Early Prophylactic Decompressive Hemicraniectomy Following Endovascular Therapy in Large Hemispheric Infarct Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
380
1 country
2
Brief Summary
Early Decompressive Hemicraniectomy for High-Risk Large Ischemic Core Stroke Post-EVTAcute Ischemic Stroke (AIS), particularly Anterior Circulation Large Vessel Occlusion (LVO), is a major cause of global disability and death. While endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) is the standard first-line treatment for LVO, outcomes remain poor in patients with large ischemic cores (ASPECTS ≤5). Despite high recanalization rates (\>90%), only 14-30% achieve functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days, with 33-50% dead or severely disabled (mRS 5-6). Outcomes worsen dramatically with larger core volumes (e.g., only 4.4% functional independence with cores ≥150mL in SELECT2).A critical complication is Malignant Cerebral Edema (MCE), affecting \~50% of large-core patients post-EVT. MCE triggers a vicious cycle of rising intracranial pressure, reduced perfusion, and brain herniation. It drastically worsens prognosis: functional independence rates plummet (13.3% vs 51.2% without MCE), mortality significantly increases (OR=7.96, p=0.001), and functional outcomes deteriorate (OR=7.83, p=0.008). Strong predictors include low ASPECTS (\<7) and large infarct volume.Decompressive Hemicraniectomy (DHC) is a life-saving intervention for MCE. Landmark trials (DESTINY, DECIMAL, HAMLET) and their meta-analysis show DHC within 24 hours in patients aged 18-60 significantly increases 12-month survival (78% vs 29%, ARR 50%) and rates of ambulatory independence (mRS ≤3: 43% vs 21%, ARR 23%). DESTINY II confirmed benefit in patients \>60, improving functional outcomes (mRS 0-4: 38% vs 16%). Guidelines endorse DHC for large infarcts with deterioration.However, significant challenges persist: DHC is Underutilized: Despite evidence, clinical adoption remains low.Rescue DHC Fails to Improve Outcomes in Post-EVT MCE: Studies report poor functional outcomes (only 20% mRS 0-2) and high mortality (48.6%) with standard medical therapy (SMT) plus rescue DHC after MCE develops. Retrospective data confirms worse outcomes in these patients (mRS 0-2: 16.4% vs 50%; mortality: 46.5% vs 20%) compared to those without MCE. Crucially, rescue DHC itself fails to improve prognosis once MCE is established (mRS 5-6: 64% vs 57.7%; mortality: 48% vs 46.2%).High-Risk Identification: Patients defined as high-risk for MCE (ASPECTS 3-5 + NIHSS≥30 or ASPECTS≤2) have significantly worse 90-day outcomes (mRS 0-2: 23.2% vs 44.6%; mortality: 44% vs 22.7%).Timing is Critical: Rescue DHC is often performed too late, after irreversible neurological damage occurs. Early/Prophylactic DHC, performed before significant edema and herniation develop, offers a potential pathophysiological advantage. It may:Improve cerebral perfusion pressure earlier. Reduce mass effect and edema progression. Mitigate secondary injury (e.g., reduce oxygen-free radicals, excitatory amino acids).Potentially break the ischemic-edema-herniation cycle sooner.Rationale for the Study: While DHC is effective for established MCE in non-EVT contexts and rescue DHC post-EVT is ineffective, high-quality evidence for early prophylactic DHC in high-risk large-core patients after successful EVT is lacking. Current guidelines do not address this specific, high-risk population where MCE incidence is \~50% and outcomes are dismal despite recanalization. Study Aim: This trial will evaluate the efficacy and safety of early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy compared to standard medical treatment (which includes rescue DHC if MCE develops) in AIS-LVO patients at high risk of MCE (defined by ASPECTS and NIHSS criteria) following successful EVT. The goal is to determine if proactive intervention can improve functional outcomes and reduce mortality in this critically ill population where current strategies fail.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 29, 2025
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 19, 2029
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 19, 2029
January 26, 2026
August 1, 2025
3.9 years
June 29, 2025
January 22, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of mRS score of 0-4
Rate of mRS score of 0-4
90 days (±7 days) after randomization
Secondary Outcomes (16)
Rate of mRS score of 0-3 Ordinal shift analysis of mRS •Rate of mRS score of 0-2 •Rate of midline shift ≥ 5 mm •Rate of brain herniation Improvement of the NIHSS Rate of neurological deterioration Rate of rescue decompressive hemicraniectomy
90 days (±7 days) after randomization
Ordinal shift analysis of mRS
90 days (±7 days) after randomization
Rate of mRS score of 0-2
90 days (±7 days) after randomization
Rate of midline shift ≥ 5 mm
Within 72 hours after randomization
Rate of brain herniation
Within 72 hours after randomization
- +11 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Experimental group
EXPERIMENTALEarly prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy
Control group
NO INTERVENTIONStandard medical treatment (with or without rescue decompressive craniectomy if needed).
Interventions
Early prophylactic decompressive hemicraniectomy (decompressive hemicraniectomy is required to initiate within 6 hours after completion of mechanical thrombectomy and within 4 hours after randomization).
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Any symptoms and signs of brain herniation before randomization, such as pupil anisocoria and unstable vital signs.
- In the judgment of the investigator, the subject is likely to have supportive care withdrawn in the first day.
- Commitment to decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC) prior to enrollment.
- Severe, sustained hypertension (systolic blood pressure \> 220 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure \> 110 mm Hg);
- Baseline blood glucose \<50 mg/dl (2.8 mmol/L) or \>400 mg/dl (22.2 mmol/L);
- Baseline platelet count \<100 x10\^9/L;
- Known hemorrhagic diathesis, coagulation factor deficiency, or oral anticoagulant therapy with international normalized ratio \> 1.7;
- Severe renal insufficiency, defined as serum creatinine \> 3.0 mg/dl (or 265.2 μmol/l) or glomerular filtration rate \[GFR\] \< 30 ml/min, or patients requiring hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis;
- Patients that cannot complete 90-day follow-up (such as no fixed residence, overseas patients, etc.);
- Suspected vasculitis or septic embolism;
- Neurological diseases or mental disorders before onset that affect the assessment of the condition;
- Females who are pregnant or in lactation;
- Participating in other clinical trials that could confound the evaluation of the study;
- Subjects who, in the opinion of the investigator, have a life expectancy \<3 months due to conditions not related to current LHI or are unlikely to comply with follow-up requirements. Other conditions that the investigators believe are not suitable for participation or may pose a significant risk to the patient.
- Evidence of other brain diseases such as cerebral trauma, intracranial tumor (except small meningioma), cerebral aneurysm, etc.
- +3 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University.
Beijing, China
Liaocheng Brain Hospital
Shandong, China
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 29, 2025
First Posted
August 12, 2025
Study Start
July 19, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 19, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 19, 2029
Last Updated
January 26, 2026
Record last verified: 2025-08