopathy.
3 weeks
Lumbar Range of Motion
Spinal mobility was objectively assessed using a modified Schober's test combined with digital inclinometry (Baseline® inclinometer). Flexion was measured using Schober's method, while extension was assessed with the inclinometer placed at the T12-L1 level. Three consecutive readings were taken and averaged for each direction following a standardized warm-up protocol to minimize viscoelastic tissue effects and ensure consistency across assessments.
3 weeks
Neurodynamic Assessment
The Straight Leg Raise (SLR) test was conducted using a standardized protocol known for high sensitivity in detecting nerve root compression when combined with ankle dorsiflexion. A Baseline® 12 plastic goniometer was used to measure the angle at which radicular symptoms were first reproduced. The hip was moved at a controlled rate of 10 degree, second to differentiate neural from musculoskeletal responses. This approach allows for consistent and reliable monitoring of neurodynamic changes throughout the intervention period.
3 weeks
Study Arms (2)
SNM Group
EXPERIMENTALSNM Group exhibited 22 participants who received allocated intervention, including Shacklock Neural Mobilization and hydrocollator packs for 15-20 minutes per session, 3-5 days weekly for three weeks.
MEP Group
ACTIVE COMPARATORMEP Group exhibited 22 participants who received allocated intervention, including the McKenzie Extension Principle and hydrocollator packs for 15-20 minutes per session, 3-5 days weekly for three weeks.
Interventions
In the SNM group, participants lay supine with hips neutral and knees flexed to 45 degrees. Therapists applied the remote slider technique by extending the knee near end-range and dorsiflexing the ankle to 15 degrees, performed in 3 sets of 15 reps with 30-second rests. Each session lasted 20 minutes including setup. Progression was made by increasing hip flexion in 5 degrees increments when a VAS pain reduction of ≥2 cm was observed. This technique, based on neurodynamic principles, was designed to reduce neural mechanosensitivity and improve mobility in patients with lumbar radiculopathy.
MEP group was treated with MEP in a prone position, starting with 10 repetitions of active trunk extension, holding end-range for 3 seconds. If no symptom centralization occurred, therapists progressed from patient-applied overpressure (EIL-POP) to clinician-applied grade III mobilizations (3 oscillations/second), following McKenzie's force progression model. Each session included 3 sets of 10 repetitions with 1-minute rest between sets, totaling 15 minutes of active intervention. For unilateral symptoms, the approach advanced to hips-off-center techniques involving a 15 degree lateral shift. This graded sequence aimed to reduce nerve root compression and promote symptom centralization.
Both groups received standardized thermotherapy using hydrocollator-heated moist hot packs (40 degrees centigrade, wrapped in 6-8 towel layers) applied to the lumbar region for 15-20 minutes to improve tissue compliance and reduce pain. Participants were positioned prone or side-lying based on comfort and symptom severity; semi-prone positions with pillow support were used for those with heightened sensitivity to maintain spinal neutrality. Thermotherapy was administered five times in week 1 and three times weekly during weeks 2-3. Skin condition and comfort were monitored. This pre-treatment method promoted transient pain relief and muscle relaxation, enhancing tolerance to subsequent therapeutic interventions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- It required participants to have subacute lumbar radiculopathy (3-6 months duration) with radiating pain to or beyond the knee, with or without neurological signs, and MRI-confirmed mild disc bulge. Eligibility also required meeting at least three of four standardized test item cluster criteria and the ability to read and understand English.
You may not qualify if:
- It included a history of spinal trauma or surgery, presence of systemic diseases (such as rheumatoid arthritis or diabetes), severe disc pathology (e.g., sequestration), spinal deformities (e.g., scoliosis \>10°), chronic radiculopathy lasting more than one year, or current use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
King Saud University Hospital
Riyadh, 10219, Saudi Arabia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Prof. Ahmad H. Alghadir, PhD
Rehabilitation Reseach Chair; King Saud University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 29, 2025
First Posted
August 13, 2025
Study Start
April 7, 2021
Primary Completion
July 19, 2021
Study Completion
November 26, 2021
Last Updated
August 13, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL
- Time Frame
- 6 weeks
- Access Criteria
- Peer reviewing intended
Study title, brief and descriptive summary, Methodology, including, Study design, setting, Study protocol, outcomes, iterventions may be shared.