Effects of Decompression in Patient With Acute vs Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy
Effects of Decompression on Pain, Range of Motion and Function in Patient With Acute vs Chronic Lumbar Radiculopathy
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The study will be done to evaluate the effectiveness of Lumbar Spinal Decompression in patients with acute vs chronic lumbar radiculopathy. Study design will be Randomized control trial and sample size will be 30. Duration of study was of 6 month, convenient sampling was done. Data will be collected from DHQ Daska were randomly allocated in three groups via lottery method, baseline assessment was done. Patients of both gender (male and female) from 18 to 50 years with lumbar radiculopathy diagnosed through X-ray and physical examination will be included. Patients with systemic soft tissue and bony diseases will be excluded. Intervention duration of 4 weeks, 3 sessions in a week. Decompression of lumbar spine will be given once in a week. Whole procedure of treatment program will given to patients and written informed consent will be taken. Basic tools will be Visual analog scale (VAS), SLR, ODI, Inclinometer. Data was analyzed by using SPSS version 21
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2020
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 30, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 16, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 19, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 30, 2021
CompletedMarch 8, 2021
March 1, 2021
9 months
December 16, 2020
March 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Visual Analogue Scale
A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a measurement instrument that tries to measure a characteristic or attitude that is believed to range across a continuum of values and cannot easily be directly measured
4th week
Secondary Outcomes (1)
MODIFIED OSWESTRY LOW BACK PAIN DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE
4th Week
Other Outcomes (1)
Inclinometer
4th Week
Study Arms (3)
Group A
EXPERIMENTALDecompression + Hot pack, TENS, Mobilization, Exercise Therapy
Group B
EXPERIMENTALDecompression + Hot pack, TENS, Mobilization, Exercise Therapy
Group C
OTHERHot pack , TENS, Mobilization, Exercise therapy
Interventions
Group B which includes the chronic group to study the effects of decompression we will apply the three main basic treatments along with decompression which is our main goal.. The basic treatments are 1. Hot Pack 2. TENSE 3. Mobilization ( on lumbar L1 toL5 ) Our first modality which is hot pack will be given to the patients for a duration of 15 minutes The next modality TENSE will be given for 10 minutes The third treatment which is mobilization will be given 1 time on each joint of lumbar spine All these treatments must given in combination with the decompression.
Group C which is our control group to compare it with the groups A and B to study the effects of decompression on lumbar radiculopathy The basic treatments are 1. Hot Pack 2. TENSE 3. Mobilization ( on lumbar L1 toL5 ) Our first modality which is hot pack will be given to the patients for a duration of 15 minutes The next modality TENSE will be given for 10 minutes The third treatment which is mobilization will be given 1 time on each joint of lumbar spine It is kept in mind that in this group we will not apply the decompression along with the above treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- history of radicular pain with straight leg raise (SLR).
- Patients in the acute phase of (up to 6 weeks) included in group A
- Patients in chronic phase of (more than 6 weeks) included in group B
You may not qualify if:
- Any systemic soft tissue and bony disease.
- Patient with spinal tuberculosis, spinal fractures, pregnancy, cancer.
- Any recent surgery.
- Patient with any cervical or thoracic problem.
- Patients with any other serious pathology/red flags
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
DHQ hospital
Daska Kalan, Punjab Province, Pakistan
Related Publications (15)
Cheng YH, Hsu CY, Lin YN. The effect of mechanical traction on low back pain in patients with herniated intervertebral disks: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2020 Jan;34(1):13-22. doi: 10.1177/0269215519872528. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
PMID: 31456418BACKGROUNDSwanson BT, Riley SP, Cote MP, Leger RR, Moss IL, Carlos J Jr. Manual unloading of the lumbar spine: can it identify immediate responders to mechanical traction in a low back pain population? A study of reliability and criterion referenced predictive validity. J Man Manip Ther. 2016 May;24(2):53-61. doi: 10.1179/2042618614Y.0000000072.
PMID: 27559274BACKGROUNDRubinic DM, Koo V, Dudley J, Owens SC. Changes in Spinal Height After Manual Axial Traction or Side Lying: A Clinical Measure of Intervertebral Disc Hydration Using Stadiometry. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2019 Mar-Apr;42(3):187-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 May 9.
PMID: 31078315BACKGROUNDAsiri F, Tedla JS, D Alshahrani MS, Ahmed I, Reddy RS, Gular K. Effects of patient-specific three-dimensional lumbar traction on pain and functional disability in patients with lumbar intervertebral disc prolapse. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):498-502. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_285_19.
PMID: 32246656BACKGROUNDMo Z, Li D, Zhang R, Chang M, Yang B, Tang S. Comparisons of the Effectiveness and Safety of Tuina, Acupuncture, Traction, and Chinese Herbs for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2019 Mar 20;2019:6821310. doi: 10.1155/2019/6821310. eCollection 2019.
PMID: 31015852BACKGROUNDMitchell UH, Beattie PF, Bowden J, Larson R, Wang H. Age-related differences in the response of the L5-S1 intervertebral disc to spinal traction. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2017 Oct;31:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.06.004. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
PMID: 28624722BACKGROUNDIsner-Horobeti ME, Dufour SP, Schaeffer M, Sauleau E, Vautravers P, Lecocq J, Dupeyron A. High-Force Versus Low-Force Lumbar Traction in Acute Lumbar Sciatica Due to Disc Herniation: A Preliminary Randomized Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2016 Nov-Dec;39(9):645-654. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2016.09.006. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
PMID: 27838140BACKGROUNDTadano S, Tanabe H, Arai S, Fujino K, Doi T, Akai M. Lumbar mechanical traction: a biomechanical assessment of change at the lumbar spine. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019 Apr 9;20(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2545-9.
PMID: 30961554BACKGROUNDCreighton D, Schweiger A, Cubr S. Immediate Effects of Side Lying Manual Lumbar Traction in Patients with Painful Active Lumbar Motion. Journal of International Academy of Physical Therapy Research. 2017;8(1):1071-6.
BACKGROUNDOh H, Choi S, Lee S, Choi J, Lee K. The impact of manual spinal traction therapy on the pain and Oswestry disability index of patients with chronic back pain. J Phys Ther Sci. 2018 Dec;30(12):1455-1457. doi: 10.1589/jpts.30.1455. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
PMID: 30568333BACKGROUNDKisner C, Colby LA, Borstad J. Therapeutic exercise: foundations and techniques: Fa Davis; 2017.
BACKGROUNDThackeray A, Fritz JM, Childs JD, Brennan GP. The Effectiveness of Mechanical Traction Among Subgroups of Patients With Low Back Pain and Leg Pain: A Randomized Trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016 Mar;46(3):144-54. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2016.6238. Epub 2016 Jan 26.
PMID: 26813755BACKGROUNDSzulc P, Wendt M, Waszak M, Tomczak M, Cieslik K, Trzaska T. Impact of McKenzie Method Therapy Enriched by Muscular Energy Techniques on Subjective and Objective Parameters Related to Spine Function in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain. Med Sci Monit. 2015 Sep 29;21:2918-32. doi: 10.12659/MSM.894261.
PMID: 26418868BACKGROUNDLo WLA, Lei D, Leng Y, Huang H, Wang B, Yu Q, Li L. Impact of nonsurgical spinal decompression on paraspinal muscle morphology and mechanical properties in young adults with low back pain. J Int Med Res. 2020 Jul;48(7):300060520919232. doi: 10.1177/0300060520919232.
PMID: 32723102BACKGROUNDHallur SS, Brismee JM, Sizer PS, Dierick F, Dewan BM, Thiry P, Sobczak S. Three-Dimensional Spinal Position With and Without Manual Distraction Load Increases Spinal Height. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2020 May;43(4):267-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2019.04.007. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
PMID: 32709513BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Syed Shakil Ur Rehman
Riphah International University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 16, 2020
First Posted
December 19, 2020
Study Start
March 30, 2020
Primary Completion
December 30, 2020
Study Completion
January 30, 2021
Last Updated
March 8, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share