Rectal NSAIDs With/Without PD Stent for PEP Prevention
Rectal Non-steroid Anti-inflammatory Drugs With or Without Prophylactic Pancreatic Duct Stent for Prevention of Post-ERCP Pancreatitis: a Multicenter, Randomized, Non-inferiority Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
1,278
1 country
15
Brief Summary
Pancreatitis is the most common and serious complication following post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and is associated with occasional mortality, extended hospital stays, and increased healthcare expenses. Rectal non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and pancreatic duct stent (PDS) placement were demonstrated to be effective strategyies to reduce PEP incidences, particlularly in high-risk patients for post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP). Rectal NSAIDs were easy-to-use and safe, while PDS placement were technically complex and carried higher risks of adverse events. A previous network meta-analysis suggested rectal NSAIDs in combination with PDS placement did not differ from rectal NSAIDs alone in PEP prevention. To invesigate if rectal NSAIDs alone could obivate the need of PDS placement, a recent trial from Elmunzer et al. conducted a randomized trial to investigate if rectal NSAIDs alone was non-inferior to the combination of NSAIDs with PDS in high-risk patients. The trial found that the PEP incidence rate in combination group was significantly lower than that in NSAIDs alone group. However, post-hoc analysis of the study suggested that the combination strategy conferred significant benefits only in high-risk patients with pancreatic duct (PD) wire passage, but not in those with other risk factors. Therefore, we hypothesized that rectal NSAIDs alone may obivate the need of PDS in high-risk patients without PD wire passages. Here, we conducted a multicenter, randomized and non-inferiority trial to investigate whether rectal NSAIDs alone is non-inferior to NSAIDs plus PDS placement in high-risk patients without PD wire passages.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jul 2025
Typical duration for not_applicable
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 1, 2025
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 5, 2025
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 12, 2025
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2028
December 3, 2025
December 1, 2025
1.5 years
August 5, 2025
December 1, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Rate of post-ERCP Pancreatitis
a new or aggravated upper abdominal pain, with an elevated pancreatic enzyme of at least 3 times as the upper limit of normal value 24h after procedure and prolonged hospitalization days for at least 2 days. This definition was based on a widely recognized Cotton consensus
30 days
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Rate of mild, moderate or severe PEP
30 days
Rate of patients with different severity of pancreatitis evaluated by revised Atlanta criteria
30 days
Rate of ERCP-related perforation
30 days
Rate of ERCP-related infection
30 days
Rate of ERCP-related bleeding
30 days
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
NSAIDs alone
EXPERIMENTALAll patients without contraindications should receive 100mg rectal indomethacin or diclofenac within 30mins before ERCP procedure
NSAIDs plus PDS
ACTIVE COMPARATORAll patients without contraindications should receive 100mg rectal indomethacin or diclofenac within 30mins before ERCP procedure. When eligibility is met, PDS placement will be performed by ERCP colonoscopists.
Interventions
All patients without contraindications should receive 100mg rectal indomethacin or diclofenac within 30mins before ERCP procedure
All patients without contraindications should receive 100mg rectal indomethacin or diclofenac within 30mins before ERCP procedure. When eligibility is met, PDS placement will be performed by ERCP colonoscopists.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years old patients with native papilla who planned to undergo ERCP
- high-risk patients for post-ERCP pancreatitis must meet one or more following criteria: clinical suspicion of sphincter of Oddi dysfunction, a history of PEP, pancreatic sphincterotomy, precut sphincterotomy, difficult cannulation (\>5 cannulation attempts, or \>5mins cannulation time, or \>1 unintentional pancreatic duct cannulation), or ballon dilatation of an intact biliary sphincter ≤ 1 min, double-wire cannulation. Additionally, patients were considered high-risk if they fulfilled two or more of the following minor criteria: female gender under 50 years old, a history of recurrent pancreatitis (two or more episodes), three or more contrast injections into the pancreatic duct with at least one injection reaching the tail of the pancreas, opacification of pancreatic acini, or brush cytology performed on the pancreatic duct.
You may not qualify if:
- Previous biliary sphincterotomy and papillary large balloon dilation
- Planned for placements of pancreatic duct stents (eg. pancreatic duct strictures, planned ampullectomy)
- Allergy to NSAIDs
- The administration of NSAIDs within 7 days
- Not suitable for NSAIDs administration (gastrointestinal hemorrhage within 4 weeks, renal dysfunction \[Cr \>1.4mg/dl=120umol/l\]; presence of coagulopathy before the procedure)
- Acute pancreatitis within 7 days before ERCP or acute pancreatitis with obvious Pancreatic edema and peripancreatic fluid collections
- Hemodynamical instability
- Pregnancy or lactation
- high-risk patients with pancreatic duct wire passages
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (15)
The first medical center, Chinese PLA General Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100000, China
Department of gastroenterology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University
Chongqing, Chongqing Municipality, 400010, China
Department of Gastroenterology, Fujian Medical University Xiamen Humanity Hospital
Xiamen, Fujian, 361000, China
Harbin Medical University Affiliated Fourth Hospital
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150000, China
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
Harbin, Heilongjiang, 150000, China
Department of Gastroenterology, Huaihe Hospital of Henan University
Kaifeng, Henan, 475000, China
Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000, China
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
Changsha, Hunan, 410000, China
986 Hospital of Xijing Hospital
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710000, China
Xijing of Digestive Diseases
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
Department of Gastroenterology, The 960th Hospital of the PLA
Jinan, Shandong, 250000, China
Shandong Provincial Third Hospital
Jinan, Shandong, 250000, China
Department of Endoscopy, Eastern Hepatobiliary Hospital, Second Military Medical University
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 201823, China
Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310000, China
Related Publications (5)
Dumonceau JM, Kapral C, Aabakken L, Papanikolaou IS, Tringali A, Vanbiervliet G, Beyna T, Dinis-Ribeiro M, Hritz I, Mariani A, Paspatis G, Radaelli F, Lakhtakia S, Veitch AM, van Hooft JE. ERCP-related adverse events: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2020 Feb;52(2):127-149. doi: 10.1055/a-1075-4080. Epub 2019 Dec 20.
PMID: 31863440BACKGROUNDElmunzer BJ, Foster LD, Serrano J, Cote GA, Edmundowicz SA, Wani S, Shah R, Bang JY, Varadarajulu S, Singh VK, Khashab M, Kwon RS, Scheiman JM, Willingham FF, Keilin SA, Papachristou GI, Chak A, Slivka A, Mullady D, Kushnir V, Buxbaum J, Keswani R, Gardner TB, Forbes N, Rastogi A, Ross A, Law J, Yachimski P, Chen YI, Barkun A, Smith ZL, Petersen B, Wang AY, Saltzman JR, Spitzer RL, Ordiah C, Spino C, Durkalski-Mauldin V; SVI Study Group. Indomethacin with or without prophylactic pancreatic stent placement to prevent pancreatitis after ERCP: a randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2024 Feb 3;403(10425):450-458. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02356-5. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
PMID: 38219767BACKGROUNDHan S, Zhang J, Durkalski-Mauldin V, Foster LD, Serrano J, Cote GA, Bang JY, Varadarajulu S, Singh VK, Khashab M, Kwon RS, Scheiman JM, Willingham FF, Keilin SA, Groce JR, Lee PJ, Krishna SG, Chak A, Slivka A, Mullady D, Kushnir V, Buxbaum J, Keswani R, Gardner TB, Wani S, Edmundowicz SA, Shah RJ, Forbes N, Rastogi A, Ross A, Law J, Yachimski P, Chen YI, Barkun A, Smith ZL, Petersen BT, Wang AY, Saltzman JR, Spitzer RL, Spino C, Elmunzer BJ, Papachristou GI; SVI Study Group. Impact of difficult biliary cannulation on post-ERCP pancreatitis: secondary analysis of the stent versus indomethacin trial dataset. Gastrointest Endosc. 2025 Mar;101(3):617-628. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.10.003. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
PMID: 39389431BACKGROUNDAkbar A, Abu Dayyeh BK, Baron TH, Wang Z, Altayar O, Murad MH. Rectal nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are superior to pancreatic duct stents in preventing pancreatitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a network meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;11(7):778-83. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2012.12.043. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
PMID: 23376320BACKGROUNDHalttunen J, Keranen I, Udd M, Kylanpaa L. Pancreatic sphincterotomy versus needle knife precut in difficult biliary cannulation. Surg Endosc. 2009 Apr;23(4):745-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-0056-0. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
PMID: 18649101BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 5, 2025
First Posted
August 12, 2025
Study Start
July 1, 2025
Primary Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2028
Last Updated
December 3, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12